Comparison of the Oxford Sleep Resistance Test and the Multiple Sleep Latency Test.
Journal
Physiological measurement
ISSN: 1361-6579
Titre abrégé: Physiol Meas
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9306921
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 11 2020
06 11 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
25
6
2020
medline:
30
7
2021
entrez:
25
6
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The Oxford Sleep Resistance Test (OSLER) consists of four tests over 40 min conducted in a dark and quiet room. If a dim light flashes the patient has to briefly depress a button and then press it again immediately, which indicates that the patient resists sleep. The Maintenance of Wakefulness test (MWT) is another test to assess the ability to maintain wakefulness. Previous studies found a good correlation between the sleep latencies measured with the Osler and the MWT. The most widely used Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT) measures the propensity to fall asleep and not the inability to stay awake. Up to this date there have been no studies comparing the Osler and the MSLT, which is the aim of the study presented here. After a night of polysomnography we investigated the sleep latencies the following day with the Osler and the MSLT in 43 patients suffering from moderate or severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) (33 men and 10 women; median age 59 years; median apnea hypopnea index 30.5 per hour sleep). We analysed the correlation between these two tests and between values in the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS) and these two tests. We did not find a correlation between the Osler and the MSLT nor between these two tests and the questionnaires (ESS, KSS). The only significant correlation was found between the mean MSLT latency and the sleep onset latency in the polysomnography the night before. Seven patients stayed awake during the Osler and showed a decreased mean sleep latency in the MSLT. The Osler, the MSLT and the questionnaires measure different objective and subjective aspects of sleepiness. In untreated OSA patients an increased propensity to fall asleep was not automatically associated with the inability to stay awake.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32580182
doi: 10.1088/1361-6579/ab9feb
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM