The "Yogurt" Technique for Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Graft Preparation: A Novel Quick and Safe Method for Both Inexperienced and Senior Surgeons.
Journal
Cornea
ISSN: 1536-4798
Titre abrégé: Cornea
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8216186
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2020
Sep 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
23
6
2020
medline:
1
7
2021
entrez:
23
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To describe and evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel technique to prepare Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) donor grafts using a newly designed partial-thickness hinge punch. The novel punch has a circular guarded blade missing 1 clock hour, creating an uncut hinge on the donor cornea. In addition, 2 straight cuts are made by the punch perpendicular to the edge of trephination toward the trabecular meshwork in the hinge area. After the donor corneoscleral rim is positioned endothelial side up, a partial-thickness trephination is performed avoiding any rotational movements. Descemet membrane is lifted from Schwalbe line in the hinge area, and DMEK graft is peeled after desired marking without further preparation. Three surgeons of different experience levels on DMEK (senior/independent/fellow) initially applied the new technique in 18 research corneas, divided into equal groups. Two failures in graft preparation were noted, defined as radial tears extending ≥0.5 mm. The mean preparation time was 6.21 ± 1.45 minutes. No statistically significant differences were noted in success rate, duration, and endothelial cell loss (ECL) between surgeons (P > 0.05). ECL was evaluated as an average of 5 readings on randomly selected graft areas, not including graft periphery. Fifteen additional research corneas were stripped by 1 single user in an eye bank setting. No tissue loss was recorded, whereas ECL and mortality rate remained unaffected after preparation (P = 0.64 and P = 0.72, respectively). This new DMEK graft preparation technique, simulating the opening of a yogurt cup, seems to be a safe and an efficient method, providing shorter preparation time and low failure rates independent of surgeon's experience level.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32568799
doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002401
pii: 00003226-202009000-00024
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Video-Audio Media
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1190-1195Références
Anshu A, Price MO, Tan DT, et al. Endothelial keratoplasty: a revolution in evolution. Surv Ophthalmol. 2012;57:236–252.
Park CY, Lee JK, Gore PK, et al. Keratoplasty in the United States: a 10-year review from 2005 through 2014. Ophthalmology. 2015;122:2432–2442.
Price MO, Price FW Jr. Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty surgery: update on the evidence and hurdles to acceptance. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2013;24:329–335.
Woo JH, Ang M, Htoon HM, et al. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty versus Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019;207:288–303.
Eye Bank Association of America. 2015 Eye Banking Statistical Report. Washington, DC. Eye Bank Association of America; 2016.
Melles GR, Ong TS, Ververs B, et al. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Cornea. 2006;25:987–990.
Lang SJ, Bischoff M, Böhringer D, et al. Analysis of the changes in keratoplasty indications and preferred techniques. PLoS One. 2014;9:e112696.
Zafar S, Parker JS, de Kort C, et al. Perceived difficulties and barriers to uptake of Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty among surgeons. Clin Ophthalmol. 2019;13:1055–1061.
Livny E, Groeneveld-vanBeek EA, Lie JT, et al. Minimizing graft preparation failure in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2017;36:1452–1457.
Birbal RS, Sikder S, Lie JT, et al. Donor tissue preparation for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: an updated review. Cornea. 2018;37:128–135.
Parekh M, Borroni D, Ruzza A, et al. A comparative study on different Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty graft preparation techniques. Acta Ophthalmol. 2018;96:e718–e726.
Busin M, Scorcia V, Patel AK, et al. Pneumatic dissection and storage of donor endothelial tissue for Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty: a novel technique. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:1517–1520.
Groeneveld-van Beek EA, Lie JT, van der Wees J, et al. Standardized ‘no-touch’ donor tissue preparation for DALK and DMEK: harvesting undamaged anterior and posterior transplants from the same donor cornea. Acta Ophthalmol. 2013;91:145–150.
Dapena I, Moutsouris K, Droutsas K, et al. Standardized “no-touch” technique for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol. 2011;129:88–94.
Parekh M, Ruzza A, Salvalaio G, et al. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty tissue preparation from donor corneas using a standardized submerged hydro-separation method. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;158:277–285.e1.
Muraine M, Gueudry J, He Z, et al. Novel technique for the preparation of corneal grafts for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;156:851–859.
Parekh M, Baruzzo M, Favaro E, et al. Standardizing Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty graft preparation method in the eye bank-experience of 527 Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty tissues. Cornea. 2017;36:1458–1466.
Gorovoy IR, Cui QN, Gorovoy MS. Donor tissue characteristics in preparation of DMEK grafts. Cornea. 2014;33:683–685.
Schlötzer-Schrehardt U, Bachmann BO, Tourtas T, et al. Ultrastructure of the posterior corneal stroma. Ophthalmology. 2015;122:693–699.
Sella R, Einan-Lifshitz A, Sorkin N, et al. Learning curve of two common Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty graft preparation techniques. Can J Ophthalmol. 2019;54:467–472.
Tan TE, Devarajan K, Seah XY, et al. Lamellar dissection technique for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty graft preparation. Cornea. 2020;39:23–29.
Greiner MA, Rixen JJ, Wagoner MD, et al. Diabetes mellitus increases risk of unsuccessful graft preparation in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: a multicenter study. Cornea. 2014;33:1129–1133.
Price MO, Lisek M, Feng MT, et al. Effect of donor and recipient diabetes status on descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty adherence and survival. Cornea. 2017;36:1184–1188.