Association of Intravitreal Aflibercept With Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Vessel Density in Patients With Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.
Adult
Angiogenesis Inhibitors
/ therapeutic use
Diabetic Retinopathy
/ diagnosis
Female
Fluorescein Angiography
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Intravitreal Injections
Male
Middle Aged
Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor
/ therapeutic use
Recombinant Fusion Proteins
/ therapeutic use
Retinal Neovascularization
/ diagnosis
Retinal Vessels
/ diagnostic imaging
Slit Lamp Microscopy
Tomography, Optical Coherence
Treatment Outcome
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Visual Acuity
/ physiology
Journal
JAMA ophthalmology
ISSN: 2168-6173
Titre abrégé: JAMA Ophthalmol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101589539
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 08 2020
01 08 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
26
6
2020
medline:
23
1
2021
entrez:
26
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Although previous studies have evaluated the association between anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy and macular vessel density, they were confounded by the presence of macular edema, which may be associated with artifacts and segmentation errors in optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). To evaluate the association of intravitreal aflibercept with changes in macular vascular density using OCTA in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy without diabetic macular edema. This post hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial used data on 40 eyes of 40 patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy without diabetic macular edema who were enrolled in the Intravitreal Aflibercept for Retinal Nonperfusion in Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (RECOVERY) clinical trial from August 1, 2016, to June 31, 2017. Three patients were lost to follow-up at month 12, and 5 patients were excluded from analysis because of poor OCTA image quality, leaving 16 patients in each cohort in the final analysis. Data analysis was performed from March 1, 2018, to January 15, 2019. In the RECOVERY trial, patients were randomized into cohorts receiving 2 mg of aflibercept injections monthly (n = 20) or quarterly (n = 20) and treated for 12 months. The percentage of vascular density (in total scan and foveal and parafoveal regions) was compared before and after 12 months of therapy. The sample for this OCTA analysis included 32 eyes from 32 patients (mean [SD] age, 48.37 [12.30] years; 17 [53.1%] male). The mean (SD) total scan vascular density for the superficial vascular complex was 42.28% (4.03%; 95% CI, 40.63%-43.93%) at baseline and 39.64% (4.01%; 95% CI, 37.91%-41.37%) at month 12 (P = .69). For the deep vascular complex, the mean (SD) vascular density was 48.42% (4.99%; 95% CI, 46.36%-50.47%) at baseline and 45.69% (4.63%; 95% CI, 43.69%-47.70%) at month 12 (P = .40). For the choriocapillaris, the mean (SD) vascular density was 64.42% (3.36%; 95% CI, 63.04%-65.81%) at baseline and 62.55% (4.79%; 95% CI, 60.48%-64.62%) at month 12 (P = .16). There was no difference in vascular density parameters between monthly and quarterly injection arms at month 12. In this study, macular vascular density did not change after 12 months of intravitreal aflibercept therapy. Because nonperfusion is expected to progress in diabetic retinopathy, this finding may represent a beneficial association between anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy and macular vascular density. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02863354.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32584384
pii: 2767414
doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.2130
pmc: PMC7317653
doi:
Substances chimiques
Angiogenesis Inhibitors
0
Recombinant Fusion Proteins
0
VEGFA protein, human
0
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
0
aflibercept
15C2VL427D
Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor
EC 2.7.10.1
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02863354']
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
851-857Références
Arch Ophthalmol. 1985 Dec;103(12):1796-806
pubmed: 2866759
Int J Retina Vitreous. 2015 Apr 15;1:5
pubmed: 27847598
Br J Ophthalmol. 2012 Feb;96(2):179-84
pubmed: 22250209
Ophthalmology. 2012 Apr;119(4):789-801
pubmed: 22330964
JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4
pubmed: 24141714
Int Ophthalmol. 2019 Oct;39(10):2361-2371
pubmed: 31119505
Ophthalmology. 1996 Nov;103(11):1820-8
pubmed: 8942877
Ophthalmology. 2014 Sep;121(9):1783-9
pubmed: 24768239
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Nov;96(45):e8379
pubmed: 29137019
Am J Pathol. 1991 Jul;139(1):81-100
pubmed: 1713023
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Jan;133(1):45-50
pubmed: 25317632
Am J Ophthalmol. 2016 Oct;170:58-67
pubmed: 27496785
Clin Ophthalmol. 2013;7:173-8
pubmed: 23355773
Am J Pathol. 1995 Sep;147(3):642-53
pubmed: 7545873
Int J Retina Vitreous. 2016 May 1;2:11
pubmed: 27847629
Ophthalmology. 2016 May;123(5):1053-9
pubmed: 26896126
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017 Jan 1;58(1):30-34
pubmed: 28114569
Ophthalmology. 2016 Nov;123(11):2376-2385
pubmed: 27651226
JAMA. 2015 Nov 24;314(20):2137-2146
pubmed: 26565927
Am J Ophthalmol. 2015 Jul;160(1):35-44.e1
pubmed: 25896459
Arch Ophthalmol. 2009 Feb;127(2):132-40
pubmed: 19204228
N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 29;366(13):1227-39
pubmed: 22455417
Clin Ophthalmol. 2017 Jan 21;11:193-200
pubmed: 28176934
Ophthalmology. 2018 Oct;125(10):1568-1574
pubmed: 29752001
Ophthalmology. 2013 Apr;120(4):795-802
pubmed: 23260261
Am J Ophthalmol. 2013 Oct;156(4):693-705
pubmed: 24053892
N Engl J Med. 2005 Aug 25;353(8):839-41
pubmed: 16120866
Ophthalmology. 1981 Jul;88(7):583-600
pubmed: 7196564
Retina. 2011 Jun;31(6):1068-74
pubmed: 21451440
Adv Ther. 2012 Apr;29(4):359-69
pubmed: 22402896