FN400 and LPC Responses to Different Degrees of Sensory Involvement: A Study of Sentence Comprehension.
FN400
emotioncy-based language
instruction (EBLI)
late positive component (LPC)
sensory involvement
sentence comprehension
Journal
Advances in cognitive psychology
ISSN: 1895-1171
Titre abrégé: Adv Cogn Psychol
Pays: Poland
ID NLM: 101283299
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
entrez:
23
6
2020
pubmed:
23
6
2020
medline:
23
6
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The current study tested the likely effect of sensory involvement on the FN400 and late positive complex (LPC) responses to semantic and pragmatic comprehension of English sentences. Fifteen English language learners took part in the event-related potential (ERP) experiment and determined the acceptability of 432 sentences under congruent, semantically incongruent, and pragmatically incongruent conditions. Prior to the ERP recording, the subjects received different sensory instructions for six vocabulary items about which they had no previous knowledge. No sensory instruction was given for three extra words, and these served as the control group. The behavioral data corroborated that integration of more senses in instruction improved learners' pragmatic comprehension. The ERP data revealed that full sensory involvement (involvement) reduced the FN400 amplitude, facilitating real world knowledge retrieval and pragmatic comprehension. The LPC responses to semantic comprehension showed that learners reanalyzed the sentences instructed through limited sensory involvement (exvolvement) more deeply.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32566053
doi: 10.5709/acp-0283-6
pmc: PMC7293998
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
45-58Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2020 University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw.
Références
Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Jun;11(6):251-7
pubmed: 17481940
Brain Res. 2007 May 18;1146:23-49
pubmed: 17400197
Brain Lang. 2006 Jan;96(1):90-105
pubmed: 16083953
Int J Psychophysiol. 1998 Jun;29(1):83-104
pubmed: 9641251
Psychophysiology. 2011 Sep;48(9):1203-7
pubmed: 21457275
Brain Lang. 1980 Nov;11(2):354-73
pubmed: 7470854
Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Jun;11(6):243-50
pubmed: 17475539
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1994 Mar;20(2):290-303
pubmed: 8151274
Learn Mem. 2007 Apr 05;14(4):259-67
pubmed: 17412965
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Mar;23(3):514-23
pubmed: 19925201
Cortex. 2012 Jul;48(7):805-25
pubmed: 21621764
Cogn Neurosci. 2012;3(3-4):193-207
pubmed: 24171735
Trends Cogn Sci. 2012 Jun;16(6):313-5; discussion 315-6
pubmed: 22578306
Neuropsychologia. 1999 Jun;37(7):771-85
pubmed: 10408645
Neuropsychologia. 2014 Aug;61:150-62
pubmed: 24953958
Science. 2004 Apr 16;304(5669):438-41
pubmed: 15031438
Brain Res. 2007 May 18;1146:210-8
pubmed: 17433893
Neuroreport. 2000 Apr 7;11(5):977-81
pubmed: 10790867
Psychophysiology. 2008 Jul;45(4):554-8
pubmed: 18282200
Int J Psychophysiol. 2012 Feb;83(2):176-90
pubmed: 22019481
Neuroimage. 2012 Nov 15;63(3):1334-42
pubmed: 22850570
Neuropsychologia. 2014 Oct;63:34-42
pubmed: 25111034
J Cogn Neurosci. 1993 Summer;5(3):345-62
pubmed: 23972222
Biol Psychol. 1980 Sep;11(2):99-116
pubmed: 7272388
Science. 1980 Jan 11;207(4427):203-5
pubmed: 7350657
Brain Lang. 2002 Dec;83(3):367-83
pubmed: 12468394
J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Mar;21(3):447-60
pubmed: 18564050
Nat Neurosci. 2004 Jul;7(7):703-4
pubmed: 15195094
Int J Psychophysiol. 2019 Jan;135:95-105
pubmed: 30527597
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 May;31(3):443-67
pubmed: 15910130
Brain Lang. 2016 Apr-May;155-156:36-43
pubmed: 27108245
Brain Res. 2007 May 18;1146:75-84
pubmed: 16901469
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1994 Jul;20(4):804-23
pubmed: 8064248
Annu Rev Psychol. 2011;62:621-47
pubmed: 20809790
J Neurophysiol. 2007 May;97(5):3193-205
pubmed: 17329632
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 1996 Sep;4(2):99-107
pubmed: 8883923
Neuropsychologia. 1971 Mar;9(1):97-113
pubmed: 5146491
Psychophysiology. 2011 Apr;48(4):532-46
pubmed: 20701709
Mem Cognit. 1983 Sep;11(5):539-50
pubmed: 6656613
Front Psychol. 2012 Sep 06;3:318
pubmed: 22973249