Evaluation of the completeness of intervention reporting in Cochrane surgical systematic reviews using the TIDieR-SR checklist: a cross-sectional study.


Journal

BMJ evidence-based medicine
ISSN: 2515-4478
Titre abrégé: BMJ Evid Based Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101719009

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 2021
Historique:
accepted: 22 05 2020
pubmed: 25 6 2020
medline: 26 11 2021
entrez: 25 6 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Complete reporting of systematic reviews of interventions is essential to the interpretation of research findings and the reproducibility of research results. The Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist-and the version specific to systematic reviews (TIDieR-SR)-was created to provide authors and researchers an evidence-based guide for reporting trial and systematic review interventions. In this study, we apply TIDieR-SR to Cochrane systematic reviews of surgical interventions. We searched the Cochrane Database for relevant systematic reviews. Two investigators applied inclusion/exclusion criteria to all titles/abstracts and full texts. These same investigators extracted all data in duplicate while masked to the other's data. The primary outcome was adherence to TIDieR-SR items. Two hundred and thirty-eight systematic reviews were included. Overall, included SRs adhered to a median of 6 (IQR 5-7) out of eight TIDieR-SR items. The item with the lowest adherence was item 7 (share intervention materials, 1/238 (0.4%). Our results are encouraging, but the generalisability of our findings is compromised by the inclusion of only Cochrane systematic reviews. Future reporting of intervention materials is likely to improve the application of effective surgical interventions in the clinical practice.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32576569
pii: bmjebm-2020-111417
doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2020-111417
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

51-52

Subventions

Organisme : Department of Health
ID : NIHR300175
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Auteurs

Matt Vassar (M)

Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.

Matthew J Page (MJ)

School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

James Glasbey (J)

Academic Department of Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Craig Cooper (C)

Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.

Austin Jorski (A)

Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.

Jessica Sosio (J)

Medical Student Research, Kansas City University of Medicine and Biosciences, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.

Cole Wayant (C)

Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA cole.wayant@okstate.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH