Penetrating injuries to the vertebral artery: interventions and outcomes from US Trauma Centers.
Interpersonal violence
Nonoperative management of penetrating trauma
Penetrating trauma
Stroke
Vertebral artery injury
Journal
European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society
ISSN: 1863-9941
Titre abrégé: Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101313350
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2022
Feb 2022
Historique:
received:
15
04
2020
accepted:
12
06
2020
pubmed:
23
6
2020
medline:
11
2
2022
entrez:
23
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Penetrating injuries to the vertebral artery are rare and incompletely studied. Operative, angioembolic, and nonoperative strategies are management options, although the association between management strategy and outcomes is unknown. This study endeavored to define the epidemiology, management strategy, and outcomes after penetrating injuries to the vertebral artery presenting to trauma centers nationwide. Patients with veterbral artery injuries were identified from the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) (2016-2017) using ICD-10-CM codes. Only those with penetrating mechanisms of injury were included in the study. Transferred patients were excluded. Study groups were defined by management strategy (Operative management, OM; angioembolization, AE; and nonoperative management, NOM). Patient demographics, injury characteristics, and outcomes were compared between groups using univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis with logistic regression was used to examine independent risk factors for mortality and stroke. Penetrating injuries to the vertebral artery were rare (n = 476, < 1% of NTDB patient population). Median age was 28 [IQR 21-37] years and 81% (n = 385) of patients were male. Interpersonal violence was the most common injury intent (n = 374, 79%). Most patients were managed with NOM (n = 409, 86%), with AE and OM utilized less frequently (8% and 6%, respectively). Stab wounds were the most frequent mechanism of injury among patients managed with OM (62%), while gunshot wounds were most common among patients managed with NOM (84%) or AE (79%). Multivariate analysis of risk factors for stroke revealed only associated carotid artery injury (OR 4.236, 95% CI 1.284-13.970, p = 0.018) and AE (OR 6.342, 95% CI 1.417-28.399, p = 0.016) were independent predictors. Independent risk factors for mortality were advanced age (OR 1.026, 95% CI 1.001-1.052, p = 0.044); elevated ISS (OR 1.030, 95% CI 1.008-1.052, p = 0.006); and associated traumatic brain injury (OR 3.020, 95% CI 1.333-6.843, p = 0.008). Higher ED GCS was independently associated with reduced mortality (OR 0.788, 95% CI 0.731-0.849, p < 0.001). Vertebral artery injuries after penetrating mechanisms are infrequent in the United States. Patients with these injuries tend to be young adult men who were injured by gunshot wounds as a result of interpersonal violence. The majority of these injuries were managed nonoperatively, with operative intervention required most commonly for patients injured by stab wounds. Risk factors for both stroke and mortality were principally due to patient factors and associated injuries. Increased risk of stroke among patients managed with angioembolization will need to be further investigated with future study to determine if this risk is imparted from the management strategy itself or from underlying injury characteristics.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32567022
doi: 10.1007/s00068-020-01416-y
pii: 10.1007/s00068-020-01416-y
pmc: PMC7306101
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
481-488Informations de copyright
© 2020. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Mwipatayi BP, Jeffery P, Beningfield SJ, Motale P, Tunnicliffe J, Navsaria PH. Management of extra-cranial vertebral artery injuries. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004;27:157–62.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2003.11.008
Demetriades D, Theodorou D, Asensio J, Golshani S, Belzberg H, Yellin A, Weaver F, Berne TV. Management options in vertebral artery injuries. Br J Surg. 1996;83(1):83–6.
doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800830126
Yee LF, Olcott EW, Knudson MM, Lim RC. Extraluminal, transluminal, and observational treatment for vertebral artery injuries. J Trauma. 1995;39:480–6.
doi: 10.1097/00005373-199509000-00014
Hatzitheofilou C, Demetriades D, Melissas J, Stewart M, Franklin J. Surgical Approaches to Vertebral Artery Injuries. Br J Surg. 1988;75:234–7.
doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800750315
Reid JD, Weigelt JA. Forty-three cases of vertebral artery trauma. J Trauma. 1988;28:1007–122.
doi: 10.1097/00005373-198807000-00016
Blickenstaff KL, Weaver FA, Yellin AE, Stain SC, Finck E. Trends in the management of traumatic vertebral artery injuries. Am J Surg. 1989;158:101–6.
doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(89)90355-3
Golueke P, Sclafani S, Phillips T, Goldstein A, Scalea T, Duncan A. Vertebral artery injury-diagnosis and management. J Trauma. 1987;27:856–65.
doi: 10.1097/00005373-198708000-00003
Meier DE, Brink BE, Fry WJ. Vertebral artery trauma: acute recognition and treatment. Arch Surg. 1981;116:236–9.
doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1981.01380140082021
Asensio JA, Dabestani PJ, Wenzl FA, Milijkovic SS, Kessler JJ, Fernandez CA, Becker T, Cornell D, Siu M, Voigt C, Agrawal DK. A systematic review of penetrating extracranial vertebral artery injuries. J Vasc Surg. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2019.10.084 [Epub ahead of print].
doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.10.084
pubmed: 33002586
pmcid: 33002586
American College of Surgeons. National Trauma Data Bank: NTDB research data set admission years 2007–2014. Chicago, IL; 2017.
Demetriades D, Schellenberg M, Nash N. Vertebral artery. In: Demetriades D, Inaba K, Velmahos GC (Eds) Atlas of surgical techniques in trauma, 2nd Ed., 2019.