Brief evidence-based interventions for universal child health services: a restricted evidence assessment of the literature.
Child public health
Emotional and social wellbeing
Home learning improvement
Infant
Mental health
Rapid evidence assessment
Sleep
Journal
BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 Jun 2020
24 Jun 2020
Historique:
received:
27
01
2020
accepted:
12
06
2020
entrez:
26
6
2020
pubmed:
26
6
2020
medline:
18
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Universal child health services (UCHS) provide an important pragmatic platform for the delivery of universal and targeted interventions to support families and optimize child health outcomes. We aimed to identify brief, evidence-based interventions for common health and developmental problems that could be potentially implemented in UCHS. A restricted evidence assessment (REA) of electronic databases and grey literature was undertaken covering January 2006 to August 2019. Studies were eligible if (i) outcomes related to one or more of four areas: child social and emotional wellbeing (SEWB), infant sleep, home learning environment or parent mental health, (ii) a comparison group was used, (iii) universal or targeted intervention were delivered in non-tertiary settings, (iv) interventions did not last more than 4 sessions, and (v) children were aged between 2 weeks postpartum and 5 years at baseline. Seventeen studies met the eligibility criteria. Of these, three interventions could possibly be implemented at scale within UCHS platforms: (1) a universal child behavioural intervention which did not affect its primary outcome of infant sleep but improved parental mental health, (2) a universal screening programme which improved maternal mental health, and (3) a targeted child behavioural intervention which improved parent-reported infant sleep problems and parental mental health. Key lessons learnt include: (1) Interventions should impart the maximal amount of information within an initial session with future sessions reinforcing key messages, (2) Interventions should see the family as a holistic unit by considering the needs of parents with an emphasis on identification, triage and referral, and (3) Brief interventions may be more acceptable for stigmatized topics, but still entail considerable barriers that deter the most vulnerable. Delivery and evaluation of brief evidence-based interventions from a UCHS could lead to improved maternal and child health outcomes through a more responsive and equitable service. We recommend three interventions that meet our criteria of "best bet" interventions.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Universal child health services (UCHS) provide an important pragmatic platform for the delivery of universal and targeted interventions to support families and optimize child health outcomes. We aimed to identify brief, evidence-based interventions for common health and developmental problems that could be potentially implemented in UCHS.
METHODS
METHODS
A restricted evidence assessment (REA) of electronic databases and grey literature was undertaken covering January 2006 to August 2019. Studies were eligible if (i) outcomes related to one or more of four areas: child social and emotional wellbeing (SEWB), infant sleep, home learning environment or parent mental health, (ii) a comparison group was used, (iii) universal or targeted intervention were delivered in non-tertiary settings, (iv) interventions did not last more than 4 sessions, and (v) children were aged between 2 weeks postpartum and 5 years at baseline.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Seventeen studies met the eligibility criteria. Of these, three interventions could possibly be implemented at scale within UCHS platforms: (1) a universal child behavioural intervention which did not affect its primary outcome of infant sleep but improved parental mental health, (2) a universal screening programme which improved maternal mental health, and (3) a targeted child behavioural intervention which improved parent-reported infant sleep problems and parental mental health. Key lessons learnt include: (1) Interventions should impart the maximal amount of information within an initial session with future sessions reinforcing key messages, (2) Interventions should see the family as a holistic unit by considering the needs of parents with an emphasis on identification, triage and referral, and (3) Brief interventions may be more acceptable for stigmatized topics, but still entail considerable barriers that deter the most vulnerable.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Delivery and evaluation of brief evidence-based interventions from a UCHS could lead to improved maternal and child health outcomes through a more responsive and equitable service. We recommend three interventions that meet our criteria of "best bet" interventions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32580720
doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09104-7
pii: 10.1186/s12889-020-09104-7
pmc: PMC7315474
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
993Références
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2018 Jan;39(1):55-65
pubmed: 28902067
Pediatrics. 2007 May;119(5):947-55
pubmed: 17473096
Scand J Public Health. 2018 Dec;46(8):805-816
pubmed: 29726749
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 24;2:CD004148
pubmed: 29476653
Early Child Res Q. 2012;27(3):339-351
pubmed: 23049162
Am J Prev Med. 1998 May;14(4):245-58
pubmed: 9635069
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012 Nov;166(11):1045-52
pubmed: 22986757
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2014 Sep-Oct;43(5):598-613
pubmed: 25139257
Pediatrics. 2005 Apr;115(4 Suppl):1121-3
pubmed: 15828080
Child Dev. 2008 Sep-Oct;79(5):1395-414
pubmed: 18826532
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006 Feb;74(1):1-9
pubmed: 16551138
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2016 Feb;47(1):102-12
pubmed: 25863790
Medwave. 2018 Jan 29;18(1):e7148
pubmed: 29385118
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 8;11(12):e0165903
pubmed: 27930662
Arch Dis Child. 2014 Dec;99(12):1158-62
pubmed: 25053734
Pediatrics. 2016 Jun;137(6):
pubmed: 27221288
Matern Child Health J. 2019 Jan;23(1):39-46
pubmed: 30003519
Health Hum Rights. 2010 Dec 15;12(2):3-16
pubmed: 21178186
J Paediatr Child Health. 2013 Sep;49(9):E365-9
pubmed: 23551940
Lancet Psychiatry. 2017 Jul;4(7):529-539
pubmed: 28527657
Arch Dis Child. 2007 Nov;92(11):952-8
pubmed: 17158146
Brain Res. 2006 Sep 19;1110(1):166-74
pubmed: 16879809
J Formos Med Assoc. 2012 May;111(5):258-64
pubmed: 22656396
Am Psychol. 2005 Sep;60(6):601-14
pubmed: 16173893
BMJ. 2008 Feb 9;336(7639):318-21
pubmed: 18244958
J Clin Nurs. 2010 Nov;19(21-22):3051-62
pubmed: 20726926
Child Care Health Dev. 2014 Sep;40(5):640-53
pubmed: 24111506
Med J Aust. 2013 Aug 5;199(3 Suppl):S7-9
pubmed: 25369850
J Adv Nurs. 2010 Jun;66(6):1317-27
pubmed: 20384641
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007 Oct;161(10):967-71
pubmed: 17909140
Am Psychol. 2005 Sep;60(6):615-27
pubmed: 16173894
BMJ Open. 2016 Mar 07;6(3):e009396
pubmed: 26951210
Annu Rev Econom. 2014 Aug;6:689-733
pubmed: 25346785
Singapore Med J. 2017 Jan;58(1):50-54
pubmed: 26915392
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1994 Dec;62(6):1127-40
pubmed: 7860811
Pediatrics. 2014 Feb;133(2):e346-54
pubmed: 24394682
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2008 Nov;49(11):1211-9
pubmed: 18665880
J Pediatr Psychol. 2008 Jun;33(5):473-86
pubmed: 17938146
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2002 Aug;41(8):964-71
pubmed: 12162632
BMC Public Health. 2010 Jul 23;10:432
pubmed: 20653934
Clin Med Res. 2009 Sep;7(3):85-92
pubmed: 19251583