Segmenting communities as public health strategy: a view from the social sciences and humanities.

COVID-19 disability equity ethics ethnicity inclusion public health response social justice

Journal

Wellcome open research
ISSN: 2398-502X
Titre abrégé: Wellcome Open Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101696457

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
accepted: 18 05 2020
entrez: 27 6 2020
pubmed: 27 6 2020
medline: 27 6 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

On the 5th of May 2020, a group of modellers, epidemiologists and biomedical scientists from the University of Edinburgh proposed a "segmenting and shielding" approach to easing the lockdown in the UK over the coming months. Their proposal, which has been submitted to the government and since been discussed in the media, offers what appears to be a pragmatic solution out of the current lockdown. The approach identifies segments of the population as at-risk groups and outlines ways in which these remain shielded, while 'healthy' segments would be allowed to return to some kind of normality, gradually, over several weeks. This proposal highlights how narrowly conceived scientific responses may result in unintended consequences and repeat harmful public health practices. As an interdisciplinary group of researchers from the humanities and social sciences at the University of Edinburgh, we respond to this proposal and highlight how ethics, history, medical sociology and anthropology - as well as disability studies and decolonial approaches - offer critical engagement with such responses, and call for more creative and inclusive responses to public health crises.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32587904
doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15975.1
pmc: PMC7309410
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

104

Subventions

Organisme : Chief Scientist Office
ID : PDF/13/11
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2020 Ganguli-Mitra A et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

No competing interests were disclosed.

Auteurs

Agomoni Ganguli-Mitra (A)

Centre for Biomedicine, Self & Society, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Ingrid Young (I)

Centre for Biomedicine, Self & Society, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Lukas Engelmann (L)

Centre for Biomedicine, Self & Society, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Ian Harper (I)

School of Social and Political Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Donna McCormack (D)

Centre for Biomedicine, Self & Society, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
School of Literature and Languages, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.

Rebecca Marsland (R)

School of Social and Political Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Lotte Buch Segal (L)

School of Social and Political Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Nayha Sethi (N)

Centre for Biomedicine, Self & Society, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Ellen Stewart (E)

Centre for Biomedicine, Self & Society, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Marlee Tichenor (M)

School of Social and Political Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Classifications MeSH