From Clay Feet to New Psychology: Starting the Move.
Concepts
Crisis
Development
Epistemology
Evolution
Experience-based research
Genetic logic
Person-centered focus
Semiotics
Journal
Integrative psychological & behavioral science
ISSN: 1936-3567
Titre abrégé: Integr Psychol Behav Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101319534
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2020
09 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
27
6
2020
medline:
11
11
2020
entrez:
27
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This Special Issue sets the stage for constructive integration of psychology with relevant phenomena it needs to study, and with its interdisciplinary collaboration possibilities. Based on a regular submission of an analysis of the conceptual network of psychology (Zagaria et al. 2020) an international constructive discussion ensued, with charting out three potential future pathways to psychology as science: (1) theoretical elaboration of the person-centered and idiographic approaches and move from "evidence-based" to experience-based research; (2) advancement of general developmental science perspective beyond the traditions of evolutionary psychology along the lines of the genetic logic of James Mark Baldwin, and (3) building interdisciplinary synthesis between psychology and semiotics in the domain of cultural psychology. The progress in contemporary biology (epigenetics) and qualitative mathematics can provide the epistemological support for this move.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32588372
doi: 10.1007/s12124-020-09564-x
pii: 10.1007/s12124-020-09564-x
doi:
Substances chimiques
Clay
T1FAD4SS2M
Types de publication
Editorial
Comment
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
515-520Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentOn
Références
Baucal, A., & Krstic, K (2020). Searching for an integrative theoretical framework for psychology: Evolutionary psychology is needed but not sufficient. IPBS: Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 54, 3, xxx-yyy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-020-09551-2
Baumann, S. L. (2010). The limitations of evidenced-based practice. Nursing Science Quarterly, 23(3), 226–230.
pubmed: 20558652
doi: 10.1177/0894318410371833
Brinkmann, S. (2020). Moving on our feet: For a nomadic psychology. IPBS: Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 54, 3, xxx-yyy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-020-09529-0 .
Cairns, R. B., Elder, G., & Costello, E. (Eds.). (1996). Developmental science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Christensen, J. B. (2020). Is psychology an ‘abysmal’ science? IPBS: Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 54, 3, xxx-yyy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-020-09540-5
DeLuca Picione, R. (2020). The semiotic paradigm in psychology: A mature weltanschauung for the definition of semiotic mind. IPBS: Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 54, 3, xxx-yyy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-020-09555-y .
Di Nuovo, S. (2020). Searching for models for psychological science: A possible contribution of simulation. IPBS: Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 54, 3, xxx-yyy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-020-09539-y .
Gamsakhurdia, V. L. (2020). Systematic semiotic organization and anthropologization of the science of soul- towards cultural psychology. IPBS: Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 54, 3, xxx-yyy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-020-09541-4
Gozli, D. (2020). Staying with questions and resisting quick answers. IPBS: Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 54, 3, xxx-yyy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-020-09542-3 .
Jensen, M. (2020). Wrong problem but right answer? . IPBS: Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 54, 3, xxx-yyy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-020-09554-z .
Lundh, L-G. (2020). Persons and genes- is a gene-evolutionary psychology compatible with a person-oriented approach to psychological science? IPBS: Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 54, 3, xxx-yyy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-020-09548-x
Lux, V., & Richter, J.-T. (Eds.). (2014). Kulturen der Epigenetik: Verebt, codiert, übertragen. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Marsico, G., & Calandrini, A. R. (2020). Getting psychology back onto its feet: The developmental view of James mark Baldwin. IPBS: Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 54, 3, xxx-yyy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-020-09535-2 .
Marti, E. (2020). The need for epistemological vigilance. IPBS: Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 54, 3, xxx-yyy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-020-09533-4
Märtsin, M. (2020). Psychology: A discipline in need of reflexive foundation. IPBS: Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 54, 3, xxx-yyy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-020-09552-1
Mazur, L. (2020). Progress in psychological science: The importance of informed ignorance and curiosity-driven questions. IPBS: Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 54, 3, xxx-yyy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-020-09538-z .
Mironenko, I., & Sorokin, P. (2020). Concerning paradigmatic status of psychological science: For a flexible and flowing psychology in the face of practical and theoretical challenges. IPBS: Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 54, 3, xxx-yyy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-020-09530-7
Molenaar, P. (2004). A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: Bringing the person Back into scientific psychology, this time forever. Measurement, 2(4), 201–218.
Molenaar, P., Huizinga, H. M., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2002). The relationship between the structure of inter-individual and intra-individual variability. In U. Staudinger & U. Lindberger (Eds.), Understanding human development (pp. 339–360). Dordrecht: Klüwer.
Pinheiro, M. A. (2020). A Wittgensteinian comment on “psychology: A Giant with feet of clay”—A question from research on creativity. IPBS: Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 54, 3, xxx-yyy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-020-09544-1 .
Rudolph, L. (Ed.). (2013). Qualitative mathematics for the social sciences. London: Routledge.
Salvatore, S., Valsiner, J., Strout-Yagodzinsky, S., & Clegg, J. (Eds.). (2009). YIS: Yearbook of idiographic science 2008, Vol (Vol. 1). Rome: Fireira Publishing.
Salvatore, S., Valsiner, J., Travers Simon, J., & Gennaro, A. (Eds.). (2010a). YIS-2: Yearbook of idiographic science 2009. Roma: Fireira & Luzio.
Salvatore, S., Valsiner, J., Travers Simon, J., & Gennaro, A. (Eds.). (2010b). YIS-3: Yearbook of idiographic science 2010. Roma: Fireira & Luzio.
Sato, T., Mori, N., & Valsiner, J. (Eds.). (2016). Making of the future: The trajectory Equifinality approach in cultural psychology. Charlotte: Information Age Publishers.
Tateo, L. (2020). The Golem of psychology and the ecosystemic epistemology. . IPBS: Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 54, 3, xxx-yyy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-020-09532-5 .
Toomela, A. (2020). Psychology today: Still in denial, still outdated. IPBS: Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 54, 3, xxx-yyy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-020-09534-3 .
Toomela, A., & Valsiner, J. (Eds.). (2010). Methodological thinking in psychology: 60 years gone astray? Charlotte, N.C: Information Age Publishers.
Tsuda, I. (2001). Toward an interpretation of dynamic neural activity in terms of chaotic dynamical systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 793–847.
pubmed: 12239890
doi: 10.1017/S0140525X01000097
Valsiner, J. (Ed.). (1986). The individual subject and scientific psychology. New York: Plenum.
Valsiner, J. (2010). A persistent innovator: James mark Baldwin reconsidered. Introduction to J. M. Baldwin, Genetic theory of reality (pp. xv-lix). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
Valsiner, J. (2017). From methodology to methods in human psychology. New York: Springer.
doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-61064-1
Valsiner, J. (2018). Needed in psychology: Theoretical precision. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 14(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v14i1.602 .
pubmed: 29899794
pmcid: 5973513
doi: 10.5964/ejop.v14i1.602
Valsiner, J. (2019). Culture & Psychology: 25 constructive years. Culture and Psychology, 25(4), 429–469.
doi: 10.1177/1354067X19872358
Valsiner, J., & Sato, T. (2006). Historically structured sampling (HSS): How can psychology’s methodology become tuned in to the reality of the historical nature of cultural psychology? In J. Straub, D. Weidemann, C. Kölbl, & B. Zielke (Eds.), Pursuit of meaning (pp. 215-251). Bielefeld: Transcript.
Varzi, A. (1998). Basic problems of mereotopology. In N. Guarino (Ed.), Formal ontology in information science (pp. 29–38). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Wu, A., & Xu, S. (2020). One step further: Where to put the subjectivity of human mind in efforts of integrating psychology? IPBS: Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 54, 3, xxx-yyy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-020-09549-w
Zagaria, A., Ando, A.,& Zennaro, A. (2020). Psychology: A giant with feet of clay. IPBS: Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 54, 3, xxx-yyy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-020-09524-5 .