Does masting scale with plant size? High reproductive variability and low synchrony in small and unproductive individuals.
Fecundity
mast seeding
plant reproduction
predator satiation
seed predation
super-producers
Journal
Annals of botany
ISSN: 1095-8290
Titre abrégé: Ann Bot
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0372347
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 10 2020
06 10 2020
Historique:
received:
20
04
2020
accepted:
18
06
2020
pubmed:
24
6
2020
medline:
18
11
2020
entrez:
24
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In a range of plant species, the distribution of individual mean fecundity is skewed and dominated by a few highly fecund individuals. Larger plants produce greater seed crops, but the exact nature of the relationship between size and reproductive patterns is poorly understood. This is especially clear in plants that reproduce by exhibiting synchronized quasi-periodic variation in fruit production, a process called masting. We investigated covariation of plant size and fecundity with individual-plant-level masting patterns and seed predation in 12 mast-seeding species: Pinus pinea, Astragalus scaphoides, Sorbus aucuparia, Quercus ilex, Q. humilis, Q. rubra, Q. alba, Q. montana, Chionochloa pallens, C. macra, Celmisia lyallii and Phormium tenax. Fecundity was non-linearly related to masting patterns. Small and unproductive plants frequently failed to produce any seeds, which elevated their annual variation and decreased synchrony. Above a low fecundity threshold, plants had similar variability and synchrony, regardless of their size and productivity. Our study shows that within-species variation in masting patterns is correlated with variation in fecundity, which in turn is related to plant size. Low synchrony of low-fertility plants shows that the failure years were idiosyncratic to each small plant, which in turn implies that the small plants fail to reproduce because of plant-specific factors (e.g. internal resource limits). Thus, the behaviour of these sub-producers is apparently the result of trade-offs in resource allocation and environmental limits with which the small plants cannot cope. Plant size and especially fecundity and propensity for mast failure years play a major role in determining the variability and synchrony of reproduction in plants.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
In a range of plant species, the distribution of individual mean fecundity is skewed and dominated by a few highly fecund individuals. Larger plants produce greater seed crops, but the exact nature of the relationship between size and reproductive patterns is poorly understood. This is especially clear in plants that reproduce by exhibiting synchronized quasi-periodic variation in fruit production, a process called masting.
METHODS
We investigated covariation of plant size and fecundity with individual-plant-level masting patterns and seed predation in 12 mast-seeding species: Pinus pinea, Astragalus scaphoides, Sorbus aucuparia, Quercus ilex, Q. humilis, Q. rubra, Q. alba, Q. montana, Chionochloa pallens, C. macra, Celmisia lyallii and Phormium tenax.
KEY RESULTS
Fecundity was non-linearly related to masting patterns. Small and unproductive plants frequently failed to produce any seeds, which elevated their annual variation and decreased synchrony. Above a low fecundity threshold, plants had similar variability and synchrony, regardless of their size and productivity.
CONCLUSIONS
Our study shows that within-species variation in masting patterns is correlated with variation in fecundity, which in turn is related to plant size. Low synchrony of low-fertility plants shows that the failure years were idiosyncratic to each small plant, which in turn implies that the small plants fail to reproduce because of plant-specific factors (e.g. internal resource limits). Thus, the behaviour of these sub-producers is apparently the result of trade-offs in resource allocation and environmental limits with which the small plants cannot cope. Plant size and especially fecundity and propensity for mast failure years play a major role in determining the variability and synchrony of reproduction in plants.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32574370
pii: 5861603
doi: 10.1093/aob/mcaa118
pmc: PMC7539353
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
971-979Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Références
New Phytol. 2016 Nov;212(3):546-562
pubmed: 27477130
Am Nat. 2019 Aug;194(2):246-259
pubmed: 31318289
New Phytol. 2018 Jul;219(1):98-108
pubmed: 29577320
Ecology. 2008 Mar;89(3):805-17
pubmed: 18459343
Nat Plants. 2020 Feb;6(2):88-94
pubmed: 32042155
Ecology. 2012 May;93(5):1082-94
pubmed: 22764494
Am Nat. 2002 Jul;160(1):44-59
pubmed: 18707498
Ecol Lett. 2013 Jan;16(1):90-8
pubmed: 23113938
Ecology. 2010 Feb;91(2):422-30
pubmed: 20392007
Oecologia. 2003 Nov;137(3):392-8
pubmed: 13680352
Am Nat. 2004 Apr;163(4):591-605
pubmed: 15122505
Ecology. 2018 Nov;99(11):2575-2582
pubmed: 30182480
Oecologia. 2018 Apr;186(4):983-993
pubmed: 29383506
Am Nat. 2008 Feb;171(2):141-9
pubmed: 18197767
Trends Ecol Evol. 1994 Dec;9(12):465-70
pubmed: 21236924
Am Nat. 2007 Jul;170(1):128-42
pubmed: 17853997
Glob Chang Biol. 2020 Mar;26(3):1654-1667
pubmed: 31950581
Ecol Lett. 2009 Nov;12(11):1119-26
pubmed: 19725864
Oecologia. 2013 Jun;172(2):461-7
pubmed: 23080304