Fusobacterium nucleatum persistence and risk of recurrence after preoperative treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer.
Fusobacterium nucleatum
locally advanced rectal cancer
microbiome
preoperative chemoradiotherapy
Journal
Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology
ISSN: 1569-8041
Titre abrégé: Ann Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9007735
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2020
10 2020
Historique:
received:
09
04
2020
revised:
04
06
2020
accepted:
05
06
2020
pubmed:
23
6
2020
medline:
7
1
2021
entrez:
23
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Accumulating evidence has identified Fusobacterium as an important pathogenic gut bacterium associated with colorectal cancer. Nevertheless, only limited data exist about the role of this bacterium in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). In this study, we quantified Fusobacterium nucleatum in untreated and post-neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) samples from LARC patients and investigated its association with therapy response and survival. A total of 254 samples from 143 patients with rectal adenocarcinomas were analyzed for the presence and abundance of F. nucleatum using RNA in situ hybridization and digital image analysis. Assay accuracy was determined using infected cell lines and tumor samples with available quantitative PCR data. We studied the impact of F. nucleatum load on pathologic complete response and relapse-free survival. Treatment-induced changes were evaluated in paired pre- and post-nCRT samples (n = 71). Finally, tumor microenvironment changes during nCRT were assessed in paired samples (n = 45) by immune contexture analysis. F. nucleatum tissue levels by RNA in situ hybridization strongly correlated with quantitative PCR (r = 0.804, P < 0.001). F. nucleatum abundance was higher in untreated [median, 7.4; 95% confidence interval (3.7-16.2)] compared with treated [median, 1.6; 95% confidence interval (1.3-2.4)] tumors (P <0.001) with 58% (73/126) and 26% (22/85) positive tumors, respectively (P < 0.001). Baseline F. nucleatum levels were not associated with pathologic complete response. F. nucleatum positivity after nCRT, but not baseline status, significantly increased risk of relapse [hazard ratio = 7.5, 95% confidence interval (3.0-19.0); P < 0.001]. Tumors that turned F. nucleatum-negative after nCRT had a strong increase in CD8+ T cells post-nCRT (P < 0.001), while those that persisted F. nucleatum-positive after nCRT lacked CD8+ T cells induction in post-nCRT samples compared with baseline (P = 0.69). F. nucleatum persistence post-nCRT is associated with high relapse rates in LARC, potentially linked to suppression of immune cytotoxicity.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Accumulating evidence has identified Fusobacterium as an important pathogenic gut bacterium associated with colorectal cancer. Nevertheless, only limited data exist about the role of this bacterium in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). In this study, we quantified Fusobacterium nucleatum in untreated and post-neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) samples from LARC patients and investigated its association with therapy response and survival.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
A total of 254 samples from 143 patients with rectal adenocarcinomas were analyzed for the presence and abundance of F. nucleatum using RNA in situ hybridization and digital image analysis. Assay accuracy was determined using infected cell lines and tumor samples with available quantitative PCR data. We studied the impact of F. nucleatum load on pathologic complete response and relapse-free survival. Treatment-induced changes were evaluated in paired pre- and post-nCRT samples (n = 71). Finally, tumor microenvironment changes during nCRT were assessed in paired samples (n = 45) by immune contexture analysis.
RESULTS
F. nucleatum tissue levels by RNA in situ hybridization strongly correlated with quantitative PCR (r = 0.804, P < 0.001). F. nucleatum abundance was higher in untreated [median, 7.4; 95% confidence interval (3.7-16.2)] compared with treated [median, 1.6; 95% confidence interval (1.3-2.4)] tumors (P <0.001) with 58% (73/126) and 26% (22/85) positive tumors, respectively (P < 0.001). Baseline F. nucleatum levels were not associated with pathologic complete response. F. nucleatum positivity after nCRT, but not baseline status, significantly increased risk of relapse [hazard ratio = 7.5, 95% confidence interval (3.0-19.0); P < 0.001]. Tumors that turned F. nucleatum-negative after nCRT had a strong increase in CD8+ T cells post-nCRT (P < 0.001), while those that persisted F. nucleatum-positive after nCRT lacked CD8+ T cells induction in post-nCRT samples compared with baseline (P = 0.69).
CONCLUSION
F. nucleatum persistence post-nCRT is associated with high relapse rates in LARC, potentially linked to suppression of immune cytotoxicity.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32569727
pii: S0923-7534(20)39890-2
doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.06.003
pmc: PMC7542577
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1366-1375Subventions
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : C17937/A29070
Pays : United Kingdom
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Disclosure JT reports personal financial interest in the form of scientific consultancy role for Array Biopharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BeiGene, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Genentech, Inc., Genmab A/S, Halozyme, Imugene Limited, Inflection Biosciences Limited, Ipsen, Kura Oncology, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Menarini, Merck Serono, Merrimack, Merus, Molecular Partners, Novartis, Peptomyc, Pfizer, Pharmacyclics, ProteoDesign SL, Rafael Pharmaceuticals, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Sanofi, SeaGen, Seattle Genetics, Servier, Symphogen, Taiho, VCN Biosciences, Biocartis, Foundation Medicine, HalioDX SAS, and Roche Diagnostics. JC reports scientific consultancy role (speaker and advisory roles) from Novartis, Pfizer, Ipsen, Exelixis, Bayer, Eisai, Advanced Accelerator Applications, Amgen, Sanofi, ITM, Sirlex and Merck Serono. Research grants from Novartis, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Advanced Accelerator Applications, Eisai, and Bayer. RD has an advisory role at Roche and Boehringer-Ingelheim, has received a speaker’s fee from Roche, Ipsen, Amgen, Sanofi, Servier, Merck Sharp & Dohme and further received direct research funding from Merck and Pierre Fabre. PN has consulted for Bayer, Novartis, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Targos, and received compensation. The other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Références
N Engl J Med. 2004 Oct 21;351(17):1731-40
pubmed: 15496622
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Aug;1(5):653-61
pubmed: 26181352
J Clin Oncol. 2014 May 20;32(15):1554-62
pubmed: 24752056
Science. 2017 Dec 15;358(6369):1443-1448
pubmed: 29170280
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Dec 23;111(51):18321-6
pubmed: 25489084
Cancer Sci. 2018 Apr;109(4):966-979
pubmed: 29464828
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Aug 20;23(24):5620-7
pubmed: 16009958
Br J Cancer. 2010 Sep 28;103(7):1019-24
pubmed: 20842128
Cell. 2017 Jul 27;170(3):548-563.e16
pubmed: 28753429
Ann Oncol. 2019 Mar 1;30(3):360-361
pubmed: 30698643
Immunity. 2015 Feb 17;42(2):344-355
pubmed: 25680274
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Sep 1;72(1):99-107
pubmed: 18407433
Nat Med. 2018 Oct;24(10):1526-1531
pubmed: 30150717
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Jul;20(7):2166-71
pubmed: 23456389
J Clin Oncol. 2012 May 20;30(15):1770-6
pubmed: 22493423
Int J Mol Sci. 2017 Mar 07;18(3):
pubmed: 28272347
Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2018 Oct;67(10):1635-1646
pubmed: 30121899
Genome Res. 2012 Feb;22(2):299-306
pubmed: 22009989
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2018 Mar 15;10(3):71-81
pubmed: 29564037
Gut. 2016 Dec;65(12):1973-1980
pubmed: 26311717
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Jun 20;32(18):1927-34
pubmed: 24799484
Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Sep 15;25(18):5561-5571
pubmed: 31253631
Science. 2015 Nov 27;350(6264):1084-9
pubmed: 26541606
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Jun 23;106(7):
pubmed: 24957073
Nat Med. 2018 Oct;24(10):1495-1496
pubmed: 30275567
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2016 Jul;9(4):594-605
pubmed: 27366226
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2015 Mar 1;308(5):G351-63
pubmed: 25540232
Int J Cancer. 2015 Sep 15;137(6):1258-68
pubmed: 25703934
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Aug;23(8):2548-55
pubmed: 27020587
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2016 Nov 3;7(11):e200
pubmed: 27811909
Cancer Res. 2014 Mar 1;74(5):1311-8
pubmed: 24385213
Genome Res. 2012 Feb;22(2):292-8
pubmed: 22009990
Infect Immun. 2010 Nov;78(11):4773-8
pubmed: 20823215
Science. 2013 Nov 22;342(6161):967-70
pubmed: 24264989
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Oct 1;29(28):3753-60
pubmed: 21876084