Church attendance and alloparenting: an analysis of fertility, social support and child development among English mothers.
ALSPAC
alloparenting
cooperation
fertility
ritual
social support
Journal
Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences
ISSN: 1471-2970
Titre abrégé: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7503623
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 08 2020
17 08 2020
Historique:
entrez:
30
6
2020
pubmed:
1
7
2020
medline:
10
4
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Many aspects of religious rituals suggest they provide adaptive benefits. Studies across societies consistently find that investments in ritual behaviour return high levels of cooperation. Another line of research finds that alloparental support to mothers increases maternal fertility and improves child outcomes. Although plausible, whether religious cooperation extends to alloparenting and/or affects child development remains unclear. Using 10 years of data collected from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC), we test the predictions that church attendance is positively associated with social support and fertility (
Identifiants
pubmed: 32594868
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0428
pmc: PMC7423262
doi:
Banques de données
figshare
['10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5004506']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
20190428Subventions
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_PC_15018
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_PC_19009
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 102215/2/13/2
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
Psychol Sci. 2013 Jul 1;24(7):1301-8
pubmed: 23640065
Int J Epidemiol. 2008 Dec;37(6):1408-21
pubmed: 18577530
Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Mar 22;279(1731):1155-60
pubmed: 21920986
Hum Nat. 2004 Dec;15(4):343-64
pubmed: 26189411
Demography. 1993 Aug;30(3):385-404
pubmed: 8405605
Am J Hum Biol. 2002 Mar-Apr;14(2):233-56
pubmed: 11891936
Annu Rev Anthropol. 1999;28:397-430
pubmed: 12295622
Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Feb;42(1):111-27
pubmed: 22507743
J Fam Psychol. 2001 Dec;15(4):559-96
pubmed: 11770466
Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Jul 22;278(1715):2223-32
pubmed: 21147798
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2005;9(4):360-75
pubmed: 16223357
Appl Neuropsychol. 2008;15(2):131-9
pubmed: 18568606
Popul Dev Rev. 2011;37(Suppl 1):81-112
pubmed: 21280366
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Feb 12;366(1563):333-43
pubmed: 21199838
Hum Nat. 2014 Mar;25(1):136-60
pubmed: 24522974
R Soc Open Sci. 2016 May 18;3(5):160087
pubmed: 27293787
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jun 19;109(25):9781-5
pubmed: 22665788
Psychol Sci. 2015 Sep;26(9):1368-76
pubmed: 26187247
Popul Stud (Camb). 1996 Nov;50(3):361-87
pubmed: 11618374
Epidemiology. 2013 Jan;24(1):1-9
pubmed: 23211345
Evol Psychol. 2018 Oct-Dec;16(4):1474704918817644
pubmed: 30558444
Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Feb;42(1):97-110
pubmed: 22507742
Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Aug 22;278(1717):2519-27
pubmed: 21227968
Nat Commun. 2020 Jan 14;11(1):266
pubmed: 31937789
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Sep 27;113(39):10824-9
pubmed: 27601650
Popul Stud (Camb). 2017 Nov;71(3):345-361
pubmed: 28818017
Hum Nat. 2014 Jun;25(2):269-84
pubmed: 24838742
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Feb 05;281(1779):20132732
pubmed: 24500166
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 May 14;110(20):8045-50
pubmed: 23630293
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 18;8(12):e83667
pubmed: 24367605
Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Nov 7;279(1746):4342-51
pubmed: 22933371
Demography. 2016 Jun;53(3):723-48
pubmed: 27173795
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e56941
pubmed: 23516398
Hum Nat. 2005 Dec;16(4):323-59
pubmed: 26189836
Psychol Sci. 2013 Aug;24(8):1602-5
pubmed: 23740550
Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Apr 7;275(1636):827-33
pubmed: 18077252