Smartphone Self-Monitoring by Young Adolescents and Parents to Assess and Improve Family Functioning: Qualitative Feasibility Study.
adolescents
conflict
ecological momentary assessment
mHealth
mobile phone
parenting
self-monitoring
smartphones
Journal
JMIR formative research
ISSN: 2561-326X
Titre abrégé: JMIR Form Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101726394
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 Jun 2020
23 Jun 2020
Historique:
received:
06
08
2019
accepted:
29
03
2020
revised:
14
01
2020
entrez:
24
6
2020
pubmed:
24
6
2020
medline:
24
6
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The natural integration of mobile phones into the daily routines of families provides novel opportunities to study and support family functioning and the quality of interactions between family members in real time. This study aimed to examine user experiences of feasibility, acceptability, and reactivity (ie, changes in awareness and behaviors) of using a smartphone app for self-monitoring of family functioning with 36 participants across 15 family dyads and triads of young adolescents aged 10 to 14 years and their parents. Participants were recruited from 2 family wellness centers in a middle-to-upper income shopping area and a low-income school site. Participants were instructed and prompted by alarms to complete ecological momentary assessments (EMAs) by using a smartphone app over 2 weeks 4 times daily (upon waking in the morning, afternoon, early evening, and end of day at bedtime). The domains assessed included parental monitoring and positive parenting, parent involvement and discipline, parent-child conflict and resolution, positive interactions and support, positive and negative affect, sleep, stress, family meals, and general child and family functioning. Qualitative interviews assessed user experiences generally and with prompts for positive and negative feedback. The participants were primarily white and Latino of mixed-income- and education levels. Children were aged 10 to 14 years, and parents had a mean age of 45 years (range 37-50). EMA response rates were high (95% to over 100%), likely because of cash incentives for EMA completion, engaging content per user feedback, and motivated sample from recruitment sites focused on social-emotional programs for family wellness. Some participants responded for up to 19 days, consistent with some user experience interview feedback of desires to continue participation for up to 3 or 4 weeks. Over 80% (25/31) of participants reported increased awareness of their families' daily routines and functioning of their families. Most also reported positive behavior changes in the following domains: decision making, parental monitoring, quantity and quality of time together, communication, self-regulation of stress and conflict, discipline, and sleep. The results of this study support the feasibility and acceptability of using smartphone EMA by young adolescents and parents for assessing and self-monitoring family daily routines and interactions. The findings also suggest that smartphone self-monitoring may be a useful tool to support improvement in family functioning through functions of reflection on antecedents and consequences of situations, prompting positive and negative alternatives, seeding goals, and reinforcement by self-tracking for self-correction and self-rewards. Future studies should include larger samples with more diverse and higher-risk populations, longer study durations, the inclusion of passive phone sensors and peripheral biometric devices, and integration with counseling and parenting interventions and programs.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The natural integration of mobile phones into the daily routines of families provides novel opportunities to study and support family functioning and the quality of interactions between family members in real time.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to examine user experiences of feasibility, acceptability, and reactivity (ie, changes in awareness and behaviors) of using a smartphone app for self-monitoring of family functioning with 36 participants across 15 family dyads and triads of young adolescents aged 10 to 14 years and their parents.
METHODS
METHODS
Participants were recruited from 2 family wellness centers in a middle-to-upper income shopping area and a low-income school site. Participants were instructed and prompted by alarms to complete ecological momentary assessments (EMAs) by using a smartphone app over 2 weeks 4 times daily (upon waking in the morning, afternoon, early evening, and end of day at bedtime). The domains assessed included parental monitoring and positive parenting, parent involvement and discipline, parent-child conflict and resolution, positive interactions and support, positive and negative affect, sleep, stress, family meals, and general child and family functioning. Qualitative interviews assessed user experiences generally and with prompts for positive and negative feedback.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The participants were primarily white and Latino of mixed-income- and education levels. Children were aged 10 to 14 years, and parents had a mean age of 45 years (range 37-50). EMA response rates were high (95% to over 100%), likely because of cash incentives for EMA completion, engaging content per user feedback, and motivated sample from recruitment sites focused on social-emotional programs for family wellness. Some participants responded for up to 19 days, consistent with some user experience interview feedback of desires to continue participation for up to 3 or 4 weeks. Over 80% (25/31) of participants reported increased awareness of their families' daily routines and functioning of their families. Most also reported positive behavior changes in the following domains: decision making, parental monitoring, quantity and quality of time together, communication, self-regulation of stress and conflict, discipline, and sleep.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The results of this study support the feasibility and acceptability of using smartphone EMA by young adolescents and parents for assessing and self-monitoring family daily routines and interactions. The findings also suggest that smartphone self-monitoring may be a useful tool to support improvement in family functioning through functions of reflection on antecedents and consequences of situations, prompting positive and negative alternatives, seeding goals, and reinforcement by self-tracking for self-correction and self-rewards. Future studies should include larger samples with more diverse and higher-risk populations, longer study durations, the inclusion of passive phone sensors and peripheral biometric devices, and integration with counseling and parenting interventions and programs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32574148
pii: v4i6e15777
doi: 10.2196/15777
pmc: PMC7381003
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e15777Subventions
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : P30 AI028697
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : P30 MH058107
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : U19 HD089886
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR000124
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
©Dallas Swendeman, Stephanie Sumstine, Amber Brink, Deborah Mindry, Melissa Medich, Michael Russell. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (http://formative.jmir.org), 23.06.2020.
Références
Br J Clin Psychol. 2004 Sep;43(Pt 3):245-65
pubmed: 15333231
Br J Health Psychol. 2010 Feb;15(Pt 1):1-39
pubmed: 19646331
Child Dev. 2000 Jul-Aug;71(4):1072-85
pubmed: 11016567
Int J Behav Dev. 2009 Sep 1;33(5):470-478
pubmed: 20186262
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1974 Oct;42(5):704-16
pubmed: 4427011
J Fam Psychol. 2000 Sep;14(3):380-400
pubmed: 11025931
J Fam Psychol. 2009 Dec;23(6):900-904
pubmed: 20001149
Cyberpsychol Behav. 2009 Apr;12(2):131-7
pubmed: 19072078
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2008;4:1-32
pubmed: 18509902
J Fam Psychol. 2006 Dec;20(4):690-700
pubmed: 17176205
Child Dev. 2011 Sep-Oct;82(5):1390-6
pubmed: 21793820
Fam Process. 1994 Jun;33(2):203-16
pubmed: 7925929
Dev Psychopathol. 2011 Aug;23(3):921-38
pubmed: 21756442
J Pediatr Psychol. 2008 Oct;33(9):1046-61; discussion 1062-4
pubmed: 17905801
BMC Public Health. 2011 Jan 31;11:66
pubmed: 21281471
J Fam Psychol. 2002 Dec;16(4):441-4
pubmed: 12561289
Psychol Assess. 2013 Mar;25(1):47-60
pubmed: 23088201
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2016 Mar;19(1):21-38
pubmed: 26541560