Risk factors for parastomal hernia of loop stoma and relationships with other stoma complications in laparoscopic surgery era.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Colostomy
/ adverse effects
Enterostomy
/ adverse effects
Female
Hernia, Ventral
/ diagnostic imaging
Humans
Ileostomy
/ adverse effects
Incidence
Laparoscopy
/ adverse effects
Male
Middle Aged
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Surgical Mesh
Surgical Stomas
/ adverse effects
Laparoscopic surgery
Parastomal hernia
Peristomal skin disorders
Risk factors
Stoma-related complications
Journal
BMC surgery
ISSN: 1471-2482
Titre abrégé: BMC Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968567
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 Jun 2020
22 Jun 2020
Historique:
received:
08
07
2019
accepted:
18
06
2020
entrez:
24
6
2020
pubmed:
24
6
2020
medline:
22
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Laparoscopic approach is now a widespread technique used worldwide, but there are few recent studies on risk factors for parastomal hernia. Therefore, this study was performed to analyze the incidence of parastomal hernia in laparoscopic and open surgery in which a loop stoma was created and was intended to be temporary, and to determine risk factors for parastomal hernia formation. Associations between parastomal hernia and other stoma-related complications were also analyzed. A retrospective analysis of patient and surgical characteristics was performed in 153 consecutive patients who underwent a temporary diverting loop ileostomy or colostomy after surgery related to malignant diseases at our hospital from January to December 2016. Parastomal hernia developed in 77 cases (50.3%), including 39 (25.5%) diagnosed by physical examination and 38 (24.8%) detected by CT alone. On multivariate analysis, a stoma not passing through the middle of the rectus abdominis muscle was the only independent risk factor for parastomal hernia formation (p = 0.005) during the median follow-up of 245.0 days. When we analyzed the factors that were associated with a stoma not passing through the middle of the rectus abdominis muscle, the only independent factor associated with this misplacement of the stoma was a laparoscopic approach (p = 0.012). An analysis of stoma-related complications showed that peristomal skin disorders were significantly associated with parastomal hernia (p = 0.049). This study showed that a stoma that is not formed through the middle of the rectus abdominis muscle is a risk factor for parastomal hernia formation, and that a laparoscopic approach is associated with this risk factor. Moreover, parastomal hernia is significantly associated with peristomal skin disorders.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Laparoscopic approach is now a widespread technique used worldwide, but there are few recent studies on risk factors for parastomal hernia. Therefore, this study was performed to analyze the incidence of parastomal hernia in laparoscopic and open surgery in which a loop stoma was created and was intended to be temporary, and to determine risk factors for parastomal hernia formation. Associations between parastomal hernia and other stoma-related complications were also analyzed.
METHODS
METHODS
A retrospective analysis of patient and surgical characteristics was performed in 153 consecutive patients who underwent a temporary diverting loop ileostomy or colostomy after surgery related to malignant diseases at our hospital from January to December 2016.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Parastomal hernia developed in 77 cases (50.3%), including 39 (25.5%) diagnosed by physical examination and 38 (24.8%) detected by CT alone. On multivariate analysis, a stoma not passing through the middle of the rectus abdominis muscle was the only independent risk factor for parastomal hernia formation (p = 0.005) during the median follow-up of 245.0 days. When we analyzed the factors that were associated with a stoma not passing through the middle of the rectus abdominis muscle, the only independent factor associated with this misplacement of the stoma was a laparoscopic approach (p = 0.012). An analysis of stoma-related complications showed that peristomal skin disorders were significantly associated with parastomal hernia (p = 0.049).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This study showed that a stoma that is not formed through the middle of the rectus abdominis muscle is a risk factor for parastomal hernia formation, and that a laparoscopic approach is associated with this risk factor. Moreover, parastomal hernia is significantly associated with peristomal skin disorders.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32571293
doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-00802-y
pii: 10.1186/s12893-020-00802-y
pmc: PMC7310075
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
141Références
Surg Today. 2014 Aug;44(8):1465-9
pubmed: 24030376
Dig Surg. 2014;31(4-5):366-76
pubmed: 25531238
Ann Surg. 2017 Jul;266(1):111-117
pubmed: 27735827
Br J Dermatol. 2011 Feb;164(2):330-5
pubmed: 20973766
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Feb;21(2):507-12
pubmed: 24085329
Br J Surg. 1998 Jan;85(1):76-9
pubmed: 9462389
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37813
pubmed: 22679479
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Sep;32(9):1357-1362
pubmed: 28667499
Colorectal Dis. 2009 Feb;11(2):173-7
pubmed: 18462232
Colorectal Dis. 2008 Oct;10(8):785-8
pubmed: 18190612
Tech Coloproctol. 2014 Sep;18(9):855-6
pubmed: 24718776
Pol Przegl Chir. 2015 Mar 01;87(1):31-4
pubmed: 25803066
World J Surg. 2017 Aug;41(8):2168-2177
pubmed: 28289834
Hernia. 2018 Apr;22(2):379-384
pubmed: 29305784
Hernia. 2018 Feb;22(1):183-198
pubmed: 29134456
Br J Surg. 1988 Apr;75(4):339-41
pubmed: 2965951
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Jun;202(6):W506-11
pubmed: 24848843
Colorectal Dis. 2016 Jan;18(1):59-66
pubmed: 26391723
Ann Surg. 2007 Aug;246(2):207-14
pubmed: 17667498
Br J Nurs. 2010 Aug 12-Sep 8;19(15):960, 932-4
pubmed: 20966862
Br J Surg. 1988 May;75(5):416-8
pubmed: 3390668
Surg Endosc. 2016 Nov;30(11):4809-4816
pubmed: 26902615
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2008 Feb;21(1):23-30
pubmed: 20011393
Surg Clin North Am. 2013 Feb;93(1):145-66
pubmed: 23177069
Int J Dermatol. 2018 Mar;57(3):257-264
pubmed: 28833037
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012 Oct;22(5):420-3
pubmed: 23047385
Br J Surg. 2005 Feb;92(2):211-6
pubmed: 15584062