Net emission reductions from electric cars and heat pumps in 59 world regions over time.


Journal

Nature sustainability
ISSN: 2398-9629
Titre abrégé: Nat Sustain
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101732409

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2020
Historique:
entrez: 24 6 2020
pubmed: 24 6 2020
medline: 24 6 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Electrification of passenger road transport and household heating features prominently in current and planned policy frameworks to achieve greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets. However, since electricity generation involves using fossil fuels, it is not established where and when the replacement of fossil fuel-based technologies by electric cars and heat pumps can effectively reduce overall emissions. Could electrification policy backfire by promoting their diffusion before electricity is decarbonised? Here, we analyse current and future emissions trade-offs in 59 world regions with heterogeneous households, by combining forward-looking integrated assessment model simulations with bottom-up life-cycle assessment. We show that already under current carbon intensities of electricity generation, electric cars and heat pumps are less emission-intensive than fossil fuel-based alternatives in 53 world regions, representing 95% of global transport and heating demand. Even if future end-use electrification is not matched by rapid power sector decarbonisation, it likely avoids emissions in almost all world regions.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32572385
doi: 10.1038/s41893-020-0488-7
pmc: PMC7308170
mid: EMS85812
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

437-447

Subventions

Organisme : European Research Council
ID : 647224
Pays : International

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests.

Références

Environ Sci Technol. 2018 Apr 17;52(8):4989-4995
pubmed: 29570287
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 May 19;112(20):6277-82
pubmed: 25288741
Environ Sci Technol. 2013 Apr 2;47(7):3482-9
pubmed: 23441588
Clim Change. 2018;151(2):109-129
pubmed: 30930506
Environ Sci Technol. 2016 Oct 18;50(20):10795-10804
pubmed: 27676468
Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Sep 15;49(18):11218-26
pubmed: 26308384
Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Jul 21;49(14):8844-55
pubmed: 26125323

Auteurs

Florian Knobloch (F)

Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Science, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Cambridge Centre for Environment, Energy and Natural Resource Governance (C-EENRG), University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Steef Hanssen (S)

Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Science, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Aileen Lam (A)

Cambridge Centre for Environment, Energy and Natural Resource Governance (C-EENRG), University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Department of Economics, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Macao, Taipa, Macau.

Hector Pollitt (H)

Cambridge Centre for Environment, Energy and Natural Resource Governance (C-EENRG), University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Cambridge Econometrics Ltd, Cambridge, UK.

Pablo Salas (P)

Cambridge Centre for Environment, Energy and Natural Resource Governance (C-EENRG), University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
University of Cambridge Institute for Sustainability Leadership, Cambridge, UK.

Unnada Chewpreecha (U)

Cambridge Econometrics Ltd, Cambridge, UK.

Mark A J Huijbregts (MAJ)

Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Science, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Jean-Francois Mercure (JF)

Department of Geography, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Science, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Cambridge Centre for Environment, Energy and Natural Resource Governance (C-EENRG), University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Cambridge Econometrics Ltd, Cambridge, UK.

Classifications MeSH