Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for ≥T1b Primary Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Report From the International Radiosurgery Oncology Consortium for Kidney (IROCK).


Journal

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
ISSN: 1879-355X
Titre abrégé: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7603616

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 11 2020
Historique:
received: 03 04 2020
revised: 04 06 2020
accepted: 08 06 2020
pubmed: 21 6 2020
medline: 14 4 2021
entrez: 21 6 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Patients with larger (T1b, >4 cm) renal cell carcinoma (RCC) not suitable for surgery have few treatment options because thermal ablation is less effective in this setting. We hypothesize that SABR represents an effective, safe, and nephron-sparing alternative for large RCC. Individual patient data from 9 institutions in Germany, Australia, USA, Canada, and Japan were pooled. Patients with T1a tumors, M1 disease, and/or upper tract urothelial carcinoma were excluded. Demographics, treatment, oncologic, and renal function outcomes were assessed using descriptive statistics. Kaplan-Meier estimates and univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression were generated for oncologic outcomes. Ninety-five patients were included. Median follow-up was 2.7 years. Median age was 76 years, median tumor diameter was 4.9 cm, and 81.1% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1 (or Karnofsky performance status ≥70%). In patients for whom operability details were reported, 77.6% were defined as inoperable as determined by the referring urologist. Mean baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 57.2 mL/min (mild-to-moderate dysfunction), with 30% of the cohort having moderate-to-severe dysfunction (eGFR <45mL/min). After SABR, eGFR decreased by 7.9 mL/min. Three patients (3.2%) required dialysis. Thirty-eight patients (40%) had a grade 1 to 2 toxicity. No grade 3 to 5 toxicities were reported. Cancer-specific survival, overall survival, and progression-free survival were 96.1%, 83.7%, and 81.0% at 2 years and 91.4%, 69.2%, 64.9% at 4 years, respectively. Local, distant, and any failure at 4 years were 2.9%, 11.1%, and 12.1% (cumulative incidence function with death as competing event). On multivariable analysis, increasing tumor size was associated with inferior cancer-specific survival (hazard ratio per 1 cm increase: 1.30; P < .001). SABR for larger RCC in this older, largely medically inoperable cohort, demonstrated efficacy and tolerability and had modest impact on renal function. SABR appears to be a viable treatment option in this patient population.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32562838
pii: S0360-3016(20)31255-4
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.06.014
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

941-949

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Shankar Siva (S)

Division of Radiation Oncology and Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. Electronic address: Shankar.Siva@petermac.org.

Rohann J M Correa (RJM)

Department of Radiation Oncology, London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario, Canada.

Andrew Warner (A)

Department of Radiation Oncology, London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario, Canada.

Michael Staehler (M)

University of Munich Hospitals, Munich, Germany.

Rodney J Ellis (RJ)

University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio; Penn State Cancer Institute, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania.

Lee Ponsky (L)

University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.

Irving D Kaplan (ID)

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.

Anand Mahadevan (A)

Geisinger Health, Danville, Pennsylvania.

William Chu (W)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Senthilkumar Gandhidasan (S)

Division of Radiation Oncology and Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Radiation Oncology, London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario, Canada.

Anand Swaminath (A)

Division of Radiation Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Hiroshi Onishi (H)

Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan.

Bin S Teh (BS)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Cancer Center and Research Institute, Houston, Texas.

Simon S Lo (SS)

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington.

Alexander Muacevic (A)

University of Munich Hospitals, Munich, Germany.

Alexander V Louie (AV)

Department of Radiation Oncology, London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH