Organisational challenges, volumes of oncological activity and patients' perception during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 epidemic.
Betacoronavirus
/ pathogenicity
COVID-19
COVID-19 Testing
Clinical Laboratory Techniques
/ standards
Coronavirus Infections
/ diagnosis
Female
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Health Personnel
/ psychology
Humans
Infection Control
/ organization & administration
Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional
/ prevention & control
Infectious Disease Transmission, Professional-to-Patient
/ prevention & control
Italy
/ epidemiology
Male
Mass Screening
/ standards
Medical Oncology
/ methods
Neoplasms
/ psychology
Pandemics
/ prevention & control
Patient Admission
/ standards
Pneumonia, Viral
/ epidemiology
Psychosocial Support Systems
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
SARS-CoV-2
Oncological activity
Patients' perception
Risk containing measures
SARS-CoV-2
Journal
European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)
ISSN: 1879-0852
Titre abrégé: Eur J Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9005373
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2020
08 2020
Historique:
received:
22
05
2020
accepted:
28
05
2020
pubmed:
25
6
2020
medline:
29
7
2020
entrez:
25
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
On February 23rd, the 1st case of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection was diagnosed at the University Hospital Trust of Verona, Italy. On March 13th, the Oncology Section was converted into a 22-inpatient bed coronavirus disease (COVID) Unit, and we reshaped our organisation to face the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic, while maintaining oncological activities. We tracked down (i) volumes of oncological activities (January 1st - March 31st, 2020 versus the same period of 2019), (ii) patients' and caregivers' perception and (iii) SARS-CoV-2 infection rate in oncology health professionals and SARS-CoV-2 infection-related hospital admissions of "active"' oncological patients. As compared with the same trimester in 2019, the overall reduction in total numbers of inpatient admissions, chemotherapy administrations and specialist visits in January-March 2020 was 8%, 6% and 3%, respectively; based on the weekly average of daily accesses, reduction in some of the oncological activities became statistically significant from week 11. The overall acceptance of adopted measures, as measured by targeted questionnaires administered to a sample of 241 outpatients, was high (>70%). Overall, 8 of 85 oncology health professionals tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection (all but one employed in the COVID Unit, no hospital admissions and no treatment required); among 471 patients admitted for SARS-CoV-2 infection, 7 had an "active"' oncological disease (2 died of infection-related complications). A slight, but statistically significant reduction in oncology activity was registered during the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic peak in Verona, Italy. Organisational and protective measures adopted appear to have contributed to keep infections in both oncological patients and health professionals to a minimum.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
On February 23rd, the 1st case of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection was diagnosed at the University Hospital Trust of Verona, Italy. On March 13th, the Oncology Section was converted into a 22-inpatient bed coronavirus disease (COVID) Unit, and we reshaped our organisation to face the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic, while maintaining oncological activities.
METHODS
We tracked down (i) volumes of oncological activities (January 1st - March 31st, 2020 versus the same period of 2019), (ii) patients' and caregivers' perception and (iii) SARS-CoV-2 infection rate in oncology health professionals and SARS-CoV-2 infection-related hospital admissions of "active"' oncological patients.
RESULTS
As compared with the same trimester in 2019, the overall reduction in total numbers of inpatient admissions, chemotherapy administrations and specialist visits in January-March 2020 was 8%, 6% and 3%, respectively; based on the weekly average of daily accesses, reduction in some of the oncological activities became statistically significant from week 11. The overall acceptance of adopted measures, as measured by targeted questionnaires administered to a sample of 241 outpatients, was high (>70%). Overall, 8 of 85 oncology health professionals tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection (all but one employed in the COVID Unit, no hospital admissions and no treatment required); among 471 patients admitted for SARS-CoV-2 infection, 7 had an "active"' oncological disease (2 died of infection-related complications).
CONCLUSIONS
A slight, but statistically significant reduction in oncology activity was registered during the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic peak in Verona, Italy. Organisational and protective measures adopted appear to have contributed to keep infections in both oncological patients and health professionals to a minimum.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32580131
pii: S0959-8049(20)30325-7
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.05.029
pmc: PMC7287451
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
159-169Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interest statement M.M. reports receiving personal fees from Pfizer, EUSA Pharma and Astra Zeneca, outside the submitted manuscript. S.P. reports receiving honoraria or speakers' fee from Astra Zeneca, Eli-Lilly, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD and Roche, outside the submitted manuscript. All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Références
Cancer Discov. 2020 Jun;10(6):783-791
pubmed: 32345594
Eur Respir J. 2020 May 21;55(5):
pubmed: 32341111
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Apr;21(4):e181
pubmed: 32142621
Ann Oncol. 2020 Aug;31(8):1040-1045
pubmed: 32387456
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 14;382(20):e61
pubmed: 32343498
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2020 May;17(5):268-270
pubmed: 32242095
Nat Med. 2020 May;26(5):665-671
pubmed: 32405058
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Apr;21(4):467
pubmed: 32240603
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jun 11;382(24):2285-2287
pubmed: 32267650
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Jun;58(5):497-499
pubmed: 32340765
Assist Inferm Ric. 2013 Oct-Dec;32(4):233-8
pubmed: 24441468
Lancet. 2020 Apr 4;395(10230):1101-1102
pubmed: 32247384
JAMA. 2020 May 12;323(18):1771-1772
pubmed: 32219360
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jun 11;382(24):2368-2371
pubmed: 32302076
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 21;382(21):e71
pubmed: 32369276
Ann Oncol. 2020 Jul;31(7):894-901
pubmed: 32224151
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 14;382(20):1873-1875
pubmed: 32187459
Lancet Oncol. 2020 May;21(5):603
pubmed: 32359483
Lancet Oncol. 2020 May;21(5):634-636
pubmed: 32359487
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Mar;21(3):335-337
pubmed: 32066541
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jul 2;383(1):e1
pubmed: 32374955
Lancet Oncol. 2020 May;21(5):629-630
pubmed: 32247319
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Apr;21(4):e180
pubmed: 32142622
Ann Oncol. 2020 Jul;31(7):840-843
pubmed: 32243893
Ann Oncol. 2020 Aug;31(8):1088-1089
pubmed: 32330541
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Jun;21(6):748-750
pubmed: 32359404