Prioritizing river basins for intensive monitoring and assessment by the US Geological Survey.

Basin selection Federal research Hydrology Monitoring design

Journal

Environmental monitoring and assessment
ISSN: 1573-2959
Titre abrégé: Environ Monit Assess
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8508350

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
27 Jun 2020
Historique:
received: 04 02 2020
accepted: 02 06 2020
entrez: 29 6 2020
pubmed: 1 7 2020
medline: 11 7 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The US Geological Survey (USGS) is currently (2020) integrating its water science programs to better address the nation's greatest water resource challenges now and into the future. This integration will rely, in part, on data from 10 or more intensively monitored river basins from across the USA. A team of USGS scientists was convened to develop a systematic, quantitative approach to prioritize candidate basins for this monitoring investment to ensure that, as a group, the 10 basins will support the assessment and forecasting objectives of the major USGS water science programs. Candidate basins were the level-4 hydrologic units (HUC04) with some of the smaller HUC04s being combined; median candidate-basin area is 46,600 km

Identifiants

pubmed: 32594332
doi: 10.1007/s10661-020-08403-1
pii: 10.1007/s10661-020-08403-1
pmc: PMC7320945
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

458

Commentaires et corrections

Type : ErratumIn

Références

Sci Total Environ. 2019 Apr 10;660:1472-1485
pubmed: 30743940
Ambio. 2003 Feb;32(1):13-8
pubmed: 12691486
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 16;14(10):e0222714
pubmed: 31618213
J Environ Manage. 2009 Jul;90(10):2987-98
pubmed: 19501953
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Feb 1;613-614:1469-1488
pubmed: 28802893
Environ Manage. 2004;34 Suppl 1:S71-88
pubmed: 16044554
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Feb 15;651(Pt 2):2615-2630
pubmed: 30340196
Environ Monit Assess. 2019 Nov 28;191(12):776
pubmed: 31776793
Environ Sci Technol. 2019 Jan 2;53(1):452-462
pubmed: 30532975
J Environ Manage. 2008 Jun;87(4):639-48
pubmed: 17459570
J Environ Qual. 2009 Jul 23;38(5):1841-7
pubmed: 19643749
Environ Sci Technol. 2019 Mar 19;53(6):2950-2960
pubmed: 30834750

Auteurs

Peter C Van Metre (PC)

US Geological Survey, Austin, TX, USA. pcvanmet@usgs.gov.

Sharon Qi (S)

US Geological Survey, Portland, OR, USA.

Jeffrey Deacon (J)

US Geological Survey, Richmond, VA, USA.

Cheryl Dieter (C)

US Geological Survey, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Jessica M Driscoll (JM)

US Geological Survey, Lakewood, CO, USA.

Michael Fienen (M)

US Geological Survey, Madison, WI, USA.

Terry Kenney (T)

US Geological Survey, West Valley City, UT, USA.

Patrick Lambert (P)

US Geological Survey, West Valley City, UT, USA.

David Lesmes (D)

US Geological Survey, Reston, VA, USA.

Christopher A Mason (CA)

US Geological Survey, Richmond, VA, USA.

Anke Mueller-Solger (A)

US Geological Survey, Sacramento, CA, USA.

Marylynn Musgrove (M)

US Geological Survey, Austin, TX, USA.

Jaime Painter (J)

US Geological Survey, Norcross, GA, USA.

Donald Rosenberry (D)

US Geological Survey, Lakewood, CO, USA.

Lori Sprague (L)

US Geological Survey, Lakewood, CO, USA.

Anthony J Tesoriero (AJ)

US Geological Survey, Portland, OR, USA.

Lisamarie Windham-Myers (L)

US Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA, USA.

David Wolock (D)

US Geological Survey, Lawrence, KS, USA.

Articles similaires

1.00
Humans Female Sick Leave Norway Sinusitis
Humans Mobile Applications Hepatitis C Male Female
Humans Male Female Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice Middle Aged
Humans Congenital Disorders of Glycosylation Female Male Surveys and Questionnaires

Classifications MeSH