Unconscious and Distinctive Control of Vocal Pitch and Timbre During Altered Auditory Feedback.

formant fundamental frequency (F0) vocal adjustment vocal compensation voice production

Journal

Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 05 12 2019
accepted: 11 05 2020
entrez: 26 6 2020
pubmed: 26 6 2020
medline: 26 6 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Vocal control plays a critical role in smooth social communication. Speakers constantly monitor auditory feedback (AF) and make adjustments when their voices deviate from their intentions. Previous studies have shown that when certain acoustic features of the AF are artificially altered, speakers compensate for this alteration in the opposite direction. However, little is known about how the vocal control system implements compensations for alterations of different acoustic features, and associates them with subjective consciousness. The present study investigated whether compensations for the fundamental frequency (F0), which corresponds to perceived pitch, and formants, which contribute to perceived timbre, can be performed unconsciously and independently. Forty native Japanese speakers received two types of altered AF during vowel production that involved shifts of either only the formant frequencies (formant modification; Fm) or both the pitch and formant frequencies (pitch + formant modification; PFm). For each type, three levels of shift (slight, medium, and severe) in both directions (increase or decrease) were used. After the experiment, participants were tested for whether they had perceived a change in the F0 and/or formants. The results showed that (i) only formants were compensated for in the Fm condition, while both the F0 and formants were compensated for in the PFm condition; (ii) the F0 compensation exhibited greater precision than the formant compensation in PFm; and (iii) compensation occurred even when participants misperceived or could not explicitly perceive the alteration in AF. These findings indicate that non-experts can compensate for both formant and F0 modifications in the AF during vocal production, even when the modifications are not explicitly or correctly perceived, which provides further evidence for a dissociation between conscious perception and action in vocal control. We propose that such unconscious control of voice production may enhance rapid adaptation to changing speech environments and facilitate mutual communication.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32581975
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01224
pmc: PMC7294928
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1224

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Xu, Tachibana, Okanoya, Hagiwara, Hashimoto and Homae.

Références

J Acoust Soc Am. 1994 Oct;96(4):2101-7
pubmed: 7963024
Curr Biol. 2012 Jan 24;22(2):113-7
pubmed: 22197241
J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Dec;122(6):3671-7
pubmed: 18247774
Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Mar;8(3):129-35
pubmed: 15301753
Exp Brain Res. 2000 Jan;130(2):133-41
pubmed: 10672466
Neuropsychologia. 2001;39(10):1047-54
pubmed: 11440757
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2002 Feb;13(1):17-26
pubmed: 11867247
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012 Jan 05;13(2):135-45
pubmed: 22218206
J Voice. 2008 Jul;22(4):399-407
pubmed: 17509827
Psychol Res. 2010 Jan;74(1):110-20
pubmed: 19034504
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2002 Apr;45(2):295-310
pubmed: 12003512
J Acoust Soc Am. 1974 Nov;56(5):1618-24
pubmed: 4427032
Curr Biol. 2011 Feb 22;21(4):R143-5
pubmed: 21334289
Science. 1998 Feb 20;279(5354):1213-6
pubmed: 9469813
J Acoust Soc Am. 2006 Apr;119(4):2363-71
pubmed: 16642849
J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Jan;127(1):EL1-5
pubmed: 20058940
Front Psychol. 2011 Jul 14;2:164
pubmed: 21811479
J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 May;135(5):3036-44
pubmed: 24815283
Psychol Bull. 2003 Sep;129(5):770-814
pubmed: 12956543
J Acoust Soc Am. 2000 Sep;108(3 Pt 1):1246-51
pubmed: 11008824
Curr Biol. 2008 May 6;18(9):R387-8
pubmed: 18460320
Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Jul;120(7):1303-12
pubmed: 19520602
Br J Psychol. 2011 Nov;102(4):711-25
pubmed: 21988380
J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Jan;125(1):384-90
pubmed: 19173425
Trends Cogn Sci. 2013 Jun;17(6):263-71
pubmed: 23664703
J Acoust Soc Am. 2001 Dec;110(6):2845-8
pubmed: 11785786
Curr Biol. 2005 Oct 11;15(19):1768-72
pubmed: 16213825
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jan 27;106(4):1245-8
pubmed: 19164569
J Commun Disord. 2006 Sep-Oct;39(5):350-65
pubmed: 16887139
Brain Lang. 2012 Dec;123(3):234-9
pubmed: 23117156
J Acoust Soc Am. 1991 Jun;89(6):2895-904
pubmed: 1918629
J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Feb;129(2):955-65
pubmed: 21361452
Curr Biol. 2008 Apr 22;18(8):R331-2
pubmed: 18430629
J Acoust Soc Am. 1990 Nov;88(5):2099-114
pubmed: 2269726
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Jan;48(2):607-18
pubmed: 19896958
J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Jul;126(1):414-24
pubmed: 19603898
J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Feb;121(2):1157-63
pubmed: 17348536
J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Feb;127(2):1059-68
pubmed: 20136227
Lang Speech. 1978 Jan-Mar;21(1):34-49
pubmed: 692241
J Acoust Soc Am. 2006 Aug;120(2):966-77
pubmed: 16938984
J Acoust Soc Am. 2000 Jan;107(1):559-64
pubmed: 10641664
J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Feb;121(2):1182-9
pubmed: 17348539
Exp Brain Res. 2008 Jun;187(4):613-21
pubmed: 18340440
Exp Brain Res. 1986;62(2):303-11
pubmed: 3709715
J Acoust Soc Am. 2006 Apr;119(4):2288-97
pubmed: 16642842
Neurosci Lett. 1985 Dec 18;62(3):371-6
pubmed: 4094724
Emotion. 2001 Dec;1(4):381-412
pubmed: 12901399
J Acoust Soc Am. 1992 May;91(5):2961-78
pubmed: 1629489
J Acoust Soc Am. 1998 Jun;103(6):3153-61
pubmed: 9637026
Curr Biol. 2008 Jun 3;18(11):R457-60
pubmed: 18522811
Front Psychol. 2013 Jul 15;4:439
pubmed: 23874321
Singapore Med J. 2005 Feb;46(2):54-61; quiz 62
pubmed: 15678285
J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Nov;130(5):2978-86
pubmed: 22087926
J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Jan;123(1):273-8
pubmed: 18177157
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2003 Dec;30(4):333-9
pubmed: 14656557
J Voice. 2005 Sep;19(3):431-9
pubmed: 16102669
Neuroimage. 2008 Feb 1;39(3):1429-43
pubmed: 18035557
Percept Psychophys. 1980 Jan;27(1):24-7
pubmed: 7367197
Psychopathology. 2003 Nov-Dec;36(6):299-303
pubmed: 14646453
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Jun;114:158-167
pubmed: 29221832
Clin Neurophysiol. 2011 May;122(5):951-7
pubmed: 20869305
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49370
pubmed: 23145166
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 13;8(12):e82925
pubmed: 24349399
J Voice. 1997 Jun;11(2):202-11
pubmed: 9181544
J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Oct;122(4):2306-19
pubmed: 17902866
Clin Cancer Res. 2011 Oct 15;17(20):6553-62
pubmed: 21868765
Front Psychol. 2013 Oct 11;4:735
pubmed: 24133475
Neuroscience. 2013 Jun 14;240:176-85
pubmed: 23466810
J Acoust Soc Am. 2006 Apr;119(4):2382-93
pubmed: 16642851
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 Mar;70(3):614-36
pubmed: 8851745

Auteurs

Mingdi Xu (M)

Department of Language Sciences, Graduate School of Humanities, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo, Japan.

Ryosuke O Tachibana (RO)

Department of Life Sciences, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Kazuo Okanoya (K)

Department of Life Sciences, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Hiroko Hagiwara (H)

Department of Language Sciences, Graduate School of Humanities, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo, Japan.
Research Center for Language, Brain and Genetics, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo, Japan.

Ryu-Ichiro Hashimoto (RI)

Department of Language Sciences, Graduate School of Humanities, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo, Japan.
Research Center for Language, Brain and Genetics, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo, Japan.

Fumitaka Homae (F)

Department of Language Sciences, Graduate School of Humanities, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo, Japan.
Research Center for Language, Brain and Genetics, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo, Japan.

Classifications MeSH