Canadian Update on Surgical Procedures (CUSP) Urology Group consensus for intraoperative hemostasis during minimally invasive partial nephrectomy.
Journal
Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada
ISSN: 1911-6470
Titre abrégé: Can Urol Assoc J
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101312644
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2020
Sep 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
23
6
2020
medline:
23
6
2020
entrez:
23
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Partial nephrectomy remains the gold standard in the management of small renal masses. However, minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (MIPN) is associated with a steep learning curve, and optimal, standardized techniques for time-efficient hemostasis are poorly described. Given the relative lack of evidence, the goal was to describe a set of actionable guiding principles, through an expert working panel, for urologists to approach hemostasis without compromising warm ischemia or oncological outcomes. A three-step modified Delphi method was used to achieve expert agreement on the best practices for hemostasis in MIPN. Panelists were recruited from the Canadian Update on Surgical Procedures (CUSP) Urology Group, which represent all provinces, academic and community practices, and fellowship-and non-fellowship-trained surgeons. Thirty-two (round 1) and 46 (round 2) panellists participated in survey questionnaires, and 22 attended the in-person consensus meeting. An initial literature search of 945 articles (230 abstracts) underwent screening and yielded 24 preliminary techniques. Through sequential survey assessment and in-person discussion, a total of 11 strategies were approved. These are temporally distributed prior to tumor resection (five principles), during tumor resection (two principles), and during renorrhaphy (four principles). Given the variability in tumor size, depth, location, and vascularity, coupled with limitations of laparoscopic equipment, achieving consistent hemostasis in MIPN may be challenging. Despite over two decades of MIPN experience, limited evidence exists to guide clinicians. Through a three-step Delphi method and rigorous iterative review with a panel of experts, we ascertained a guiding checklist of principles for newly beginning and practicing urologists to reference.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32569571
pii: cuaj.6579
doi: 10.5489/cuaj.6579
pmc: PMC7492033
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
E387-E393Références
Indian J Urol. 2012 Jan;28(1):3-8
pubmed: 22557709
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013 Jun;23(6):521-5
pubmed: 23414123
Eur Urol Focus. 2019 May;5(3):482-487
pubmed: 29325761
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Sep;28(9):1047-1052
pubmed: 29664692
Eur Urol. 2006 Feb;49(2):337-42; discussion 342-3
pubmed: 16413957
World J Urol. 2015 Oct;33(10):1527-34
pubmed: 25239500
Rev Urol. 2011;13(3):131-8
pubmed: 22110396
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2018 Dec;16(6):e1251-e1256
pubmed: 30122517
ScientificWorldJournal. 2011 Jan 18;11:133-41
pubmed: 21258756
J Endourol. 2015 May;29(5):548-55
pubmed: 25616087
J Endourol. 2013 Oct;27(10):1236-9
pubmed: 23883149
Int J Urol. 2015 Jan;22(1):47-52
pubmed: 25139104
Urology. 2011 Dec;78(6):1435-41
pubmed: 22137714
N Engl J Med. 2010 Feb 18;362(7):624-34
pubmed: 20164486
Cent European J Urol. 2017;70(4):362-367
pubmed: 29410886
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Jan 1;42(1):E50-E55
pubmed: 27172287
J Urol. 2017 Sep;198(3):520-529
pubmed: 28479239
J Robot Surg. 2017 Jun;11(2):223-229
pubmed: 27804062
J Urol. 2019 Apr;201(4):702-708
pubmed: 30395840
Eur Urol. 2015 May;67(5):913-24
pubmed: 25616710
Eur Urol. 2012 Dec;62(6):1023-33
pubmed: 22771266
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Feb 20;35(6):668-680
pubmed: 28095147
J Oncol Pract. 2013 Sep;9(5):e262-7
pubmed: 23943895