Precrastination and individual differences in working memory capacity.
Journal
Psychological research
ISSN: 1430-2772
Titre abrégé: Psychol Res
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0435062
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2021
Jul 2021
Historique:
received:
24
02
2020
accepted:
11
06
2020
pubmed:
22
6
2020
medline:
31
7
2021
entrez:
22
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
When ordering tasks, people tend to first perform the task that can be started or completed sooner (precrastination) even if it requires more physical effort. Evidence from transport tasks suggests that precrastination can reduce cognitive effort and will likely not occur if it increases cognitive effort. However, some individuals precrastinate even when it increases cognitive effort. We examined whether individual differences in working memory capacity (WMC) influence this suboptimal choice. Participants retrieved two cups of water along a corridor, in the order of their choosing. We measured the frequency of choosing the close cup first (precrastination) while varying water levels in each cup (attention demand) located at different distances. Results showed that the tendency to select the far cup first (avoid precrastination) increases when the close cup is full (high attention demand) vs. not full (low attention demand). Post-hoc results showed high (vs. low) WMC individuals more frequently bypass decisions with relatively higher costs of cognitive effort, avoiding precrastination when the attentional demand of carrying the close (vs. far) cup is relatively high (close-cup full and far-cup half full), but not when it is relatively low (far-cup full). However, there was no evidence that WMC could explain why some individuals always precrastinated, at costs of cognitive effort. Instead, individuals who always precrastinated reported automatic behavior, and those who avoided precrastinating reported decisions of efficiency. Learning, the relationship between precrastination and tendencies to enjoy/engage in thinking or procrastinate, and evidence that precrastination required more cognitive effort in our task, are discussed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32564130
doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01373-6
pii: 10.1007/s00426-020-01373-6
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1970-1985Informations de copyright
© 2020. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Ballard, D. H., Hayhoe, M. M., & Pelz, J. B. (1995). Memory representations in natural tasks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7(1), 66–80. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.1995.7.1.66 .
doi: 10.1162/jocn.1995.7.1.66
pubmed: 23961754
Ballard, D. H., Hayhoe, M. M., Pook, P. K., & Rao, R. P. N. (1997). Deictic codes for the embodiment of cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20(4), 723–742. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X97001611 .
doi: 10.1017/S0140525X97001611
Bates, D., Achler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 .
doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Behmer, L. P., Jr., & Fournier, L. R. (2014). Working memory modulates neural efficiency over motor components during a novel action planning task: An EEG study. Behavioral Brain Research, 260, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2013.11.031 .
doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.11.031
Blinch, J., & DeWinne, C. R. (2019). Pre-crastination and procrastination effects occur in a reach-to-grasp task. Experimental Brain Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-019-05493-3 . (Advance online publication).
doi: 10.1007/s00221-019-05493-3
pubmed: 31664489
Botvinick, M. M., Buxbaum, L. J., Bylsma, L. M., & Jax, S. A. (2009a). Toward an integrated account of object and action selection: A computational analysis and empirical findings from reaching-to-grasp and tool-use. Neuropsychologia, 47(3), 671–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.11.024 .
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.11.024
pubmed: 19100758
Botvinick, M. M., Huffstetler, S., & McGuire, J. T. (2009b). Effort discounting in human nucleus accumbens. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 9(1), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.9.1.16 .
doi: 10.3758/CABN.9.1.16
Botvinick, M. M., & Rosen, Z. B. (2008). Anticipation of cognitive demand during decision making. Psychological Research, 73(6), 835–842. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-008-0197-8 .
doi: 10.1007/s00426-008-0197-8
pubmed: 19023592
pmcid: 2793678
Braver, T. S. (2012). The variable nature of cognitive control: A dual-mechanisms framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(2), 106–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.12.010 .
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.12.010
pubmed: 22245618
pmcid: 3289517
Braver, T. S., Gray, J. R., & Burgess, G. C. (2007). Explaining the many varieties of working memory variation: Dual mechanisms of cognitive control. In A. R. A. Conway, C. Jarrold, M. J. Kane, A. Miyake, & J. N. Towse (Eds.), Variation in working memory (pp. 76–106). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Kao, C. F. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48(3), 306–307. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4803_13 .
doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4803_13
pubmed: 16367530
Castiello, U. (1996). Grasping a fruit: Selection for action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22(3), 582–603. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.22.3.582 .
doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.22.3.582
pubmed: 8666954
Christenfeld, N. (1995). Choices from identical situations. Psychological Science, 6(1), 550–555. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00304.x .
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00304.x
Conway, A. R. A., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilheim, O., & Engle, R. W. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(5), 769–786. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196772 .
doi: 10.3758/BF03196772
Craighero, L., Fadiga, L., Umiltà, C. A., & Rizzolatti, G. (1996). Evidence for visuomotor priming effect. NeuroReport, 8(1), 347–349. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.25.6.1673 .
doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.25.6.1673
pubmed: 9051808
Droll, J. A., & Hayhoe, M. M. (2007). Trade-offs between gaze and working memory use. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(6), 1352–1365. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.33.6.1352 .
doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.6.1352
pubmed: 18085948
Dunn, T. L., Lutes, D. J., & Risko, E. F. (2016). Metacognitive evaluation in the avoidance of demand. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42, 1372–1388. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000236 .
doi: 10.1037/xhp0000236
pubmed: 27123679
Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (2005). Prospective memory: Multiple retrieval processes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(6), 286–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00382.x .
doi: 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00382.x
Engle, R. W. (2002). Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(19), 19–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00160 .
doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.00160
Engle, R. W. (2010). Role of working-memory capacity in cognitive control. Current Anthropology, 51(1), S17–S26. https://doi.org/10.1086/650572 .
doi: 10.1086/650572
Engle, R. W., & Kane, M. J. (2004). Executive attention, working memory capacity, and a two-factor theory of cognitive control. In B. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 44, pp. 145–199). New York: Elsevier.
Feghhi, I., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2020). Effort avoidance is not simply error avoidance. Psychological Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01331-2 . (in press).
doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01331-2
pubmed: 32240372
Foster, J. L., Shipstead, Z., Harrison, T. L., Hicks, K. L., Redick, T. S., & Engle, R. W. (2015). Shortened complex span tasks can reliably measure working memory capacity. Memory and Cognition, 43(2), 226–236. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-014-0461-7 .
doi: 10.3758/s13421-014-0461-7
pubmed: 25217113
Fournier, L. R., Behmer, L. P., Jr., & Stubblefield, A. M. (2014). Interference due to shared features between action plans is influenced by working memory span. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 1524–1529. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0627-0 .
doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0627-0
Fournier, L. R., Coder, E., Kogan, C., Raghunath, N., Taddese, E. T., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2019). Which task will we choose first? Precrastination and cognitive load in task ordering. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-018-1633-5 .
doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1633-5
Fournier, L. R., Stubblefield, A., Dyre, B. P., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2018). Starting or finishing sooner? Sequencing preferences in object transfer tasks. Psychological Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1022-7 .
doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1022-7
pubmed: 30006887
pmcid: 7583435
Gray, W. D., Sims, C. R., Fu, W.-T., & Schoelles, M. J. (2006). The soft constraints hypothesis: A rational analysis approach to resource allocation for interactive behavior. Psychological Review, 113(3), 461–482. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.113.3.461 .
doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.113.3.461
pubmed: 16802878
Harrell Jr., F. E. (2018). RMS: Regression modeling strategies. R package version 5.1-2. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rms .
Hull, C. L. (1943). Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century.
Humphreys, G. W., & Riddoch, M. J. (2001). Detection by action: Neuropsychological evidence for action-defined templates in search. Nature Neuroscience, 4(1), 84–88. https://doi.org/10.1038/82940 .
doi: 10.1038/82940
pubmed: 11135649
Jax, S. A., & Buxbaum, L. J. (2010). Response interference between functional and structural actions linked to the same familiar object. Cognition, 115(2), 350–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.01.004 .
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.01.004
pubmed: 20156619
pmcid: 2837086
Jax, S. A., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2007). Hand path priming in manual obstacle avoidance: Evidence that the dorsal stream does not only control visually guided actions in real time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(2), 425–441. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.33.2.425 .
doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.2.425
pubmed: 17469977
Kane, M. J., Brown, L. H., McVay, J. C., Silvia, P. J., Myin-Germeys, I., & Kwapil, T. R. (2007). For whom the mind wanders, and when. Psychological Science, 18(7), 614–621. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01948.x .
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01948.x
pubmed: 17614870
Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2000). Working-memory capacity, proactive interference, and divided attention: Limits on long-term memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(2), 336–358. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.26.2.336 .
doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.26.2.336
pubmed: 10764100
Kool, W., McGuire, J. T., Rosen, Z. B., & Botvinick, M. M. (2010). Decision making and the avoidance of cognitive demand. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139(4), 665–682. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020198 .
doi: 10.1037/a0020198
Kurzban, R., Duckworth, A., Kable, J. W., & Myers, J. (2013). An opportunity cost model of subjective effort and task performance. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(6), 661–679. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12003196 .
doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12003196
Lay, C. H. (1986). At last, my research article on procrastination. Journal of Research in Personality, 20(4), 474–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(86)90127-3 .
doi: 10.1016/0092-6566(86)90127-3
McGuire, W. J. (1969). The nature of attitudes and attitude change. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 136–314). Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley
McGuire, J. T., & Botvinick, M. M. (2010). Prefrontal cortex, cognitive control, and the registration of decision costs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(17), 7922–7926. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910662107 .
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0910662107
pubmed: 20385798
pmcid: 2867898
McNamara, D. S., & Scott, J. L. (2001). Working memory capacity and strategy use. Memory and Cognition, 29(1), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195736 .
doi: 10.3758/BF03195736
pubmed: 11277453
Pavese, A., & Buxbaum, L. J. (2002). Action matters: The role of action plans and object affordances in selection for action. Visual Cognition, 9(4–5), 559–590. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280143000584 .
doi: 10.1080/13506280143000584
Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1988). Adaptive strategy selection in decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14(3), 534–552. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.14.3.534 .
doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.14.3.534
Qualtrics (2005). Version March, 2019. Provo, Utah, USA. https://www.qualtrics.com . Accessed Mar 2019
Redick, T. S. (2014). Cognitive control in context: Working memory capacity and proactive control. Acta Psychologica, 145, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.10.010 .
doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.10.010
pubmed: 24240136
Rizopoulos, D. (2020). GLMMadaptive: Generalized linear mixed models using adaptive Gaussian quadrature. R package version 0.6-8. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=GLMMadaptive .
Rosch, E. (1999). Principles of categorization. In E. Margolis & S. Laurence (Eds.), Concepts: Core readings (pp. 189–206). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Rosenbaum, D. A., Fournier, L. R., Levy-Tzedek, S., McBride, D. M., Rosenthal, R., Sauerberger, K., VonderHaar, R. L., Wasserman, E. A., Zentall, T. R. (2019). Sooner rather than later: Precrastination rather than procrastination. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(3), 229–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419833652 .
doi: 10.1177/0963721419833652
Rosenbaum, D. A., Gong, L., & Potts, C. A. (2014). Precrastination: Hastening sub-goal completion at the expense of extra physical effort. Psychological Science, 25(7), 1487–1496. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614532657 .
doi: 10.1177/0956797614532657
pubmed: 24815613
Shah, A. K., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2008). Heuristics made easy: An effort-reduction framework. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.207 .
doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.207
pubmed: 18298269
R Core Team (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/
Tipper, S. P., Paul, M., & Hayes, A. (2006). Vision-for action: The effects of object property discrimination and action state on affordance compatibility effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 493–498. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193875 .
doi: 10.3758/BF03193875
Tucker, M., & Ellis, R. (1998). On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(3), 830–846. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.24.3.830 .
doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.24.3.830
pubmed: 9627419
Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28(2), 127–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(89)90040-5 .
doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(89)90040-5
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 .
doi: 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
pubmed: 17835457
VonderHaar, R. L., McBride, D. M., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2019). Task order choices in cognitive and perceptual-motor tasks: The cognitive-load-reduction (CLEAR) hypothesis. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 81(7), 2517–2525. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01754-z .
doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01754-z
Wasserman, E. A., & Brzykcy, S. J. (2015). Precrastination in the pigeon. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(4), 1130–1134. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0758-3 .
doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0758-3
Zbrodoff, N. J. (1999). Effects of counting in alphabet arithmetic: Opportunistic stopping and priming of intermediate steps. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(2), 299–317. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.25.2.299 .
doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.25.2.299