The Effect of Padded Adhesive Dressing and Static Body Position on Sacral Interface Pressure.
Journal
Journal of patient safety
ISSN: 1549-8425
Titre abrégé: J Patient Saf
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101233393
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 12 2021
01 12 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
23
6
2020
medline:
24
2
2022
entrez:
23
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Padded adhesive bandages are frequently used in the inpatient setting for sacral pressure injury prevention, but it is unclear whether they truly decrease interface pressure. We hypothesized such devices reduce sacral peak interface pressure in the supine position, which would be further reduced in 30-degree reclined and upright seated positions. Study participants rested with their sacrum on a pressure-sensing mat, in 3 positions, for 30 seconds each: (1) sitting upright; (2) supine; and (3) supine against 30-degree wedge. Measurements were made with and without a padded adhesive bandage overlying the sacrum. Age, sex, and body mass index (BMI) were collected. These variables were entered sequentially, in an a priori order to construct a linear mixed-effects model. Forty healthy adults participated. After controlling for by-subject variation, age, and sex, BMI did not influence peak sacral pressure (P = 0.22), although the effect of body position was significant (P < 0.01). Subsequent addition of padded adhesive dressing was nonsignificant (P = 0.17); sacral peak pressure was similar with a padded adhesive dressing (247.8 ± 147.3 mm Hg) or without (mean ± standard deviation = 229.8 ± 127.7 mm Hg). Lastly, there was no significant interaction between BMI and body position (P = 0.11). Padded adhesive bandages did not reduce interface pressure in any position. Sacral pressure was highest in the supine position and was not specifically affected by BMI. If padded bandages provide clinically significant reduction in pressure injury incidence, it is not simply through the reduction of interface pressure.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32569097
pii: 01209203-202112000-00162
doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000728
doi:
Substances chimiques
Adhesives
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e1851-e1854Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors disclose no conflict of interest.
Références
Charalambous C, Koulori A, Vasilopoulos A. Evaluation of the validity and reliability of the Waterlow Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Scale. Med Arch . 2018;72:141–144.
Moore ZE, van Etten MT, Dumville JC, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev . 2016;10:CD011999.
Schario M, Tomova-Simitchieva T, Lichterfeld A, et al. Effects of two different fabrics on skin barrier function under real pressure conditions. J Tissue Viability . 2017;26:150–155.
Barakat-Johnson M, Barnett C, Wand T, et al. Knowledge and attitudes of nurses toward pressure injury prevention: a cross-sectional multisite study. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs . 2018;45:233–237.
Cox J, Roche S, Murphy V. Pressure injury risk factors in critical care patients: a descriptive analysis. Adv Skin Wound Care . 2018;31:328–334.
Fulbrook P, Anderson A. Pressure injury risk assessment in intensive care: comparison of inter-rater reliability of the COMHON (Conscious level, Mobility, Haemodynamics, Oxygenation, Nutrition) Index with three scales. J Adv Nurs . 2016;72:680–692.
Moore ZEH, Webster J. Dressings and topical agents for preventing pressure ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev . 2013:CD009362.
Austin JM, Pronovost PJ. “Never events” and the quest to reduce preventable harm. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf . 2015;41:279–288.
Padula WV, Makic MBF, Mishra MK, et al. Comparative effectiveness of quality improvement interventions for pressure ulcer prevention in academic medical centers in the United States. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf . 2015;41:246–256.
Wong AL, Walia GS, Bello R, et al. Pressure ulcer prevalence and perceptions on prevention: a hospital-wide survey of health professionals. J Wound Care . 2018;27(Sup4):S29–S35.
Gillespie BM, Chaboyer W, McInnes E, et al. Repositioning for pressure ulcer prevention in adults (review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev . 2014;4:1–42.
Mepilex Border Sacrum Dressing by Molnlycke Healthcare. Medline [Internet]. Medline . 2017. Available at: https://www.medline.com/product/Mepilex-Border-Sacrum-Dressing-by-Molnlycke-Healthcare/Z05-PF32815/ . Accessed May 19, 2019.
Mandy A, Redhead L, McCudden C, et al. A comparison of vertical reaction forces during propulsion of three different one-arm drive wheelchairs by hemiplegic users. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol . 2014;9:242–247.
Iuchi T, Nakajima Y, Fukuda M, et al. Using an extreme bony prominence anatomical model to examine the influence of bed sheet materials and bed making methods on the distribution of pressure on the support surface. J Tissue Viability . 2014;23:60–68.
Pedersen LK, Martinkevich P, Ege S, et al. Postural seated balance in children can be assessed with good reliability. Gait Posture . 2016;47:68–73.
R Core Team [Internet]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2018. Available at: https://www.r-project.org/ . Accessed May 5, 2020.
Bates D, Machler M, Bolker B, Walker S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using Ime4. J Stat Softw . 2015;67:1–48.
Lenth R. Least-squares means: the R package Ismeans. J Stat Softw . 2016;69:1–33.
Wickham H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2016. Available at: https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org . Accessed May 5, 2020.
Oomens CWJ, Bader DL, Loerakker S, et al. Pressure induced deep tissue injury explained. Ann Biomed Eng . 2015;43:297–305.
Brienza D, Kelsey S, Karg P, et al. A randomized clinical trial on preventing pressure ulcers with wheelchair seat cushions. J Am Geriatr Soc . 2010;58:2308–2314.
Tomova-Simitchieva T, Lichterfeld-Kottner A, Blume-Peytavi U, et al. Comparing the effects of 3 different pressure ulcer prevention support surfaces on the structure and function of heel and sacral skin: an exploratory cross-over trial. Int Wound J . 2018;15:429–437.
García-Molina P, Balaguer-López E, García-Fernández FP. Pressure ulcers’ incidence, preventive measures, and risk factors in neonatal intensive care and intermediate care units. 2018:1–9.
Boyko TV, Longaker MT, Yang GP. Review of the current management of pressure ulcers. Adv Wound Care . 2018;7:57–67.
Heyneman A, Vanderwee K, Grypdonck M, et al. Effectiveness of two cushions in the prevention of heel pressure ulcers. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs . 2009;6:114–120.
Junkin J, Gray M. Are pressure redistribution surfaces or heel protection devices effective for preventing heel pressure ulcers? J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs . 2009;36:602–608.
Call E, Pedersen J, Bill B, et al. Enhancing pressure ulcer prevention using wound dressings: what are the modes of action? Int Wound J . 2015;12:408–413.