Stereotypes about compassion across the political spectrum.
Journal
Emotion (Washington, D.C.)
ISSN: 1931-1516
Titre abrégé: Emotion
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101125678
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2022
Apr 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
1
7
2020
medline:
5
4
2022
entrez:
30
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To what extent are ideological differences in compassion real or exaggerated, and who is more likely to engage in stereotyping about such differences? In five studies, including three online studies and two field studies of voters at the Iowa Caucus and U.S. Presidential Election in 2016, we found evidence for political stereotyping about compassion. Although Democratic and Republican participants did not consistently rate themselves as feeling different amounts of compassion on a single-item self-assessment, there was a stereotype that the average Democrat/liberal is more compassionate than the average Republican/conservative. Importantly, this stereotype exaggerated the extent of self-reported differences in compassion across parties in these samples, and Democratic participants engaged in stronger stereotype exaggeration. These results suggest that although there can be ideological variability in compassion, the perceived difference may exaggerate this reality. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
Identifiants
pubmed: 32597670
pii: 2020-46647-001
doi: 10.1037/emo0000820
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
466-478Subventions
Organisme : National Science Foundation
Organisme : John Templeton Foundation
Organisme : Rock Ethics Institute