Effect of Exposure to Cats and Dogs on the Risk of Asthma and Allergic Rhinitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

allergic association asthma cat dog exposure meta-analysis rhinitis risk systematic review

Journal

American journal of rhinology & allergy
ISSN: 1945-8932
Titre abrégé: Am J Rhinol Allergy
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101490775

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 23 6 2020
medline: 10 8 2021
entrez: 23 6 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Controversies persist regarding whether exposure to cat or dog increases the risk of asthma and allergic rhinitis. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the associations between exposure to cats or dogs and the development of asthma and allergic rhinitis. A systematic review was performed to identify case-control and cohort studies before May 2019, evaluating the association between exposure to cats and dogs and the risk of asthma and rhinitis. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The odds ratios (ORs) and risk ratios (RRs) were pooled for case-control and cohort studies, respectively. Subgroup analyses were performed on prespecified study-level characteristics. The meta-analysis of 34 cohort studies showed a protective role of exposure to cats [RR: 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.77-0.99] or dogs (RR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.73-0.97) in the development of asthma. The subgroup analysis of birth cohort (RR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.56-0.93) and children population (RR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.70-0.96) also suggested a favorable role of exposure to dogs in the development of asthma. Pooled evidence from 13 case-control studies indicated no significant impact of cats (OR: 1.66, 95% CI: 0.39-2.94) and dogs (OR: 1.22, 95% CI: 0.92-1.52) on the development of asthma. A pooled analysis of five cohort studies showed a favorable effect of exposure to cats (RR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.33-0.86) or dogs (RR: 0.68, 95% CI 0.44-0.90) on the development of allergic rhinitis. The findings indicated a protective effect of exposure to cats and dogs, especially ownership, on the development of asthma and allergic rhinitis.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Controversies persist regarding whether exposure to cat or dog increases the risk of asthma and allergic rhinitis.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
This meta-analysis aimed to assess the associations between exposure to cats or dogs and the development of asthma and allergic rhinitis.
METHODS METHODS
A systematic review was performed to identify case-control and cohort studies before May 2019, evaluating the association between exposure to cats and dogs and the risk of asthma and rhinitis. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The odds ratios (ORs) and risk ratios (RRs) were pooled for case-control and cohort studies, respectively. Subgroup analyses were performed on prespecified study-level characteristics.
RESULTS RESULTS
The meta-analysis of 34 cohort studies showed a protective role of exposure to cats [RR: 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.77-0.99] or dogs (RR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.73-0.97) in the development of asthma. The subgroup analysis of birth cohort (RR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.56-0.93) and children population (RR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.70-0.96) also suggested a favorable role of exposure to dogs in the development of asthma. Pooled evidence from 13 case-control studies indicated no significant impact of cats (OR: 1.66, 95% CI: 0.39-2.94) and dogs (OR: 1.22, 95% CI: 0.92-1.52) on the development of asthma. A pooled analysis of five cohort studies showed a favorable effect of exposure to cats (RR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.33-0.86) or dogs (RR: 0.68, 95% CI 0.44-0.90) on the development of allergic rhinitis.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
The findings indicated a protective effect of exposure to cats and dogs, especially ownership, on the development of asthma and allergic rhinitis.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32564683
doi: 10.1177/1945892420932487
doi:

Substances chimiques

Allergens 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Meta-Analysis Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

703-714

Auteurs

Xiaoping Gao (X)

Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China.

Mei Yin (M)

Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, the Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China.

Pei Yang (P)

Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China.

Xia Li (X)

Department of Otolaryngology, The Third People's Hospital of Yinchuan, Yinchuan, China.

Lingling Di (L)

Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China.

Wei Wang (W)

Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China.

Hua Cui (H)

Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, the Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China.

Xiaohui Yan (X)

Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China.

Jing Liu (J)

Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH