Creation of consensus recommendations for collaborative practice in the Malaysian psychiatric system: a modified Delphi study.
Collaborative practice
Consensus methods
Delphi method
Guidelines
Malaysia
Mental health
User participation
Journal
International journal of mental health systems
ISSN: 1752-4458
Titre abrégé: Int J Ment Health Syst
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101294224
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
12
03
2020
accepted:
30
05
2020
entrez:
25
6
2020
pubmed:
25
6
2020
medline:
25
6
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
There is strong evidence that collaborative practice in mental healthcare improves outcomes for patients. The concept of collaborative practice can include collaboration between healthcare workers of different professional backgrounds and collaboration with patients, families and communities. Most models of collaborative practice were developed in Western and high-income countries and are not easily translatable to settings which are culturally diverse and lower in resources. This project aimed to develop a set of recommendations to improve collaborative practice in Malaysia. In the first phase, qualitative research was conducted to better understand collaboration in a psychiatric hospital (previously published). In the second phase a local hospital level committee from the same hospital was created to act on the qualitative research and create a set of recommendations to improve collaborative practice at the hospital for the hospital. Some of these recommendations were implemented, where feasible and the outcomes discussed. These recommendations were then sent to a nationwide Delphi panel. These committees consisted of healthcare staff of various professions, patients and carers. The Delphi panel reached consensus after three rounds. The recommendations include ways to improve collaborative problem solving and decision making in the hospital, ways to improve the autonomy and relatedness of patients, carers and staff and ways to improve the levels of resources (e.g. skills training in staff, allowing people with lived experience of mental disorder to contribute). This study showed that the Delphi method is a feasible method of developing recommendations and guidelines in Malaysia and allowed a wider range of stakeholders to contribute than traditional methods of developing guidelines and recommendations.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
There is strong evidence that collaborative practice in mental healthcare improves outcomes for patients. The concept of collaborative practice can include collaboration between healthcare workers of different professional backgrounds and collaboration with patients, families and communities. Most models of collaborative practice were developed in Western and high-income countries and are not easily translatable to settings which are culturally diverse and lower in resources. This project aimed to develop a set of recommendations to improve collaborative practice in Malaysia.
METHODS
METHODS
In the first phase, qualitative research was conducted to better understand collaboration in a psychiatric hospital (previously published). In the second phase a local hospital level committee from the same hospital was created to act on the qualitative research and create a set of recommendations to improve collaborative practice at the hospital for the hospital. Some of these recommendations were implemented, where feasible and the outcomes discussed. These recommendations were then sent to a nationwide Delphi panel. These committees consisted of healthcare staff of various professions, patients and carers.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The Delphi panel reached consensus after three rounds. The recommendations include ways to improve collaborative problem solving and decision making in the hospital, ways to improve the autonomy and relatedness of patients, carers and staff and ways to improve the levels of resources (e.g. skills training in staff, allowing people with lived experience of mental disorder to contribute).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This study showed that the Delphi method is a feasible method of developing recommendations and guidelines in Malaysia and allowed a wider range of stakeholders to contribute than traditional methods of developing guidelines and recommendations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32577126
doi: 10.1186/s13033-020-00374-7
pii: 374
pmc: PMC7304147
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
45Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interestsThe author declares that they have no competing interests.
Références
Eur Psychiatry. 2014 Aug;29(6):358-64
pubmed: 24439514
J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Apr;24(4):464-8
pubmed: 19156468
Am J Prev Med. 2001 Apr;20(3 Suppl):21-35
pubmed: 11306229
J Public Health (Oxf). 2004 Dec;26(4):355-8
pubmed: 15598853
CMAJ. 2017 Mar 6;189(9):E341-E364
pubmed: 27799615
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15;(2):CD003030
pubmed: 19370580
Palliat Med. 2017 Sep;31(8):684-706
pubmed: 28190381
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2006 Oct;11(4):218-24
pubmed: 17018195
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2006 Winter;29(3):219-22
pubmed: 16450934
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 Aug 19;373(1753):
pubmed: 29967308
BJPsych Open. 2019 Dec 12;6(1):e4
pubmed: 31829292
Fam Pract. 2006 Jun;23(3):308-16
pubmed: 16461452
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2016 Jun;17(6):516-21
pubmed: 27099972
World Psychiatry. 2015 Oct;14(3):270-7
pubmed: 26407772
Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Aug;80(2):164-72
pubmed: 19945813
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2018 Feb;64(1):49-55
pubmed: 29103338
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2010 Dec 21;4:33
pubmed: 21176157
Health Place. 2002 Sep;8(3):211-20
pubmed: 12135644
J Occup Health Psychol. 2018 Jan;23(1):18-30
pubmed: 27643608
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Jun;32(6):640-647
pubmed: 28160187
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Jul;7(4):325-40
pubmed: 26168470
Br J Psychiatry. 2009 Oct;195(4):354-63
pubmed: 19794206
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Mar 27;19(1):99
pubmed: 30917811
J Fam Pract. 2004 Dec;53(12):974-80
pubmed: 15581440
PLoS One. 2018 May 31;13(5):e0197102
pubmed: 29851974
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 15;9(4):e94670
pubmed: 24736389
Psychiatr Serv. 2014 Apr 1;65(4):429-41
pubmed: 24549400
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2015 Oct;49(10):887-97
pubmed: 26296368
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Mar 01;16:79
pubmed: 26931580
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10:CD007825
pubmed: 23076937
Asia Pac J Public Health. 2011 Sep;23(5):690-702
pubmed: 21878464
BMJ. 1995 Aug 5;311(7001):376-80
pubmed: 7640549
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Oct;27(10):1361-7
pubmed: 22618581
Med Decis Making. 2015 Jan;35(1):114-31
pubmed: 25351843
BMJ. 1999 Sep 18;319(7212):766-71
pubmed: 10488010
Br J Psychiatry. 2019 May;214(5):273-278
pubmed: 31012407
Psychiatr Serv. 2013 Sep 1;64(9):886-92
pubmed: 23771555
J Couns Psychol. 2016 Jan;63(1):32-41
pubmed: 26191979
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jun 16;15(6):
pubmed: 29914185
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Nov;63(3):319-27
pubmed: 16872793
Australas Psychiatry. 2011 Apr;19(2):163-7
pubmed: 21443394
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2018 Mar 27;20(4):23
pubmed: 29589129
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2018 Jun;32(3):488-494
pubmed: 29784235
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Nov 19;(11):CD009149
pubmed: 24249541
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 Aug 19;373(1753):
pubmed: 29967303
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 03;(3):CD010523
pubmed: 25733495
Cardiol Young. 2010 Oct;20(5):477-84
pubmed: 20456816
BMC Psychiatry. 2009 Aug 03;9:47
pubmed: 19646284
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;(3):CD004565
pubmed: 17636767
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2016 Aug 30;10(1):53
pubmed: 27579055
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Oct;93(1):102-7
pubmed: 23768763
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 May 17;7:71
pubmed: 17506904
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jan 27;(1):CD000313
pubmed: 26816297
Br J Gen Pract. 2000 Nov;50(460):892-9
pubmed: 11141876
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2003 Apr;37(2):169-83
pubmed: 12656956
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2013 Jun 04;7:489-97
pubmed: 23766635
Popul Health Manag. 2018 Dec;21(6):517
pubmed: 30156467
Am J Psychiatry. 2012 Aug;169(8):790-804
pubmed: 22772364
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2014 Aug;26(4):467-75
pubmed: 25137113
Aust J Prim Health. 2014;20(3):241-9
pubmed: 23647584
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2008 Feb 21;2(1):2
pubmed: 18291042
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2014 Dec;58(12):1172-8
pubmed: 24289283
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e36080
pubmed: 22558336
Br J Gen Pract. 2003 Mar;53(488):197-203
pubmed: 14694695
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12:CD003267
pubmed: 23235595