Phase 0 and window of opportunity clinical trial design in neuro-oncology: a RANO review.
clinical trial
glioblastoma
pharmacodynamics
pharmacokinetics
phase 0
Journal
Neuro-oncology
ISSN: 1523-5866
Titre abrégé: Neuro Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100887420
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 11 2020
26 11 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
1
7
2020
medline:
17
3
2021
entrez:
30
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Glioblastoma is a devastating disease with poor prognosis. Few effective chemotherapeutics are currently available, and much effort has been expended to identify new drugs capable of slowing tumor progression. The phase 0 trial design was developed to facilitate early identification of promising agents for cancer that should undergo accelerated approval. This design features an early in-human study that enrolls a small number of patients who receive subtherapeutic doses of medication with the goals of describing pharmacokinetics through drug blood level measurements and determining intratumoral concentrations of the investigational compound as well as pharmacodynamics by studying the biochemical and physiological effects of drugs. In neuro-oncology, however, the presence of the blood-brain barrier and difficulty in obtaining brain tumor tissue warrant a separate set of considerations. In this paper, we critically reviewed the protocols used in all brain tumor related in-human phase 0 and phase 0-like ("window of opportunity") studies between 1993 and 2018, as well as ongoing clinical trials, and identified major challenges in trial design as applied to central nervous system tumors that include surgical specimen collection and storage, brain tumor drug level analysis, and confirmation of drug action. We therefore propose that phase 0 trials in neuro-oncology should include (i) only patients in whom a resection of the tumor is planned, (ii) use of clinical doses of an investigational agent, (iii) tissue sampling from enhancing and non-enhancing portions of the tumor, and (iv) assessment of drug-specific target effects. Standardization of clinical protocols for phase 0/window of opportunity studies can help accelerate the development of effective treatments for glioblastoma.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32598442
pii: 5864766
doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa149
pmc: PMC7690357
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1568-1579Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA227136
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R01 NS079697
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Références
Neuro Oncol. 2002 Oct;4(4):268-77
pubmed: 12356357
Clin Cancer Res. 2008 Jun 15;14(12):3658-63
pubmed: 18559579
Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Oct 1;25(19):5777-5786
pubmed: 31285369
N Engl J Med. 2001 Jan 11;344(2):114-23
pubmed: 11150363
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Mar 20;37(9):741-750
pubmed: 30715997
Neuro Oncol. 2016 Apr;18(4):557-64
pubmed: 26449250
Neuro Oncol. 2008 Aug;10(4):631-42
pubmed: 18559968
JAMA. 2017 Dec 19;318(23):2306-2316
pubmed: 29260225
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Dec 15;23(24):7454-7466
pubmed: 28928160
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2004 Aug;3(8):711-5
pubmed: 15286737
Neurooncol Pract. 2016 Dec;3(4):245-260
pubmed: 31385988
Clin Cancer Res. 2008 Jun 15;14(12):3664-9
pubmed: 18559580
Clin Cancer Res. 2004 Jun 1;10(11):3885-96
pubmed: 15173098
Neuro Oncol. 2017 Nov 6;19(suppl_5):v1-v88
pubmed: 29117289
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2016 Aug 15;1028:25-32
pubmed: 27318641
Br J Cancer. 1993 Feb;67(2):358-61
pubmed: 8431366
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Feb 1;25(4):399-404
pubmed: 17264335
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Oct 1;22(19):4786-4796
pubmed: 27154916
Semin Oncol. 2016 Aug;43(4):514-25
pubmed: 27663483
Drug Metab Dispos. 2013 Jan;41(1):33-9
pubmed: 23014761
Clin Cancer Res. 2009 Oct 1;15(19):6258-66
pubmed: 19789313
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2012 Apr;69(4):849-60
pubmed: 22037923
J Neurooncol. 2012 Jan;106(1):147-53
pubmed: 21739168
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1999;44(2):173-6
pubmed: 10412954
NeuroRx. 2005 Jan;2(1):3-14
pubmed: 15717053
Clin Cancer Res. 2008 Jun 15;14(12):3670-4
pubmed: 18559581
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Apr 20;27(12):2052-8
pubmed: 19307505
J Neurooncol. 2016 Aug;129(1):139-46
pubmed: 27300524
Clin Cancer Res. 2013 Mar 15;19(6):1567-76
pubmed: 23349317
Mol Cancer Ther. 2011 Jun;10(6):1102-12
pubmed: 21471286
Cancer J. 2008 May-Jun;14(3):133-7
pubmed: 18536551
J Neurooncol. 2009 Jan;91(1):51-8
pubmed: 18787762
J Clin Oncol. 1998 Nov;16(11):3570-5
pubmed: 9817277
Neuro Oncol. 2018 Feb 19;20(3):307-312
pubmed: 29016919
Neuroimage Clin. 2018 Jul 05;20:51-60
pubmed: 30069427
Clin Cancer Res. 2008 Jun 15;14(12):3692-7
pubmed: 18559585
Stat Med. 2010 May 10;29(10):1072-6
pubmed: 20419759
Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2014 Sep 30;76:98-115
pubmed: 25078721
J Neurooncol. 2001 Jul;53(3):267-71
pubmed: 11718259
Clin Cancer Res. 2007 Dec 15;13(24):7401-6
pubmed: 18094423
Neuro Oncol. 2014 Apr;16(4):567-78
pubmed: 24470557
Clin Cancer Res. 2005 Nov 1;11(21):7841-50
pubmed: 16278407
N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 10;352(10):987-96
pubmed: 15758009
Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Aug 15;24(16):3820-3828
pubmed: 29798906
Neuro Oncol. 2017 Apr 1;19(4):567-575
pubmed: 27663390