Indications for Rituximab Use in an Integrated Health Care Delivery System.
Adult
Aged
Antigens, CD20
/ metabolism
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
/ administration & dosage
Arthritis, Rheumatoid
/ drug therapy
Autoimmune Diseases
/ drug therapy
Cross-Sectional Studies
Delivery of Health Care
/ methods
Delivery of Health Care, Integrated
/ methods
Female
Humans
Infusions, Intravenous
Male
Middle Aged
Off-Label Use
Retrospective Studies
Rituximab
/ administration & dosage
Journal
Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy
ISSN: 2376-1032
Titre abrégé: J Manag Care Spec Pharm
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101644425
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2020
Jul 2020
Historique:
entrez:
26
6
2020
pubmed:
26
6
2020
medline:
2
4
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Rituximab is a top-selling biologic that was first approved by the FDA in 1997 for a non-Hodgkin lymphoma orphan indication. It has since been approved for additional orphan indications, with rheumatoid arthritis as the only FDA-approved, nonorphan indication. Evidence suggests that rituximab is frequently used off-label, but information on its use over time and indications for use in the United States is limited. To assess incident rituximab use over time in an integrated health care delivery system. This was a cross-sectional, retrospective study. Data were collected from administrative databases and manual chart reviews. Patients who received their first rituximab infusion between October 1, 2009, and December 31, 2017, and who were not a part of a clinical trial were included. Indication for use (FDA-approved orphan/nonorphan, off-label) was determined. Proportions of use were assessed over time. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was performed to assess factors associated with receiving rituximab for an FDA-approved indication. A total of 1,674 patients were included. The majority (66.4%) of patients had an FDA-approved indication, with lymphoma being the most common approved indication (66.4%). The most common indication for off-label use was neurologic conditions (72.7%), predominantly demyelinating diseases. Off-label indication use increased from 1.2% in 2009 to 55.6% in 2017. Factors associated with rituximab use for an FDA-approved indication included increased age (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.04-1.07) and increased burden of chronic disease (chronic disease score: AOR = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.02-1.12; Charlson Comorbidity Index score: AOR = 3.52, 95% CI = 3.03-4.10). Off-label use of rituximab grew dramatically over the course of the study. With the recent FDA approval of the rituximab biosimilar and its expected lower price, off-label use will likely continue to rise. Opportunities for cost savings and to ensure appropriate use of these medications should be evaluated. This study was funded by Kaiser Permanente. All authors except Hansen are employed by Kaiser Permanente. Hansen has nothing to disclose. Preliminary results were presented at the Mountain States Conference for Residents and Preceptors in May 2019 in Salt Lake City, UT, and at an encore presentation October 2019 at the American College of Clinical Pharmacy Annual Meeting in New York, NY.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Rituximab is a top-selling biologic that was first approved by the FDA in 1997 for a non-Hodgkin lymphoma orphan indication. It has since been approved for additional orphan indications, with rheumatoid arthritis as the only FDA-approved, nonorphan indication. Evidence suggests that rituximab is frequently used off-label, but information on its use over time and indications for use in the United States is limited.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
To assess incident rituximab use over time in an integrated health care delivery system.
METHODS
METHODS
This was a cross-sectional, retrospective study. Data were collected from administrative databases and manual chart reviews. Patients who received their first rituximab infusion between October 1, 2009, and December 31, 2017, and who were not a part of a clinical trial were included. Indication for use (FDA-approved orphan/nonorphan, off-label) was determined. Proportions of use were assessed over time. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was performed to assess factors associated with receiving rituximab for an FDA-approved indication.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 1,674 patients were included. The majority (66.4%) of patients had an FDA-approved indication, with lymphoma being the most common approved indication (66.4%). The most common indication for off-label use was neurologic conditions (72.7%), predominantly demyelinating diseases. Off-label indication use increased from 1.2% in 2009 to 55.6% in 2017. Factors associated with rituximab use for an FDA-approved indication included increased age (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.04-1.07) and increased burden of chronic disease (chronic disease score: AOR = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.02-1.12; Charlson Comorbidity Index score: AOR = 3.52, 95% CI = 3.03-4.10).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Off-label use of rituximab grew dramatically over the course of the study. With the recent FDA approval of the rituximab biosimilar and its expected lower price, off-label use will likely continue to rise. Opportunities for cost savings and to ensure appropriate use of these medications should be evaluated.
DISCLOSURES
BACKGROUND
This study was funded by Kaiser Permanente. All authors except Hansen are employed by Kaiser Permanente. Hansen has nothing to disclose. Preliminary results were presented at the Mountain States Conference for Residents and Preceptors in May 2019 in Salt Lake City, UT, and at an encore presentation October 2019 at the American College of Clinical Pharmacy Annual Meeting in New York, NY.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32584674
doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.7.832
pmc: PMC10391100
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antigens, CD20
0
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
0
Rituximab
4F4X42SYQ6
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Pragmatic Clinical Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
832-838Références
Ann Neurol. 2008 Mar;63(3):395-400
pubmed: 18383069
N Engl J Med. 2008 Feb 14;358(7):676-88
pubmed: 18272891
Intern Med J. 2013 Aug;43(8):863-70
pubmed: 23735074
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Nov;70(11):1385-93
pubmed: 25196202
Med Care. 2005 Nov;43(11):1130-9
pubmed: 16224307
J Oncol Pract. 2011 Mar;7(2):76-9
pubmed: 21731512
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2008 Dec 16;3:33
pubmed: 19087348
PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31894
pubmed: 22363762
Ann Neurol. 2009 Oct;66(4):460-71
pubmed: 19847908
Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2019 Oct;19(10):1045-1056
pubmed: 31512535
Acta Neurol Scand. 2018 Oct;138(4):327-331
pubmed: 29797711
N Engl J Med. 2006 Feb 2;354(5):445-7
pubmed: 16452556
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2016 Oct 28;11(1):144
pubmed: 27793155
Am J Manag Care. 2003 May;9(5):393-400; quiz 401-2
pubmed: 12744301
Neurology. 2010 Jun 8;74(23):1860-7
pubmed: 20530322
Med Care. 1995 Aug;33(8):783-95
pubmed: 7637401
Anticancer Res. 2019 Jul;39(7):3971-3973
pubmed: 31262930