Study of anorectal dynamics in patients undergoing laparoscopic ultra-low resection and transanal intersphincteric resection for rectal cancer.
anorectal dynamics
colorectal surgery
intersphincteric resection
laparoscopic total mesorectal excision
rectal cancer
Journal
ANZ journal of surgery
ISSN: 1445-2197
Titre abrégé: ANZ J Surg
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 101086634
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2020
12 2020
Historique:
received:
10
03
2020
revised:
09
05
2020
accepted:
20
05
2020
pubmed:
22
6
2020
medline:
15
5
2021
entrez:
22
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Quite a few studies on anal functions after open total mesorectal excision combined with transanal intersphincteric resection (ISR) have been reported, but there is little literature on anal function after laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LTME) combined with transanal ISR. The aim of this study was to explore the post-operative anorectal dynamic changes in ultra-low rectal cancer patients undergoing LTME combined with transanal ISR. The data of 26 ultra-low rectal cancer patients undergoing LTME + transanal ISR were analysed. A total of 30 patients undergoing laparoscopic low anterior resection by the same surgeons during the same period were randomly enrolled into the control group. There were no differences in the preoperative anorectal manometry data and Wexner anal function scores between the observation group and the control group (P > 0.05). There were no significant differences in the mean operation time, the mean amount of bleeding and the mean post-operative hospital stay between the two groups (P > 0.05). The mean follow-up time was 16 months. No recurrence and metastasis were found in all cases. At 3 and 6 months after the operation, there were significant differences in the anorectal manometry data and Wexner anal function scores between the two groups (P < 0.05). However, at 1 year after the operation, there were no significant differences in the anorectal manometry data and Wexner anal function scores between the two groups (P > 0.05). Laparoscopic ISR for ultra-low rectal cancer is technically feasible, but the surgical indications should be strictly defined.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Quite a few studies on anal functions after open total mesorectal excision combined with transanal intersphincteric resection (ISR) have been reported, but there is little literature on anal function after laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LTME) combined with transanal ISR. The aim of this study was to explore the post-operative anorectal dynamic changes in ultra-low rectal cancer patients undergoing LTME combined with transanal ISR.
METHODS
The data of 26 ultra-low rectal cancer patients undergoing LTME + transanal ISR were analysed. A total of 30 patients undergoing laparoscopic low anterior resection by the same surgeons during the same period were randomly enrolled into the control group.
RESULTS
There were no differences in the preoperative anorectal manometry data and Wexner anal function scores between the observation group and the control group (P > 0.05). There were no significant differences in the mean operation time, the mean amount of bleeding and the mean post-operative hospital stay between the two groups (P > 0.05). The mean follow-up time was 16 months. No recurrence and metastasis were found in all cases. At 3 and 6 months after the operation, there were significant differences in the anorectal manometry data and Wexner anal function scores between the two groups (P < 0.05). However, at 1 year after the operation, there were no significant differences in the anorectal manometry data and Wexner anal function scores between the two groups (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSION
Laparoscopic ISR for ultra-low rectal cancer is technically feasible, but the surgical indications should be strictly defined.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2478-2483Informations de copyright
© 2020 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.
Références
Braun J, Treutner KH, Winkeltau G, Heidenreich U, Lerch MM, Schumpelick V. Results of intersphincteric resection of the rectum with direct coloanal anastomosis for rectal carcinoma. Am. J. Surg. 1992; 163: 407-12.
Watanabe M, Teramoto T, Hasegawa H, Kitajima M. Laparoscopic ultralow anterior resection combined with per anum intersphincteric rectal dissection for lower rectal cancer. Dis. Colon Rectum 2000; 43: S94-7.
Hamada M, Matsumura T, Matsumoto T et al. Advantages of the laparoscopic approach for intersphincteric resection. Surg. Endosc. 2011; 25: 1661-3.
Fujimoto Y, Akiyoshi T, Kuroyanagi H et al. Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2010; 14: 645-50.
Uchikoshi F, Nishida T, Ueshima S, Nakahara M, Matsuda H. Laparoscope-assisted anal sphincter-preserving operation preceded by transanal procedure. Tech. Coloproctol. 2006; 10: 5-9.
Chi P, Lin H, Lu X et al. Laparoscopic pelvic approach to ISR for ULAR. Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery(Chinese) 2010; 30: 203-5.
Deng J, Peng X, Yu S, Zhu C, Guo X. LTME combined with transanal intersphincteric resection for the treatment of ultra-low rectal cancer. Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery(Chinese) 2012; 15: 79-80.
Rullier E, Zerbib F, Laurent C et al. Intersphincteric resection with excision of internal anal sphincter for conservative treatment of very low rectal cancer. Dis. Colon Rectum 1999; 42: 1168-75.
Teramoto T, Watanabe M, Kitajima M. Peranum intersphincteric rectal dissection with direct coloanal anastomosis for lower rectal cancer: the ultimate sphincter-preserving operation. Dis. Colon Rectum 1997; 40 (10 Suppl.): S43-7.
Su H, Peng LH, Sun G et al. Effect of different body position on anorectal manometry for chronic constipation patients. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci 2019; 23: 8493-500.
Ho YH, Tan H, Leong A, Eu KW, Nyam D, Seow-Choen F. Anal pressures impaired by stapler insertion during colorectal anastomosis: a randomized, controlled trial. Dis. Colon Rectum 1999; 42: 89-95.
Cong J, Dai X, Zhang H et al. Anal sphincter function assessment of intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer. Chinese Journal of Modern Medicine (Chinese) 2008; 18: 795-8.
Han JG, Wei GH, Gao ZG, Zheng Y, Wang ZJ. Intersphincteric resection with direct coloanal anastomosis for ultralow rectal cancer: the experience of People's Republic of China. Dis. Colon Rectum 2009; 52: 950-7.
Laurent C, Paumet T, Leblanc F, Denost Q, Rullier E. Intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: laparoscopic vs open surgery approach. Colorectal Dis. 2012; 14: 35-41.
Chamlou R, Parc Y, Simon T et al. Long-term results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Ann. Surg. 2007; 246: 916-21.
Gamagami R, Istvan G, Cabarrot P, Liagre A, Chiotasso P, Lazorthes F. Faecal continence following partial resection of the anal canal in distal rectal cancer: long-term results after coloanal anastomoses. Surgery 2000; 127: 291-5.