Hypofractionated breast radiotherapy for 1 week versus 3 weeks (FAST-Forward): 5-year efficacy and late normal tissue effects results from a multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised, phase 3 trial.


Journal

Lancet (London, England)
ISSN: 1474-547X
Titre abrégé: Lancet
Pays: England
ID NLM: 2985213R

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
23 05 2020
Historique:
received: 25 03 2020
revised: 08 04 2020
accepted: 09 04 2020
entrez: 26 6 2020
pubmed: 26 6 2020
medline: 3 7 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

We aimed to identify a five-fraction schedule of adjuvant radiotherapy (radiation therapy) delivered in 1 week that is non-inferior in terms of local cancer control and is as safe as an international standard 15-fraction regimen after primary surgery for early breast cancer. Here, we present 5-year results of the FAST-Forward trial. FAST-Forward is a multicentre, phase 3, randomised, non-inferiority trial done at 97 hospitals (47 radiotherapy centres and 50 referring hospitals) in the UK. Patients aged at least 18 years with invasive carcinoma of the breast (pT1-3, pN0-1, M0) after breast conservation surgery or mastectomy were eligible. We randomly allocated patients to either 40 Gy in 15 fractions (over 3 weeks), 27 Gy in five fractions (over 1 week), or 26 Gy in five fractions (over 1 week) to the whole breast or chest wall. Allocation was not masked because of the nature of the intervention. The primary endpoint was ipsilateral breast tumour relapse; assuming a 2% 5-year incidence for 40 Gy, non-inferiority was predefined as ≤1·6% excess for five-fraction schedules (critical hazard ratio [HR] of 1·81). Normal tissue effects were assessed by clinicians, patients, and from photographs. This trial is registered at isrctn.com, ISRCTN19906132. Between Nov 24, 2011, and June 19, 2014, we recruited and obtained consent from 4096 patients from 97 UK centres, of whom 1361 were assigned to the 40 Gy schedule, 1367 to the 27 Gy schedule, and 1368 to the 26 Gy schedule. At a median follow-up of 71·5 months (IQR 71·3 to 71·7), the primary endpoint event occurred in 79 patients (31 in the 40 Gy group, 27 in the 27 Gy group, and 21 in the 26 Gy group); HRs versus 40 Gy in 15 fractions were 0·86 (95% CI 0·51 to 1·44) for 27 Gy in five fractions and 0·67 (0·38 to 1·16) for 26 Gy in five fractions. 5-year incidence of ipsilateral breast tumour relapse after 40 Gy was 2·1% (1·4 to 3·1); estimated absolute differences versus 40 Gy in 15 fractions were -0·3% (-1·0 to 0·9) for 27 Gy in five fractions (probability of incorrectly accepting an inferior five-fraction schedule: p=0·0022 vs 40 Gy in 15 fractions) and -0·7% (-1·3 to 0·3) for 26 Gy in five fractions (p=0·00019 vs 40 Gy in 15 fractions). At 5 years, any moderate or marked clinician-assessed normal tissue effects in the breast or chest wall was reported for 98 of 986 (9·9%) 40 Gy patients, 155 (15·4%) of 1005 27 Gy patients, and 121 of 1020 (11·9%) 26 Gy patients. Across all clinician assessments from 1-5 years, odds ratios versus 40 Gy in 15 fractions were 1·55 (95% CI 1·32 to 1·83, p<0·0001) for 27 Gy in five fractions and 1·12 (0·94 to 1·34, p=0·20) for 26 Gy in five fractions. Patient and photographic assessments showed higher normal tissue effect risk for 27 Gy versus 40 Gy but not for 26 Gy versus 40 Gy. 26 Gy in five fractions over 1 week is non-inferior to the standard of 40 Gy in 15 fractions over 3 weeks for local tumour control, and is as safe in terms of normal tissue effects up to 5 years for patients prescribed adjuvant local radiotherapy after primary surgery for early-stage breast cancer. National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment Programme.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
We aimed to identify a five-fraction schedule of adjuvant radiotherapy (radiation therapy) delivered in 1 week that is non-inferior in terms of local cancer control and is as safe as an international standard 15-fraction regimen after primary surgery for early breast cancer. Here, we present 5-year results of the FAST-Forward trial.
METHODS
FAST-Forward is a multicentre, phase 3, randomised, non-inferiority trial done at 97 hospitals (47 radiotherapy centres and 50 referring hospitals) in the UK. Patients aged at least 18 years with invasive carcinoma of the breast (pT1-3, pN0-1, M0) after breast conservation surgery or mastectomy were eligible. We randomly allocated patients to either 40 Gy in 15 fractions (over 3 weeks), 27 Gy in five fractions (over 1 week), or 26 Gy in five fractions (over 1 week) to the whole breast or chest wall. Allocation was not masked because of the nature of the intervention. The primary endpoint was ipsilateral breast tumour relapse; assuming a 2% 5-year incidence for 40 Gy, non-inferiority was predefined as ≤1·6% excess for five-fraction schedules (critical hazard ratio [HR] of 1·81). Normal tissue effects were assessed by clinicians, patients, and from photographs. This trial is registered at isrctn.com, ISRCTN19906132.
FINDINGS
Between Nov 24, 2011, and June 19, 2014, we recruited and obtained consent from 4096 patients from 97 UK centres, of whom 1361 were assigned to the 40 Gy schedule, 1367 to the 27 Gy schedule, and 1368 to the 26 Gy schedule. At a median follow-up of 71·5 months (IQR 71·3 to 71·7), the primary endpoint event occurred in 79 patients (31 in the 40 Gy group, 27 in the 27 Gy group, and 21 in the 26 Gy group); HRs versus 40 Gy in 15 fractions were 0·86 (95% CI 0·51 to 1·44) for 27 Gy in five fractions and 0·67 (0·38 to 1·16) for 26 Gy in five fractions. 5-year incidence of ipsilateral breast tumour relapse after 40 Gy was 2·1% (1·4 to 3·1); estimated absolute differences versus 40 Gy in 15 fractions were -0·3% (-1·0 to 0·9) for 27 Gy in five fractions (probability of incorrectly accepting an inferior five-fraction schedule: p=0·0022 vs 40 Gy in 15 fractions) and -0·7% (-1·3 to 0·3) for 26 Gy in five fractions (p=0·00019 vs 40 Gy in 15 fractions). At 5 years, any moderate or marked clinician-assessed normal tissue effects in the breast or chest wall was reported for 98 of 986 (9·9%) 40 Gy patients, 155 (15·4%) of 1005 27 Gy patients, and 121 of 1020 (11·9%) 26 Gy patients. Across all clinician assessments from 1-5 years, odds ratios versus 40 Gy in 15 fractions were 1·55 (95% CI 1·32 to 1·83, p<0·0001) for 27 Gy in five fractions and 1·12 (0·94 to 1·34, p=0·20) for 26 Gy in five fractions. Patient and photographic assessments showed higher normal tissue effect risk for 27 Gy versus 40 Gy but not for 26 Gy versus 40 Gy.
INTERPRETATION
26 Gy in five fractions over 1 week is non-inferior to the standard of 40 Gy in 15 fractions over 3 weeks for local tumour control, and is as safe in terms of normal tissue effects up to 5 years for patients prescribed adjuvant local radiotherapy after primary surgery for early-stage breast cancer.
FUNDING
National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment Programme.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32580883
pii: S0140-6736(20)30932-6
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30932-6
pmc: PMC7262592
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Clinical Trial, Phase III Equivalence Trial Journal Article Multicenter Study Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1613-1626

Investigateurs

Abdulla Alhasso (A)
Anne Armstrong (A)
Judith Bliss (J)
David Bloomfield (D)
Jo Bowen (J)
Murray Brunt (M)
Charlie Chan (C)
Hannah Chantler (H)
Mark Churn (M)
Susan Cleator (S)
Charlotte Coles (C)
Ellen Donovan (E)
Andy Goodman (A)
Susan Griffin (S)
Jo Haviland (J)
Penny Hopwood (P)
Anna Kirby (A)
Julie Kirk (J)
Cliona Kirwan (C)
Marjory MacLennan (M)
Carolyn Morris (C)
Zohal Nabi (Z)
Elinor Sawyer (E)
Mark Sculphur (M)
Judith Sinclair (J)
Navita Somaiah (N)
Liba Stones (L)
Mark Sydenham (M)
Isabel Syndikus (I)
Jean Tremlett (J)
Karen Venables (K)
Duncan Wheatley (D)
John Yarnold (J)

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Références

BMJ. 1999 Dec 4;319(7223):1492-5
pubmed: 10582940
Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 May;27(5):1513-1530
pubmed: 27647808
Lancet. 2019 Dec 14;394(10215):2155-2164
pubmed: 31813636
Lancet. 2019 Dec 14;394(10215):2165-2172
pubmed: 31813635
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2008 Sep;20(7):497-501
pubmed: 18502105
Radiother Oncol. 2013 Aug;108(2):242-7
pubmed: 23726115
Radiother Oncol. 2011 Jul;100(1):93-100
pubmed: 21752481
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Mar;20(3):352-360
pubmed: 30711522
Lancet. 2017 Sep 9;390(10099):1048-1060
pubmed: 28779963
Radiother Oncol. 2016 Jul;120(1):114-8
pubmed: 27046390
Lancet. 2011 Nov 12;378(9804):1707-16
pubmed: 22019144
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2018 May - Jun;8(3):145-152
pubmed: 29545124
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Feb;18(2):259-268
pubmed: 28094198
Acta Oncol. 2006;45(3):280-4
pubmed: 16644570
Radiother Oncol. 2005 Apr;75(1):9-17
pubmed: 15878095
Lancet Oncol. 2006 Jun;7(6):467-71
pubmed: 16750496
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2017 Mar;29(3):e51-e56
pubmed: 27890346
Lancet. 2008 Mar 29;371(9618):1098-107
pubmed: 18355913
N Engl J Med. 2010 Feb 11;362(6):513-20
pubmed: 20147717
Lancet Oncol. 2008 Apr;9(4):331-41
pubmed: 18356109
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1992;23(5):915-23
pubmed: 1639653
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Oct;14(11):1086-1094
pubmed: 24055415
Am J Epidemiol. 2003 Feb 15;157(4):364-75
pubmed: 12578807
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002 Aug 7;94(15):1143-50
pubmed: 12165639
Lancet. 2014 Jun 21;383(9935):2127-35
pubmed: 24656685
N Engl J Med. 2013 Mar 14;368(11):987-98
pubmed: 23484825
Radiother Oncol. 2009 Jan;90(1):14-22
pubmed: 18502528

Auteurs

Adrian Murray Brunt (A)

University Hospitals of North Midlands and University of Keele, Stoke on Trent, UK; Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, London, UK. Electronic address: fastforward-icrctsu@icr.ac.uk.

Joanne S Haviland (JS)

Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, London, UK.

Duncan A Wheatley (DA)

Royal Cornwall Hospital, Treliske, Truro, UK.

Mark A Sydenham (MA)

Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, London, UK.

Abdulla Alhasso (A)

Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK.

David J Bloomfield (DJ)

Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals, Brighton, UK.

Charlie Chan (C)

Nuffield Health Cheltenham Hospital, Cheltenham, UK.

Mark Churn (M)

Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Worcester, UK.

Susan Cleator (S)

Imperial Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.

Charlotte E Coles (CE)

University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Andrew Goodman (A)

Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK; Torbay Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Torquay, UK.

Adrian Harnett (A)

Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK.

Penelope Hopwood (P)

Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, London, UK.

Anna M Kirby (AM)

The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.

Cliona C Kirwan (CC)

University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Carolyn Morris (C)

Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, London, UK.

Zohal Nabi (Z)

Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK.

Elinor Sawyer (E)

King's College London, London, UK.

Navita Somaiah (N)

The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.

Liba Stones (L)

Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, London, UK.

Isabel Syndikus (I)

Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Bebington, Wirral, UK.

Judith M Bliss (JM)

Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, London, UK.

John R Yarnold (JR)

The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH