Distribution of Geochemical Fractions of Phosphorus in Surface Sediment in Daya Bay, China.
Daya Bay
distribution
fractions of phosphorus
surface sediment
Journal
International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 06 2020
19 06 2020
Historique:
received:
14
05
2020
revised:
16
06
2020
accepted:
16
06
2020
entrez:
25
6
2020
pubmed:
25
6
2020
medline:
21
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Surface sediment samples were collected from 19 sites throughout Daya Bay, China, to study the concentrations, and spatial distributions of different fractions of phosphorus through sequential extraction methods. Like many coastal and marine areas, De-P was the dominant form of P, contributing 47.5% of TP, followed by O-P, contributing 25.5% of TP. Ex-P and Fe-P contribute the lowest to TP. The concentration of sedimentary TP ranged from 290.3~525.1 µg/g, with the average of 395.3 µg/g, which was a similar range to other estuaries and coastal areas. Based on the spatial distribution, Pearson correlation and Principal component analysis, different fractions of phosphorus showed different spatial distributions due to different sources. The molar ratio of organic carbon to phosphorus (TOC/O-P) ranged from 199 to 609, with the average of 413, which was much higher than the Redfield ratio, suggesting terrestrial sources of organic matter in Daya Bay surface sediment. The average bioavailable phosphorus was 149.6 µg/g and contributed 37.8% (24.6~56.0%) of TP, indicating that the surface sediments of Day Bay act as an important internal source of P.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32575652
pii: ijerph17124430
doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124430
pmc: PMC7344842
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Water Pollutants, Chemical
0
Phosphorus
27YLU75U4W
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
Mar Pollut Bull. 2018 Oct;135:318-331
pubmed: 30301044
Environ Monit Assess. 2014 Oct;186(10):6003-15
pubmed: 24879362
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Jan 15;576:840-849
pubmed: 27829206
Mar Pollut Bull. 2019 Dec;149:110540
pubmed: 31470210
Mar Pollut Bull. 2018 Jan;126:51-57
pubmed: 29421132
Mar Pollut Bull. 2013 Nov 15;76(1-2):420-6
pubmed: 24060473
Environ Pollut. 2003;122(3):391-9
pubmed: 12547528
Mar Pollut Bull. 2008 Nov;56(11):1871-9
pubmed: 18783802
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2019 Mar;169:144-149
pubmed: 30445245
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jan 14;16(2):
pubmed: 30646499
Mar Pollut Bull. 2019 Apr;141:61-69
pubmed: 30955774
Mar Pollut Bull. 2020 Jan;150:110808
pubmed: 31910532
Mar Pollut Bull. 2017 Nov 15;124(1):547-554
pubmed: 28778384
Environ Pollut. 2016 May;212:598-604
pubmed: 27016888
Mar Pollut Bull. 2004 Dec;49(11-12):1036-44
pubmed: 15556190
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Feb 10;650(Pt 1):759-768
pubmed: 30308851
Mar Pollut Bull. 2016 Feb 15;103(1-2):325-332
pubmed: 26778499
Mar Pollut Bull. 2014 Jun 15;83(1):343-51
pubmed: 24746356