How and When to End the COVID-19 Lockdown: An Optimization Approach.
COVID-19
SARS-CoV-2
epidemiology
mathematical model
optimization
quarantine
Journal
Frontiers in public health
ISSN: 2296-2565
Titre abrégé: Front Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101616579
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
03
05
2020
accepted:
22
05
2020
entrez:
27
6
2020
pubmed:
27
6
2020
medline:
27
6
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Countries around the world are in a state of lockdown to help limit the spread of SARS-CoV-2. However, as the number of new daily confirmed cases begins to decrease, governments must decide how to release their populations from quarantine as efficiently as possible without overwhelming their health services. We applied an optimal control framework to an adapted Susceptible-Exposure-Infection-Recovery (SEIR) model framework to investigate the efficacy of two potential lockdown release strategies, focusing on the UK population as a test case. To limit recurrent spread, we find that ending quarantine for the entire population simultaneously is a high-risk strategy, and that a gradual re-integration approach would be more reliable. Furthermore, to increase the number of people that can be first released, lockdown should not be ended until the number of new daily confirmed cases reaches a sufficiently low threshold. We model a gradual release strategy by allowing different fractions of those in lockdown to re-enter the working non-quarantined population. Mathematical optimization methods, combined with our adapted SEIR model, determine how to maximize those working while preventing the health service from being overwhelmed. The optimal strategy is broadly found to be to release approximately half the population 2-4 weeks from the end of an initial infection peak, then wait another 3-4 months to allow for a second peak before releasing everyone else. We also modeled an "on-off" strategy, of releasing everyone, but re-establishing lockdown if infections become too high. We conclude that the worst-case scenario of a gradual release is more manageable than the worst-case scenario of an on-off strategy, and caution against lockdown-release strategies based on a threshold-dependent on-off mechanism. The two quantities most critical in determining the optimal solution are transmission rate and the recovery rate, where the latter is defined as the fraction of infected people in any given day that then become classed as recovered. We suggest that the accurate identification of these values is of particular importance to the ongoing monitoring of the pandemic.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32587844
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00262
pmc: PMC7298102
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Pagination
262Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_PC_19012
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/R015600/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Rawson, Brewer, Veltcheva, Huntingford and Bonsall.
Références
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 7;382(19):1787-1799
pubmed: 32187464
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Jun;20(6):669-677
pubmed: 32240634
Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):507-513
pubmed: 32007143
Lancet Public Health. 2020 May;5(5):e261-e270
pubmed: 32220655
Euro Surveill. 2020 Feb;25(5):
pubmed: 32046819
BMC Med. 2020 May 7;18(1):124
pubmed: 32375776
Lancet Public Health. 2020 May;5(5):e279-e288
pubmed: 32311320
Ann Intern Med. 2020 May 5;172(9):577-582
pubmed: 32150748
Science. 2020 May 22;368(6493):860-868
pubmed: 32291278
J Clin Med. 2020 Feb 17;9(2):
pubmed: 32079150
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 May;20(5):553-558
pubmed: 32171059
Nat Med. 2020 Jun;26(6):855-860
pubmed: 32322102
Nat Med. 2020 May;26(5):643-644
pubmed: 32405055
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Mar 12;:
pubmed: 32171390
Euro Surveill. 2020 Mar;25(10):
pubmed: 32183930