Validation of a digital pathology system including remote review during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Journal
Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc
ISSN: 1530-0285
Titre abrégé: Mod Pathol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8806605
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2020
11 2020
Historique:
received:
11
05
2020
accepted:
04
06
2020
revised:
03
06
2020
pubmed:
24
6
2020
medline:
30
10
2020
entrez:
24
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Remote digital pathology allows healthcare systems to maintain pathology operations during public health emergencies. Existing Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments regulations require pathologists to electronically verify patient reports from a certified facility. During the 2019 pandemic of COVID-19 disease, caused by the SAR-CoV-2 virus, this requirement potentially exposes pathologists, their colleagues, and household members to the risk of becoming infected. Relaxation of government enforcement of this regulation allows pathologists to review and report pathology specimens from a remote, non-CLIA certified facility. The availability of digital pathology systems can facilitate remote microscopic diagnosis, although formal comprehensive (case-based) validation of remote digital diagnosis has not been reported. All glass slides representing routine clinical signout workload in surgical pathology subspecialties at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center were scanned on an Aperio GT450 at ×40 equivalent resolution (0.26 µm/pixel). Twelve pathologists from nine surgical pathology subspecialties remotely reviewed and reported complete pathology cases using a digital pathology system from a non-CLIA certified facility through a secure connection. Whole slide images were integrated to and launched within the laboratory information system to a custom vendor-agnostic, whole slide image viewer. Remote signouts utilized consumer-grade computers and monitors (monitor size, 13.3-42 in.; resolution, 1280 × 800-3840 × 2160 pixels) connecting to an institution clinical workstation via secure virtual private network. Pathologists subsequently reviewed all corresponding glass slides using a light microscope within the CLIA-certified department. Intraobserver concordance metrics included reporting elements of top-line diagnosis, margin status, lymphovascular and/or perineural invasion, pathology stage, and ancillary testing. The median whole slide image file size was 1.3 GB; scan time/slide averaged 90 s; and scanned tissue area averaged 612 mm
Identifiants
pubmed: 32572154
doi: 10.1038/s41379-020-0601-5
pii: S0893-3952(22)00435-5
pmc: PMC7306935
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Validation Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2115-2127Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA008748
Pays : United States
Références
Diagn Pathol. 2014;9 Suppl 1:S1
pubmed: 25564940
J Pathol Inform. 2014 Feb 25;5(1):5
pubmed: 24741464
J Pathol Inform. 2012;3:45
pubmed: 23372986
Histopathology. 2016 Jun;68(7):1063-72
pubmed: 26409165
J Clin Pathol. 2014 Dec;67(12):1052-5
pubmed: 25248822
J Pathol Inform. 2019 Sep 27;10:31
pubmed: 31620310
J Clin Pathol. 2016 Sep;69(9):784-92
pubmed: 26873939
Am J Surg Pathol. 2018 Jan;42(1):39-52
pubmed: 28961557
J Renal Inj Prev. 2014 Dec 01;3(4):91-6
pubmed: 25610886
Pathol Int. 2017 Nov;67(11):547-554
pubmed: 28980740
Hum Pathol. 2012 May;43(5):702-7
pubmed: 21937077
Diagn Pathol. 2014;9 Suppl 1:S2
pubmed: 25565398
J Pathol Inform. 2017 Sep 07;8:32
pubmed: 28966832
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2020 Oct 1;144(10):1245-1253
pubmed: 32057275
J Pathol Inform. 2016 Mar 01;7:10
pubmed: 27076988
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2011 Mar;135(3):372-8
pubmed: 21366463
J Pathol Inform. 2014 Nov 28;5(1):43
pubmed: 25535591
J Pathol Inform. 2017 Dec 19;8:51
pubmed: 29416914
J Clin Pathol. 2012 Feb;65(2):152-8
pubmed: 22031590
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2017 Jan;141(1):151-161
pubmed: 27399211
J Glob Oncol. 2016 Jan 20;2(2):76-82
pubmed: 28717686
Hum Pathol. 2012 Oct;43(10):1739-44
pubmed: 22591912
J Pathol Inform. 2018 Oct 29;9:36
pubmed: 30505622
BMC Clin Pathol. 2006 Apr 27;6:4
pubmed: 16643664
Diagn Pathol. 2014;9 Suppl 1:S12
pubmed: 25565219
Hum Pathol. 2012 Dec;43(12):2318-25
pubmed: 22901465
Mod Pathol. 2019 Jul;32(7):916-928
pubmed: 30778169
J Telemed Telecare. 2018 Aug;24(7):460-464
pubmed: 28537510
Diagn Pathol. 2012 Mar 31;7:35
pubmed: 22463804
J Pathol Inform. 2015 Apr 30;6:18
pubmed: 25969793
J Clin Pathol. 2012 Dec;65(12):1107-11
pubmed: 23093511
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2013 Apr;137(4):518-24
pubmed: 23323732
J Pathol Inform. 2014 Jul 28;5(1):21
pubmed: 25191620
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005 Apr;129(4):459-66
pubmed: 15794667
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2017 Jul;141(7):944-959
pubmed: 28440660
J Clin Pathol. 2013 Mar;66(3):218-23
pubmed: 23204560
Histopathology. 2019 Nov;75(5):621-635
pubmed: 31301690
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2013 Dec;137(12):1710-22
pubmed: 23634907
J Clin Pathol. 2015 Jan;68(1):33-9
pubmed: 25355520
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009 Dec;133(12):1949-53
pubmed: 19961250