Factors Affecting Usage Levels and Trends of Innovative Oncology Drugs Upon and After Reimbursement Under Taiwan National Health Insurance: Interrupted Time Series Analysis.
Antineoplastic Agents
/ economics
Drug Costs
Drug Prescriptions
/ statistics & numerical data
Drug Utilization
/ economics
Humans
Insurance, Health, Reimbursement
/ economics
Interrupted Time Series Analysis
Longitudinal Studies
National Health Programs
/ economics
Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Retrospective Studies
Taiwan
Journal
Clinical and translational science
ISSN: 1752-8062
Titre abrégé: Clin Transl Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101474067
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2020
11 2020
Historique:
received:
10
03
2020
accepted:
03
05
2020
pubmed:
26
6
2020
medline:
16
10
2021
entrez:
26
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Healthcare expenditure on pharmaceuticals, especially innovative oncology drugs, is escalating. Current knowledge on this topic is largely limited to studies conducted upon reimbursement of new drugs. We investigated how endogenous factors (e.g., changed reimbursement criteria, such as an expanded indication) and exogenous factors (e.g., competing drugs) affect the level and trends of innovative oncology drug utilization in the Taiwan National Health Insurance (NHI) system, both upon reimbursement and afterward. This retrospective longitudinal study analyzed monthly data (January 2009 to December 2014) from the NHI Research Database on the consumption (prescribing volume) of 15 innovative oncology drugs reimbursed by the NHI between 2007 and 2013. Effects of endogenous and exogenous factors on drug utilization were evaluated using interrupted time series analyses. In segmented regression analyses, changed drug prescribing volume after the indication expanded (endogenous factor) was statistically significant; however, drug volume did not change significantly after prescription restrictions changed. First-competitors and non-first-competitors (exogenous factors) were significantly associated with drug prescription levels or utilization rates. Taking sorafenib as an example, the post-reimbursement drug prescribing volume did not change significantly after its therapy line changed (endogenous factor), whereas the reimbursement of first-competitors (exogenous factor) was significantly associated with a lower level or usage rate of sorafenib. Utilization of innovative oncology drugs in Taiwan changed dramatically after NHI reimbursement, driven largely by expanded indications and new competitors. Drug utilization evaluations should investigate both endogenous and exogenous factors.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32583962
doi: 10.1111/cts.12829
pmc: PMC7719368
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antineoplastic Agents
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1288-1297Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. Clinical and Translational Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.
Références
Mayo Clin Proc. 2012 Oct;87(10):935-43
pubmed: 23036669
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Aug;68(8):950-6
pubmed: 25890805
J Oncol Pract. 2017 Nov;13(11):758-762
pubmed: 28872996
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Sep 1;176(9):1317-23
pubmed: 27367749
J Formos Med Assoc. 2016 Dec;115(12):1076-1088
pubmed: 26786251
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010 Aug;19(8):1893-907
pubmed: 20647400
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2017 Dec;15(6):697-706
pubmed: 28871512
Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Sep;13(5):916-922
pubmed: 32166908
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010 Jun;9(6):427-8
pubmed: 20514063
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Aug 1;35(22):2482-2489
pubmed: 28471711
Am Health Drug Benefits. 2014 May;7(3):123-4
pubmed: 24991396
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jan 10;35(2):166-174
pubmed: 27870563
Value Health. 2017 Jan;20(1):118-125
pubmed: 28212952
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012 Mar;21(3):281-4
pubmed: 22234915
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2017 Aug;17(4):401-409
pubmed: 28010146
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Feb 1;46(1):348-355
pubmed: 27283160
Am Health Drug Benefits. 2016 Jun;9(4):233-8
pubmed: 27688835
Value Health Reg Issues. 2018 May;15:127-132
pubmed: 29704659
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2002 Aug;27(4):299-309
pubmed: 12174032
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Aug 10;27(23):3868-74
pubmed: 19581533
ESMO Open. 2017 Jan 31;1(6):e000125
pubmed: 28848662
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Apr;31(4):700-8
pubmed: 22492886
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2015 Sep;14(9):594-5
pubmed: 26272192
BMJ Open. 2015 Jul 15;5(7):e006940
pubmed: 26179644
Health Policy. 2016 Oct;120(10):1209-1215
pubmed: 27519975
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2017 Nov;44(6):943-954
pubmed: 28660370
CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Mar;65(2):87-108
pubmed: 25651787
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2015 Apr;13(2):e93-100
pubmed: 25450038
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Mar;83(3):642-652
pubmed: 27730670
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2017 Aug;17(4):411-419
pubmed: 28019130
Health Policy. 2016 Aug;120(8):867-74
pubmed: 27346072
Health Policy. 2015 Sep;119(9):1255-64
pubmed: 25929214
Pharmacoeconomics. 2014 Nov;32(11):1105-14
pubmed: 25118989
Gut Liver. 2016 May 23;10(3):332-9
pubmed: 27114433
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2017 May - Jun;57(3):341-348
pubmed: 28400255