The impact of maternal RSV vaccine to protect infants in Gavi-supported countries: Estimates from two models.
Child health
Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance
Health impact
Maternal RSV vaccine
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)
Journal
Vaccine
ISSN: 1873-2518
Titre abrégé: Vaccine
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8406899
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 07 2020
14 07 2020
Historique:
received:
14
02
2020
revised:
01
06
2020
accepted:
12
06
2020
pubmed:
27
6
2020
medline:
28
4
2021
entrez:
27
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Interventions to protect young infants against respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) are in advanced phases of development and are expected to be available in the foreseeable future. Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, included maternal vaccines and infant monoclonal antibodies for RSV as part of the 2018 vaccine investment strategy (VIS) and decided to support these products subject to licensure, World Health Organization prequalification, Strategic Advisory Group of Experts recommendation, and meeting the financial assumptions used as the basis of the investment case. Impact estimates reported in this manuscript were used to inform the Gavi VIS. We compared two independent vaccine impact models to evaluate a potential maternal RSV vaccine's impact on infant health in 73 Gavi-supported countries. Key inputs were harmonized across both models. We analyzed various scenarios to evaluate the effect of uncertain model parameters such as vaccine efficacy, duration of infant protection, and infant disease burden. Estimates of averted cases, severe cases, hospitalizations, deaths, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) were calculated over the 2023-2035 horizon. A maternal RSV vaccine with 60% efficacy offering 5 months of infant protection implemented across 73 low- and middle-income countries could avert 10.1-12.5 million cases, 2.8-4.0 million hospitalizations, 123.7-177.7 thousand deaths, and 8.5-11.9 million DALYs among infants under 6 months of age for the duration of analysis (2023-2035). Maternal RSV vaccination was projected to avert up to 42% of estimated RSV deaths among infants under 6 months in year 2035. Alternative scenario analyses with higher disease burden assumptions showed that a maternal vaccine could avert as many as 325-355 thousand deaths among infants under 6 months. RSV maternal immunization is projected to substantially reduce mortality and morbidity among young infants if introduced across Gavi-supported countries. This work was supported by Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA, and Respiratory Syncytial Virus Consortium in Europe. The findings and conclusions contained within are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect positions or policies of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation or of the Respiratory Syncytial Virus Consortium. LW is supported by Research Foundation-Flanders (1234620 N).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Interventions to protect young infants against respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) are in advanced phases of development and are expected to be available in the foreseeable future. Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, included maternal vaccines and infant monoclonal antibodies for RSV as part of the 2018 vaccine investment strategy (VIS) and decided to support these products subject to licensure, World Health Organization prequalification, Strategic Advisory Group of Experts recommendation, and meeting the financial assumptions used as the basis of the investment case. Impact estimates reported in this manuscript were used to inform the Gavi VIS.
METHODS
We compared two independent vaccine impact models to evaluate a potential maternal RSV vaccine's impact on infant health in 73 Gavi-supported countries. Key inputs were harmonized across both models. We analyzed various scenarios to evaluate the effect of uncertain model parameters such as vaccine efficacy, duration of infant protection, and infant disease burden. Estimates of averted cases, severe cases, hospitalizations, deaths, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) were calculated over the 2023-2035 horizon.
FINDINGS
A maternal RSV vaccine with 60% efficacy offering 5 months of infant protection implemented across 73 low- and middle-income countries could avert 10.1-12.5 million cases, 2.8-4.0 million hospitalizations, 123.7-177.7 thousand deaths, and 8.5-11.9 million DALYs among infants under 6 months of age for the duration of analysis (2023-2035). Maternal RSV vaccination was projected to avert up to 42% of estimated RSV deaths among infants under 6 months in year 2035. Alternative scenario analyses with higher disease burden assumptions showed that a maternal vaccine could avert as many as 325-355 thousand deaths among infants under 6 months.
INTERPRETATION
RSV maternal immunization is projected to substantially reduce mortality and morbidity among young infants if introduced across Gavi-supported countries.
FUNDING
This work was supported by Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA, and Respiratory Syncytial Virus Consortium in Europe. The findings and conclusions contained within are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect positions or policies of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation or of the Respiratory Syncytial Virus Consortium. LW is supported by Research Foundation-Flanders (1234620 N).
Identifiants
pubmed: 32586761
pii: S0264-410X(20)30822-7
doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.06.036
pmc: PMC7342012
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccines
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
5139-5147Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. AV is a former Senior Programme Officer at GAVI.
Références
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Jan;7(1):e58-e67
pubmed: 30554762
BMC Med. 2011 May 12;9:55
pubmed: 21569407
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009 Nov;124(5):1121; author reply 1121-2
pubmed: 19896000
Elife. 2020 Mar 27;9:
pubmed: 32216871
Lancet. 2012 Jun 9;379(9832):2162-72
pubmed: 22682464
J Perinatol. 2020 Jun;40(6):844-857
pubmed: 32341454
Lancet. 2019 Aug 31;394(10200):757-779
pubmed: 31257127
Lancet. 2015 Jan 31;385(9966):430-40
pubmed: 25280870
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Dec;7(12):e1664-e1674
pubmed: 31708147
Lancet. 2017 Sep 2;390(10098):946-958
pubmed: 28689664
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Sep 14;67(7):1063-1071
pubmed: 30010773
Infect Dis Ther. 2019 Dec;8(4):499-541
pubmed: 31535327
BMC Med. 2015 Mar 10;13:49
pubmed: 25857701
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Jun 24;71(1):211-214
pubmed: 31630167
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Jul 1;196(1):29-38
pubmed: 28152315
Lancet. 2016 Feb 6;387(10018):587-603
pubmed: 26794078
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2011 Sep;9(9):731-45
pubmed: 21905783
Vaccine. 2019 Aug 23;37(36):5481-5484
pubmed: 30948222
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 28;15(1):e0228022
pubmed: 31990945
Epidemiol Infect. 2015 Mar;143(4):804-12
pubmed: 24901443
J Infect Dis. 2019 Jan 9;219(3):358-364
pubmed: 30165655
Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Jul;17(7):e197-e208
pubmed: 28433705
Vaccine. 2010 Mar 8;28(11):2356-9
pubmed: 19567247
Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Nov;17(11):1133-1161
pubmed: 28843578
BMC Med. 2019 Aug 19;17(1):163
pubmed: 31422772