Assessing the completeness of infant and childhood immunizations within a provincial registry populated by parental reporting: A study using linked databases in Ontario, Canada.
Electronic health records
Electronic medical records
Immunization coverage
Immunization registries
Immunization registry
Validation
Journal
Vaccine
ISSN: 1873-2518
Titre abrégé: Vaccine
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8406899
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 07 2020
14 07 2020
Historique:
received:
17
09
2019
revised:
28
05
2020
accepted:
01
06
2020
pubmed:
24
6
2020
medline:
28
4
2021
entrez:
24
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In Ontario, Canada, parents have the responsibility to report their child's routine infant and childhood vaccines to the provincial immunization registry (the Digital Health Immunization Repository; DHIR) without healthcare provider validation. Despite its use in routine immunization coverage monitoring, no study has previously examined the completeness of immunization data within the DHIR. We assessed the completeness of DHIR immunizations, as compared to immunizations within the Electronic Medical Records-Primary Care (EMRPC) database, also known as EMRALD, a network of family physician electronic medical records (EMRs). We linked client records from the DHIR and EMRPC to a centralized population file. To create the study cohort, we examined children born during 2005-2008 and further defined the cohort based on those rostered to an EMRPC physician, visit criteria to ensure ongoing care by an EMRPC provider, and school attendance in Ontario at age 7. We calculated up-to-date (UTD) immunization coverage at age 7 for individual vaccines and overall using data from the DHIR and EMRPC separately, and compared the estimates. The analytic cohort to assess DHIR data completeness included 2,657 children. Overall UTD coverage (all vaccines assessed) was 82.0% in the DHIR and 67.6% in EMRPC. UTD coverage was higher in the DHIR for all vaccines assessed individually, with the exception of meningococcal C conjugate vaccine (difference = 0.3%). After excluding two EMRPC sites with irregularities in immunization data, the difference in overall UTD coverage between systems decreased from 14.4% to 6.6% INTERPRETATION: These results validate the use of DHIR for coverage assessment but also suggest that bidirectional exchange of immunization information has the potential to increase immunization data completeness in both systems.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32571722
pii: S0264-410X(20)30764-7
doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.06.003
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
5223-5230Informations de copyright
Crown Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.