Concurrent amplification of Zika, chikungunya, and yellow fever virus in a sylvatic focus of arboviruses in Southeastern Senegal, 2015.
Amplification
Chikungunya virus
Concurrent
Mosquito vectors
Southeastern Senegal
Yellow fever virus
Zika virus
Journal
BMC microbiology
ISSN: 1471-2180
Titre abrégé: BMC Microbiol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100966981
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 06 2020
26 06 2020
Historique:
received:
04
03
2020
accepted:
18
06
2020
entrez:
28
6
2020
pubmed:
28
6
2020
medline:
27
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Chikungunya (CHIKV), yellow fever (YFV) and Zika (ZIKV) viruses circulate in sylvatic transmission cycles in southeastern Senegal, where they share common hosts and vectors. All three viruses undergo periodic amplifications, during which they are detected in mosquitoes and sometimes in hosts. However, little is known about their spatio-temporal patterns in years in which they undergo concurrent amplification. The aim of this study was to describe the co-amplification of ZIKV, CHIKV, and YFV, and the daily dynamics of these arboviruses and theirs vectors within villages in southeastern Senegal. Mosquitoes were collected monthly from July to December 2015. Each evening, from 6 to 9 PM, landing collections were performed by teams of 3 persons working simultaneously in 70 sites situated in forest (canopy and ground), savannah, agriculture, barren, and village (indoor and outdoor) land covers. Collections within villages were continued until 6 AM. Mosquitoes were tested for virus infection by virus isolation and RT-PCR. Seventy-five mosquito pools comprising 10 mosquito species contained at least one virus. Ae. furcifer and Ae. luteocephalus were infected by all three viruses, Ae. taylori by YFV and ZIKV, and remaining seven species by only, only YFV or only ZIKV. No single mosquito pool contained more than one virus. CHIKV was the only virus detected in all land cover classes and was found in the greatest number of sampling sites (32.9%, n = 70). The proportion of sites in which more than one virus was detected was less than 6%. Ae. aegypti formosus, Ae. furcifer, Ae. luteocephalus, Ae. minutus, Ae. vittatus, and An. gambiae were found within villages. These vectors were mainly active around dusk but Ae. furcifer was collected until dawn. All viruses save ZIKV were detected indoors and outdoors, mainly around dusk. Virus positive pools were detected over 2, 3 and 4 months for YFV, CHIKV and ZIKV, respectively. Our data indicate that the distribution of different vector species and different arboviruses vary substantially between sites, suggesting that CHIKV, YFV, and ZIKV may have different transmission cycles in Southeastern Senegal.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Chikungunya (CHIKV), yellow fever (YFV) and Zika (ZIKV) viruses circulate in sylvatic transmission cycles in southeastern Senegal, where they share common hosts and vectors. All three viruses undergo periodic amplifications, during which they are detected in mosquitoes and sometimes in hosts. However, little is known about their spatio-temporal patterns in years in which they undergo concurrent amplification. The aim of this study was to describe the co-amplification of ZIKV, CHIKV, and YFV, and the daily dynamics of these arboviruses and theirs vectors within villages in southeastern Senegal.
RESULTS
Mosquitoes were collected monthly from July to December 2015. Each evening, from 6 to 9 PM, landing collections were performed by teams of 3 persons working simultaneously in 70 sites situated in forest (canopy and ground), savannah, agriculture, barren, and village (indoor and outdoor) land covers. Collections within villages were continued until 6 AM. Mosquitoes were tested for virus infection by virus isolation and RT-PCR. Seventy-five mosquito pools comprising 10 mosquito species contained at least one virus. Ae. furcifer and Ae. luteocephalus were infected by all three viruses, Ae. taylori by YFV and ZIKV, and remaining seven species by only, only YFV or only ZIKV. No single mosquito pool contained more than one virus. CHIKV was the only virus detected in all land cover classes and was found in the greatest number of sampling sites (32.9%, n = 70). The proportion of sites in which more than one virus was detected was less than 6%. Ae. aegypti formosus, Ae. furcifer, Ae. luteocephalus, Ae. minutus, Ae. vittatus, and An. gambiae were found within villages. These vectors were mainly active around dusk but Ae. furcifer was collected until dawn. All viruses save ZIKV were detected indoors and outdoors, mainly around dusk. Virus positive pools were detected over 2, 3 and 4 months for YFV, CHIKV and ZIKV, respectively.
CONCLUSION
Our data indicate that the distribution of different vector species and different arboviruses vary substantially between sites, suggesting that CHIKV, YFV, and ZIKV may have different transmission cycles in Southeastern Senegal.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32590939
doi: 10.1186/s12866-020-01866-9
pii: 10.1186/s12866-020-01866-9
pmc: PMC7318437
doi:
Substances chimiques
RNA, Viral
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
181Références
J Med Entomol. 1986 Mar 31;23(2):196-200
pubmed: 3701804
J Med Entomol. 2015 May;52(3):447-51
pubmed: 26334820
Emerg Infect Dis. 2003 Mar;9(3):362-7
pubmed: 12643833
J Med Entomol. 2019 Feb 25;56(2):453-463
pubmed: 30428055
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2014 Jun;90(6):1003-13
pubmed: 24615140
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 Jun 1;11(6):e0005654
pubmed: 28570693
Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 1993;86(2):90-100
pubmed: 8102567
Emerg Infect Dis. 2009 Apr;15(4):591-3
pubmed: 19331740
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 Apr 12;10(4):e0004636
pubmed: 27070912
J Med Entomol. 1994 Jul;31(4):623-7
pubmed: 7932611
Bull World Health Organ. 1968;39(6):845-58
pubmed: 5306098
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017 Apr;96(4):903-912
pubmed: 28115671
CMAJ. 2016 Feb 2;188(2):E34
pubmed: 26696621
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1999 Feb;60(2):281-6
pubmed: 10072152
Parasit Vectors. 2012 Dec 07;5:286
pubmed: 23216815
Trop Med Infect Dis. 2020 Apr 01;5(2):
pubmed: 32244739
Nat Commun. 2017 May 19;8:15412
pubmed: 28524874
Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1964 Mar;58:45-51
pubmed: 14147664
Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 1994;87(4):267-77
pubmed: 7866049
Emerg Infect Dis. 2014 Mar;20(3):456-9
pubmed: 24572297
Res Virol. 1992 Nov-Dec;143(6):417-22
pubmed: 1297177
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(6):e1649
pubmed: 22720097
Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1974 Mar;68(1):59-68
pubmed: 4152305
Acta Trop. 2020 Jun;206:105441
pubmed: 32173316
J Infect Dev Ctries. 2015 Jul 04;9(6):684-5
pubmed: 26142684
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015 Jan;92(1):88-97
pubmed: 25404071
Virol J. 2013 Oct 22;10:311
pubmed: 24148652
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2013 Mar;107(3):200-3
pubmed: 23423342
Euro Surveill. 2010 Feb 18;15(7):
pubmed: 20184854
Parasit Vectors. 2018 Apr 19;11(1):255
pubmed: 29673389
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 13;9(10):e109442
pubmed: 25310102
PLoS Curr. 2018 Mar 15;10:
pubmed: 29637009
J Travel Med. 2016 Mar 16;23(3):
pubmed: 26984354
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010 Jun 08;4(6):e706
pubmed: 20544013