Outcome of Extracorporeal Photopheresis as an Add-On Therapy for Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Lung Transplant Recipients.
Antibody-mediated rejection
Extracorporeal photopheresis
Lung transplantation
Journal
Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie
ISSN: 1660-3796
Titre abrégé: Transfus Med Hemother
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101176417
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2020
Jun 2020
Historique:
received:
10
02
2020
accepted:
26
03
2020
entrez:
30
6
2020
pubmed:
1
7
2020
medline:
1
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The diagnosis and treatment of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) after lung transplantation has recently gained recognition within the transplant community. Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP), currently used to treat chronic lung allograft dysfunction, modulates various pathways of the immune system known to be involved in AMR. We hypothesize that adding ECP to established AMR treatments could prevent the rebound of donor-specific antibodies (DSA). This study aimed to analyze the role of ECP as an add-on therapy to prevent the rebound of DSA. Lung transplant recipients who received ECP as an add-on therapy for pulmonary AMR between January 2010 and January 2019 were included in this single-center retrospective analysis. Baseline demographics of the patients, as well as their immunological characteristics and long-term transplant outcomes, were analyzed. A total of 41 patients developed clinical AMR during the study period. Sixteen patients received ECP as an add-on therapy after first-line AMR treatment. Among the 16 patients, 2 (13%) had pretransplant DSA, both against human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I (B38, B13, and C06). Fifteen patients (94%) developed de novo DSA (dnDSA), i.e., 10 (63%) against class I and 14 (88%) against class II. The median time to dnDSA after lung transplantation was 361 days (range 25-2,548). According to the most recent International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) consensus report, 2 (13%) patients had definite clinical AMR, 6 (38%) had probable AMR, and 7 (44%) had possible AMR. The median mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of dnDSA at the time of clinical diagnosis was 4,220 (range 1,319-10,552) for anti-HLA class I and 10,953 (range 1,969-27,501) for anti-HLA class II antibodies. ECP was performed for a median of 14 cycles (range 1-64). MFI values of dnDSA against HLA classes I and II were significantly reduced over the treatment period (for anti-class I: 752; range 70-2,066; for anti-class II: 5,612; range 1,689-21,858). The 1-year survival rate was 55%. No adverse events related to ECP were reported in any of the patients. ECP is associated with a reduction of dnDSA in lung transplant recipients affected by AMR. Prospective studies are warranted to confirm the beneficial effects of ECP in the setting of AMR.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32595425
doi: 10.1159/000508170
pii: tmh-0047-0205
pmc: PMC7315205
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
205-213Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 by S. Karger AG, Basel.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
P.J. and N.W. report speakers' fees and research grants from Therakos Mallinckrodt.
Références
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2007 Dec;26(12):1229-42
pubmed: 18096473
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2016 Apr;35(4):397-406
pubmed: 27044531
Transpl Immunol. 2012 Dec;27(4):171-4
pubmed: 22910399
Kidney Int. 2012 Sep;82(5):598-604
pubmed: 22622504
Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Apr;95(4):e79-81
pubmed: 23522237
Am J Transplant. 2009 Nov;9(11):2532-41
pubmed: 19843031
Am J Transplant. 2005 Jan;5(1):131-8
pubmed: 15636621
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013 Dec;32(12):1270-1
pubmed: 24041981
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013 Jan;32(1):70-7
pubmed: 23260706
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2014 Dec;33(12):1273-81
pubmed: 25130554
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2010 Sep;29(9):973-80
pubmed: 20558084
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2009 Jan;28(1):96-100
pubmed: 19134538
J Heart Lung Transplant. 1992 Jul-Aug;11(4 Pt 1):746-50
pubmed: 1498142
Transplantation. 1998 Mar 15;65(5):648-53
pubmed: 9521198
Immunology. 1997 Jul;91(3):458-63
pubmed: 9301537
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2014 Sep;33(9):950-6
pubmed: 24906794
J Immunol. 2005 May 15;174(10):5968-76
pubmed: 15879089
Clin Transplant. 2000 Apr;14(2):162-6
pubmed: 10770423
Transpl Immunol. 2013 Jan;28(1):1-5
pubmed: 23220148
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013 Oct;32(10):1034-40
pubmed: 23953920
Am J Transplant. 2007 Jan;7(1):117-21
pubmed: 17109725
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Jul;160(1):320-327.e1
pubmed: 31932054
Transpl Int. 2018 Jul;31(7):761-772
pubmed: 29537702
Am J Transplant. 2007 Apr;7(4):847-56
pubmed: 17391128
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013 Jan;32(1):98-105
pubmed: 23142561
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 May;155(5):2193-2206.e3
pubmed: 29653665
Ann Pharmacother. 2012 Jan;46(1):e2
pubmed: 22202499
Transpl Immunol. 2004 Jun-Jul;13(1):63-71
pubmed: 15203130
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013 Jan;32(1):14-21
pubmed: 23260701
Am J Transplant. 2006 Oct;6(10):2316-20
pubmed: 16925566
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015 Jan;34(1):50-58
pubmed: 25447575
J Clin Apher. 2013 Aug;28(4):301-8
pubmed: 23426730
J Clin Apher. 2002;17(4):177-82
pubmed: 12494410
J Clin Apher. 2006 Apr;21(1):72-7
pubmed: 16619230
Transplantation. 2002 Sep 27;74(6):799-804
pubmed: 12364858
Am J Transplant. 2017 May;17(5):1380-1388
pubmed: 28173620