Critical Reliability Issues of Common Type Alcohol-Based Handrub Dispensers.

Alcohol-based handrub Dispenser quality Hand hygiene Hand sanitizer Handrub dosing Handrub volume Patient safety standards

Journal

Antimicrobial resistance and infection control
ISSN: 2047-2994
Titre abrégé: Antimicrob Resist Infect Control
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101585411

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
22 06 2020
Historique:
received: 10 12 2019
accepted: 09 05 2020
entrez: 24 6 2020
pubmed: 24 6 2020
medline: 2 4 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Hand hygiene can only be efficient if the whole hand surface is treated with sufficient alcohol-based handrub (ABHR); therefore, the volume of handrub applied is a critical factor in patient safety. The proper amount of ABHR should be provided by handrub dispensers. The aim of this study was to investigate the dispensing performance of wall-mounted ABHR dispensers commonly employed in hospital settings. In a multicenter study, we tested 46 dispensers (22 in laboratory and 24 in clinical environments), measuring dispensed ABHR volume during continuous use and after a period of non-use. The influence of the pumping mechanism, liquid level, ABHR formats, handrub composition, temperature, and atmospheric pressure was investigated. A total of 7 out of the 22 investigated dispensers (32%) lost a significant amount of handrub; greater than 30% of the nominal volume after 8 h of non-use, thus frequently dispensing suboptimal volume, as measured in laboratory settings. Key influencing factors were found to be handrub format (gel or liquid), handrub level in the container and type of dispenser. When gel ABHR was used, after 4 h of non-use of the dispensers, the volume of the dispensed amount of ABHR insignificantly changed (97% of the original amount), while it technically decreased to zero in the case of liquid ABHR (1% of the original amount). The liquid level had a medium effect on the dispensed volume in each investigated case; the magnitude of this effect varied widely depending on the dispensing mechanism. When dispensers were in continuous use, they dispensed a cumulated 3 mL of ABHR from two consecutive pushes, while when they were not in use for 1 h, up to 4 consecutive pushes were necessary to provide a total of 3 mL ABHR. Design and production quality were also identified as important contributing factors with respect to the volume dispensed. Data collected in clinical settings confirmed these findings, for multiple types of dispensers. All ABHR dispensers should be regularly audited to control the reference volume distributed, with particular attention paid to regular mechanical pump units filled with liquid handrub.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Hand hygiene can only be efficient if the whole hand surface is treated with sufficient alcohol-based handrub (ABHR); therefore, the volume of handrub applied is a critical factor in patient safety. The proper amount of ABHR should be provided by handrub dispensers. The aim of this study was to investigate the dispensing performance of wall-mounted ABHR dispensers commonly employed in hospital settings.
METHOD
In a multicenter study, we tested 46 dispensers (22 in laboratory and 24 in clinical environments), measuring dispensed ABHR volume during continuous use and after a period of non-use. The influence of the pumping mechanism, liquid level, ABHR formats, handrub composition, temperature, and atmospheric pressure was investigated.
RESULTS
A total of 7 out of the 22 investigated dispensers (32%) lost a significant amount of handrub; greater than 30% of the nominal volume after 8 h of non-use, thus frequently dispensing suboptimal volume, as measured in laboratory settings. Key influencing factors were found to be handrub format (gel or liquid), handrub level in the container and type of dispenser. When gel ABHR was used, after 4 h of non-use of the dispensers, the volume of the dispensed amount of ABHR insignificantly changed (97% of the original amount), while it technically decreased to zero in the case of liquid ABHR (1% of the original amount). The liquid level had a medium effect on the dispensed volume in each investigated case; the magnitude of this effect varied widely depending on the dispensing mechanism. When dispensers were in continuous use, they dispensed a cumulated 3 mL of ABHR from two consecutive pushes, while when they were not in use for 1 h, up to 4 consecutive pushes were necessary to provide a total of 3 mL ABHR. Design and production quality were also identified as important contributing factors with respect to the volume dispensed. Data collected in clinical settings confirmed these findings, for multiple types of dispensers.
CONCLUSION
All ABHR dispensers should be regularly audited to control the reference volume distributed, with particular attention paid to regular mechanical pump units filled with liquid handrub.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32571388
doi: 10.1186/s13756-020-00735-4
pii: 10.1186/s13756-020-00735-4
pmc: PMC7310242
doi:

Substances chimiques

Ethanol 3K9958V90M

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

90

Références

BMC Infect Dis. 2013 May 30;13:249
pubmed: 23718728
Am J Infect Control. 2016 Dec 1;44(12):1689-1691
pubmed: 27566875
GMS Krankenhhyg Interdiszip. 2012;7(1):Doc03
pubmed: 22558037
J Hosp Infect. 2019 Apr;101(4):383-392
pubmed: 30237118
Am J Infect Control. 2002 Oct;30(6):373-5
pubmed: 12360146
Orv Hetil. 2017 Jul;158(29):1143-1148
pubmed: 28714331
Future Microbiol. 2011 Aug;6(8):855-76
pubmed: 21861619
BMC Infect Dis. 2013 Oct 10;13:472
pubmed: 24112994
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016 Feb;37(2):219-21
pubmed: 26598073

Auteurs

Száva Bánsághi (S)

Department of Epidemiology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.

Hervé Soule (H)

University of Geneva Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine (HUG), Geneva, Switzerland.

Chloé Guitart (C)

University of Geneva Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine (HUG), Geneva, Switzerland.

Didier Pittet (D)

University of Geneva Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine (HUG), Geneva, Switzerland.

Tamás Haidegger (T)

University Research and Innovation Center (EKIK), Óbuda University, Budapest, Hungary. haidegger@irob.uni-obuda.hu.
Austrian Center for Medical Innovation and Technology (ACMIT), Wiener Neustadt, Austria. haidegger@irob.uni-obuda.hu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH