Trends in Medicare Reimbursement for Reconstructive Plastic Surgery Procedures: 2000 to 2019.
Journal
Plastic and reconstructive surgery
ISSN: 1529-4242
Titre abrégé: Plast Reconstr Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 1306050
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2020
07 2020
Historique:
entrez:
27
6
2020
pubmed:
27
6
2020
medline:
15
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
An understanding of financial trends is important to advance agreeable reimbursement models in plastic surgery. This study aimed to evaluate trends in Medicare reimbursement rates for the 20 most commonly billed reconstructive plastic surgery procedures from 2000 to 2019. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Physician and Other Supplier Public Use File was used to identify the 20 reconstructive procedures most commonly billed to Medicare by plastic surgeons in 2016. Reimbursement data were extracted from The Physician Fee Schedule Look-Up Tool from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services for each CPT code. Monetary data were adjusted for inflation to 2019 U.S. dollars. Average annual and total percentage changes in reimbursement were calculated based on these adjusted trends. The average adjusted reimbursement for all procedures decreased by 14.0 percent from 2000 to 2019. The greatest mean decrease was observed in complex wound repair of the scalp, arms, or legs (-33.2 percent). The only procedure with an increased adjusted reimbursement rate was layer-closure of the scalp, axillae, trunk, and/or extremities (6.5 percent). From 2000 to 2019, the adjusted reimbursement rate for all procedures decreased by an average of 0.8 percent annually. This is the first comprehensive study evaluating trends in Medicare reimbursement in plastic surgery. When adjusted for inflation, Medicare reimbursement for the included procedures has steadily decreased from 2000 to 2019. Increased consideration of these trends will be important for U.S. policymakers, hospitals, and surgeons to ensure continued access to meaningful reconstructive plastic surgery care.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
An understanding of financial trends is important to advance agreeable reimbursement models in plastic surgery. This study aimed to evaluate trends in Medicare reimbursement rates for the 20 most commonly billed reconstructive plastic surgery procedures from 2000 to 2019.
METHODS
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Physician and Other Supplier Public Use File was used to identify the 20 reconstructive procedures most commonly billed to Medicare by plastic surgeons in 2016. Reimbursement data were extracted from The Physician Fee Schedule Look-Up Tool from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services for each CPT code. Monetary data were adjusted for inflation to 2019 U.S. dollars. Average annual and total percentage changes in reimbursement were calculated based on these adjusted trends.
RESULTS
The average adjusted reimbursement for all procedures decreased by 14.0 percent from 2000 to 2019. The greatest mean decrease was observed in complex wound repair of the scalp, arms, or legs (-33.2 percent). The only procedure with an increased adjusted reimbursement rate was layer-closure of the scalp, axillae, trunk, and/or extremities (6.5 percent). From 2000 to 2019, the adjusted reimbursement rate for all procedures decreased by an average of 0.8 percent annually.
CONCLUSIONS
This is the first comprehensive study evaluating trends in Medicare reimbursement in plastic surgery. When adjusted for inflation, Medicare reimbursement for the included procedures has steadily decreased from 2000 to 2019. Increased consideration of these trends will be important for U.S. policymakers, hospitals, and surgeons to ensure continued access to meaningful reconstructive plastic surgery care.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32590666
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006914
pii: 00006534-202007000-00034
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1541-1551Références
Uppal S, Shahin MS, Rathbun JA, Goff BA. Since surgery isn’t getting any easier, why is reimbursement going down? An update from the SGO taskforce on coding and reimbursement. Gynecol Oncol. 2017;144:235–237.
Oliver TR, Lee PR, Lipton HL. A political history of Medicare and prescription drug coverage. Milbank Q. 2004;82:283–354.
Cutler DM, Rosen AB, Vijan S. The value of medical spending in the United States, 1960-2000. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:920–927.
Eltorai AEM, Durand WM, Haglin JM, Rubin LE, Weiss AC, Daniels AH. Trends in Medicare reimbursement for orthopedic procedures: 2000 to 2016. Orthopedics 2018;41:95–102.
Haglin J, Richter K, Patel N. Trends in Medicare reimbursement for neurosurgical procedures: 2000 to 2018. J Neurosurg. 2019;132:649–652.
Haglin JM, Eltorai A, Richter KR, Jogerst K, Daniels A. Medicare reimbursement for general surgery procedures: 2000 to 2018. Ann Surg. 2019;271:17–22.
Vu CC, Lanni TB, Nandalur SR. Trends in Medicare reimbursement and work relative value unit production in radiation oncology. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018;15:870–875.
Krieger LM, Lee GK. The economics of plastic surgery practices: Trends in income, procedure mix, and volume. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114:192–199.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Medicare provider utilization and payment data: Physician and other supplier. Available at: https://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics-Trends-and-Reports/Medicare-Provider-Charge-Data/Physician-and-Other-Supplier.html. Accessed June 1, 2019.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Physician fee schedule lookup tool. Available at: https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/PFSlookup. Accessed June 1, 2019.
CoinNews Media Group. US inflation calculator. Available at: http://www.usinflationcalculator.com. Accessed June 1, 2019.
Investopedia. Compound annual growth rate—CAGR. Available at: http://investopedia.com/terms/c/cagr.asp. Accessed June 1, 2019.
Smoldt R, Cortese D, Landman N, Gans D. Medicare physician payment: Why it’s still a problem, and what to do now. Health Affairs Blog. January 27, 2017. Available at: https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hblog20170127.058490/full/. Accessed June 1, 2019.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Percentage of Medicare participating physicians and limited license practitioners. 2010. Washington, DC: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services; Available at: https://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics-Trends-and-Reports/NationalHealthExpendData/Downloads/highlights.pdf. Accessed June 1, 2019.
Rosenow JM, Orrico KO. Neurosurgeons’ responses to changing Medicare reimbursement. Neurosurg Focus 2014;37:E12.
Patel A, Clune JE, Forte A, Chang CC. The impact of the Medicare sustainable growth rate formula on reconstructive plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:270e–271e.
Deleyiannis FW, Porter AC. Economic factors affecting head and neck reconstructive microsurgery: The surgeons’ and hospital’s perspective. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120:157–165.
Alderman AK, Storey AF, Nair NS, Chung KC. Financial impact of breast reconstruction on an academic surgical practice. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123:1408–1413.
Kulkarni AR, Sears ED, Atisha DM, Alderman AK. Use of autologous and microsurgical breast reconstruction by U.S. plastic surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132:534–541.
Congressional Budget Office. CBO’s August 2010 baseline: Medicare. Available at: http://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/cbofiles/attachments/MedicareAugust2010FactSheet.pdf. Accessed June 1, 2018.
Squitieri L, Chung KC. Value-based payment reform and the Medicare Access and Children’s Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2015: A primer for plastic surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140:205–214.
Wilensky GR. Developing a viable alternative to Medicare’s physician payment strategy. Health Aff (Millwood) 2014;33:153–160.
Davidge K, Armstrong KA, Brown M, et al. Shifting autologous breast reconstruction into an ambulatory setting: Patient-reported quality of recovery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136:657–665.
Sheckter CC, Razdan SN, Disa JJ, Mehrara BJ, Matros E. Conceptual considerations for payment bundling in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;141:294–300.
Resnick MJ, Graves AJ, Buntin MB, Richards MR, Penson DF. Surgeon participation in early Accountable Care Organizations. Ann Surg. 2018;267:401–407.
Hawken SR, Herrel LA, Ellimoottil C, Ye Z, Hollenbeck BK, Miller DC. Urologist participation in Medicare shared savings program Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs). Urology 2016;90:76–80.