Assessment of spatial neglect in clinical practice: A nationwide survey.
Brain injuries
Perceptual disorders
Spatial neglect
Stroke
Surveys and questionnaires
Symptom assessment
Journal
Neuropsychological rehabilitation
ISSN: 1464-0694
Titre abrégé: Neuropsychol Rehabil
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9112672
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2021
Oct 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
24
6
2020
medline:
26
11
2021
entrez:
24
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study was part of a nationwide, anonymous, open Internet survey conducted amongst healthcare professionals in Denmark on the assessment and treatment of spatial neglect (SN). The objective was to describe knowledge and practices in the assessment of SN in current clinical practice across different healthcare sectors and professions. Data included the perceived prevalence, assessment methods and observations, subtypes and differential diagnostics of SN. A total of 525 professionals participated in the survey. The vast majority (81.5%) reported that assessment of SN was provided by their workplace. The median of perceived prevalence of SN was 35% (IQR 22-51) but major differences were found between professions. Occupational therapists and psychologists appeared to be most involved in assessment, whilst nursing staff and speech therapists were least involved. Subjective observations were the most common assessment method (90%). Conversely, systematic ADL observations, paper-and-pencil tests, confrontational tests and computerized tests were less common. The survey revealed large differences in the assessment methods and awareness of various aspects of SN symptoms (subtypes and differential diagnostics) between different healthcare professions. The results emphasize the need for international multidisciplinary clinical guidelines on how to assess SN and distinguish between different subtypes and differential diagnoses.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32573333
doi: 10.1080/09602011.2020.1778490
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1374-1389Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn