Consensus for experimental design in electromyography (CEDE) project: Amplitude normalization matrix.
Amplitude normalization
Consensus
Electromyography
Muscle activation
Journal
Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology
ISSN: 1873-5711
Titre abrégé: J Electromyogr Kinesiol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9109125
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2020
Aug 2020
Historique:
received:
09
04
2020
revised:
03
06
2020
accepted:
05
06
2020
pubmed:
23
6
2020
medline:
11
11
2020
entrez:
23
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The general purpose of normalization of EMG amplitude is to enable comparisons between participants, muscles, measurement sessions or electrode positions. Normalization is necessary to reduce the impact of differences in physiological and anatomical characteristics of muscles and surrounding tissues. Normalization of the EMG amplitude provides information about the magnitude of muscle activation relative to a reference value. It is essential to select an appropriate method for normalization with specific reference to how the EMG signal will be interpreted, and to consider how the normalized EMG amplitude may change when interpreting it under specific conditions. This matrix, developed by the Consensus for Experimental Design in Electromyography (CEDE) project, presents six approaches to EMG normalization: (1) Maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) in same task/context as the task of interest, (2) Standardized isometric MVC (which is not necessarily matched to the contraction type in the task of interest), (3) Standardized submaximal task (isometric/dynamic) that can be task-specific, (4) Peak/mean EMG amplitude in task, (5) Non-normalized, and (6) Maximal M-wave. General considerations for normalization, features that should be reported, definitions, and "pros and cons" of each normalization approach are presented first. This information is followed by recommendations for specific experimental contexts, along with an explanation of the factors that determine the suitability of a method, and frequently asked questions. This matrix is intended to help researchers when selecting, reporting and interpreting EMG amplitude data.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32569878
pii: S1050-6411(20)30080-8
doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2020.102438
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
102438Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest None declared.