Chemosaturation with percutaneous hepatic perfusion is effective in patients with ocular melanoma and cholangiocarcinoma.
Aged
Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating
/ administration & dosage
Bile Duct Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Chemotherapy, Cancer, Regional Perfusion
/ instrumentation
Cholangiocarcinoma
/ drug therapy
Female
Humans
Liver Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Male
Melanoma
/ drug therapy
Melphalan
/ administration & dosage
Middle Aged
Progression-Free Survival
Retrospective Studies
Salvage Therapy
/ instrumentation
Uveal Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Cholangiocarcinoma
Ocular melanoma
Percutaneous hepatic perfusion
Journal
Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology
ISSN: 1432-1335
Titre abrégé: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 7902060
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2020
Nov 2020
Historique:
received:
12
05
2020
accepted:
09
06
2020
pubmed:
22
6
2020
medline:
7
10
2020
entrez:
22
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Chemosaturation with percutaneous hepatic perfusion (CS-PHP; Hepatic CHEMOSAT® Delivery System; Delcath Systems Inc, USA) is a novel interventional procedure, which delivers high doses of melphalan directly to the liver in patients with liver tumors while limiting systemic toxicity through hemofiltration of the hepatic venous blood. We have previously shown promising efficacy for patients with ocular melanoma (OM) and cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) within our single-center and multi-center experiences. The aim of this study was to analyze the safety and efficacy of CS-PHP after 141 treatments at Hannover Medical School, Germany. Overall response rates (ORR) were assessed according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST1.1). Median Overall survival (mOS), median progression-free survival (mPFS), and median hepatic PFS (mhPFS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier estimation. Overall, 60 patients were treated with CS-PHP in the salvage setting from October 2014 until January 2019 at Hannover Medical School with a total of 141 procedures. Half of the patients were patients with hepatic metastases of ocular melanoma (OM) (n = 30), 14 patients had CCA (23.3%), 6 patients had hepatocellular carcinoma (10%), and 10 patients were treated for other secondary liver malignancies (16.7%). In total, ORR and disease stabilization rate were 33.3% and 70.3% (n = 25), respectively. ORR was highest for patients with OM (42.3%), followed by patients with CCA (30.8%). Independent response-associated factors were normal levels of lactate dehydrogenase (odds ratio (OR) 13.7; p = 0.015) and diagnosis with OM (OR 9.3; p = 0.028). Overall, mOS was 9 months, mPFS was 4 months, and mhPFS was 5 months. Patients with OM had the longest mOS, mPFS, and mhPFS with 12, 6, and 6 months, respectively. Adverse events included most frequently significant, but transient, hematologic toxicities (80% of grade 3/4 thrombopenia), less frequently hepatic injury up to liver failure (3.3%) and cardiovascular events including two cases of ischemic insults (5%). Salvage treatment with CS-PHP is safe and effective particularly in patients OM and CCA. Careful attention should be paid to possible, serious hepatic, and cardiovascular complications.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Chemosaturation with percutaneous hepatic perfusion (CS-PHP; Hepatic CHEMOSAT® Delivery System; Delcath Systems Inc, USA) is a novel interventional procedure, which delivers high doses of melphalan directly to the liver in patients with liver tumors while limiting systemic toxicity through hemofiltration of the hepatic venous blood. We have previously shown promising efficacy for patients with ocular melanoma (OM) and cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) within our single-center and multi-center experiences. The aim of this study was to analyze the safety and efficacy of CS-PHP after 141 treatments at Hannover Medical School, Germany.
METHODS
METHODS
Overall response rates (ORR) were assessed according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST1.1). Median Overall survival (mOS), median progression-free survival (mPFS), and median hepatic PFS (mhPFS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier estimation.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Overall, 60 patients were treated with CS-PHP in the salvage setting from October 2014 until January 2019 at Hannover Medical School with a total of 141 procedures. Half of the patients were patients with hepatic metastases of ocular melanoma (OM) (n = 30), 14 patients had CCA (23.3%), 6 patients had hepatocellular carcinoma (10%), and 10 patients were treated for other secondary liver malignancies (16.7%). In total, ORR and disease stabilization rate were 33.3% and 70.3% (n = 25), respectively. ORR was highest for patients with OM (42.3%), followed by patients with CCA (30.8%). Independent response-associated factors were normal levels of lactate dehydrogenase (odds ratio (OR) 13.7; p = 0.015) and diagnosis with OM (OR 9.3; p = 0.028). Overall, mOS was 9 months, mPFS was 4 months, and mhPFS was 5 months. Patients with OM had the longest mOS, mPFS, and mhPFS with 12, 6, and 6 months, respectively. Adverse events included most frequently significant, but transient, hematologic toxicities (80% of grade 3/4 thrombopenia), less frequently hepatic injury up to liver failure (3.3%) and cardiovascular events including two cases of ischemic insults (5%).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Salvage treatment with CS-PHP is safe and effective particularly in patients OM and CCA. Careful attention should be paid to possible, serious hepatic, and cardiovascular complications.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32564137
doi: 10.1007/s00432-020-03289-5
pii: 10.1007/s00432-020-03289-5
pmc: PMC7519914
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating
0
Melphalan
Q41OR9510P
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3003-3012Références
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47
pubmed: 19097774
Clin Liver Dis. 2008 Feb;12(1):131-50, ix
pubmed: 18242501
Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Jul;16(7):1852-9
pubmed: 19434456
Eur Radiol. 2019 Apr;29(4):1882-1892
pubmed: 30255257
Semin Liver Dis. 2010 Feb;30(1):52-60
pubmed: 20175033
Ann Surg Oncol. 2005 Feb;12(2):138-44
pubmed: 15827794
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 14;382(20):1894-1905
pubmed: 32402160
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Apr;23(4):1309-19
pubmed: 26597368
J Clin Oncol. 2005 May 20;23(15):3465-74
pubmed: 15908655
Ann Surg Oncol. 2004 Mar;11(3):290-7
pubmed: 14993024
J Gastrointest Surg. 2004 Feb;8(2):200-7
pubmed: 15036196
Cancer Imaging. 2019 May 30;19(1):31
pubmed: 31146793
Ann Oncol. 2008 Jun;19(6):1127-34
pubmed: 18304962
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2017 Oct;143(10):2113-2121
pubmed: 28634727
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2014 Jun;37(3):763-9
pubmed: 24402644
Lancet Oncol. 2020 May;21(5):671-684
pubmed: 32203698
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2019 Jun;42(6):841-852
pubmed: 30767147
Ann Oncol. 2014 Dec;25(12):2328-2338
pubmed: 24769639
J Clin Med. 2019 Dec 25;9(1):
pubmed: 31881761
Surgery. 2004 Dec;136(6):1176-82
pubmed: 15657573
Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2013 Jun 15;6(7):1230-44
pubmed: 23826405
Rofo. 2014 Oct;186(10):937-44
pubmed: 24729409
N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 8;362(14):1273-81
pubmed: 20375404