Efficacy of stem cell allograft in maxillary sinus bone regeneration: a randomized controlled clinical and blinded histomorphometric study.

Allograft Dental implant Maxillary sinus floor augmentation Sinus width Stem cells

Journal

International journal of implant dentistry
ISSN: 2198-4034
Titre abrégé: Int J Implant Dent
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101676532

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
29 Jun 2020
Historique:
received: 19 03 2020
accepted: 24 04 2020
entrez: 30 6 2020
pubmed: 1 7 2020
medline: 1 7 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

This study aimed to evaluate the quality and quantity of newly generated bone in the maxillary sinus grafted with stem cell-based allograft material. This study was a single site, prospective, blinded, randomized, and controlled clinical trial. Eleven subjects with 18 edentulous posterior maxillary sites requiring sinus augmentation for delayed implant placement using a lateral window approach were enrolled. At the time of sinus augmentation, test sinus was grafted with stem cell-based allograft (Osteocel Plus; NuVasive Therapeutics), while the control sinus was grafted with conventional cortico-cancellous allograft (alloOss; ACE Surgical). Cone beam computer tomography (CBCT) scan was taken before and 14 weeks post-sinus augmentation procedure, i.e., 2 weeks before implant placement. Thirty-six trephined core bone biopsies were harvested from the anterior and posterior grafted lateral-window osteotomy sites at the time of implant placement. The results showed a statistically significant difference in the vital bone percentage between the test and the control groups at the posterior grafted sites (p = 0.03). There was no significant difference in the percentage of vital bone between the anterior and posterior grafted sites within the test and control groups (p > .05). The CBCT analysis showed that the maxillary sinuses at the posterior grafted sites were statistically wider than those at the anterior grafted sites in both groups (p < .05). Different allograft bone materials can be used in the maxillary sinus augmentation procedures. Stem cell allograft has more osteogenic potential with a better outcome in the wide posterior sinus.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32596764
doi: 10.1186/s40729-020-00222-w
pii: 10.1186/s40729-020-00222-w
pmc: PMC7321846
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

25

Subventions

Organisme : ICOI
ID : IDREF Grant # 3048113648.

Références

Implant Dent. 2009 Oct;18(5):402-12
pubmed: 22129958
Biomed Mater. 2010 Dec;5(6):062001
pubmed: 20924139
Implant Dent. 2005 Dec;14(4):336-8
pubmed: 16361882
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Jul;20(7):691-700
pubmed: 19453567
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2010 Dec;224(12):1455-70
pubmed: 21287831
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Dec;26(12):1450-5
pubmed: 25283800
Cell Transplant. 2004;13(4):343-55
pubmed: 15468676
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003 Aug;23(4):313-23
pubmed: 12956475
Tissue Eng. 2006 Sep;12(9):2649-56
pubmed: 16995798
J Clin Periodontol. 2013 Apr;40(4):387-95
pubmed: 23432761
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008 Jan-Feb;23(1):48-56
pubmed: 18416412
Implant Dent. 2011 Dec;20(6):413-7
pubmed: 22071496
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Jan;47(1):103-116
pubmed: 28545806
J Periodontol. 2010 Jul;81(7):1041-50
pubmed: 20450402
Gen Dent. 2015 Jul-Aug;63(4):47-54
pubmed: 26147168
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 Jul-Aug;28(4):1009-16
pubmed: 23869359
J Periodontol. 2003 Jul;74(7):990-9
pubmed: 12931761
Implant Dent. 2017 Jun;26(3):438-464
pubmed: 28520572
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000 Jun;11(3):256-65
pubmed: 11168217
J Clin Periodontol. 2005 Feb;32(2):193-9
pubmed: 15691351
J Oral Rehabil. 2013 Sep;40(9):693-706
pubmed: 23834336
J Periodontal Res. 2017 Jun;52(3):301-312
pubmed: 27534916
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Sep;27(9):1106-22
pubmed: 26452326
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2010 Dec;224(12):1523-32
pubmed: 21287835
Dent Clin North Am. 1986 Apr;30(2):207-29
pubmed: 3516738
Head Face Med. 2009 Jun 11;5:12
pubmed: 19519903
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005 Sep-Oct;20(5):784-7
pubmed: 16274154
J Periodontol. 1998 Aug;69(8):911-9
pubmed: 9736374

Auteurs

Josh Whitt (J)

University of Kentucky College of Dentistry, Lexington, KY, USA.

Mohanad Al-Sabbagh (M)

Division of Periodontology, University of Kentucky College of Dentistry, Lexington, KY, USA.

Dolphus Dawson (D)

University of Kentucky College of Dentistry, Lexington, KY, USA.

Ehab Shehata (E)

Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Kentucky College of Dentistry, Lexington, KY, USA.

Moly Housley-Smith (M)

Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Kentucky College of Dentistry, Lexington, KY, USA.

Alejandro Tezanos (A)

Department of Statistics, University of Kentucky College of Dentistry, Lexington, KY, USA.

Ahmad Kutkut (A)

Division of Prosthodontics, University of Kentucky College of Dentistry, 800 Rose St. D646, Lexington, KY, 40536, USA. ahmad.kutkut@uky.edu.

Classifications MeSH