Bacterial remediation of heavy metal polluted soil and effluent from paper mill industry.

Effluent Heavy metals Non-protobacteria Proteobacteria Rate of removal Remediation Soil

Journal

Environmental analysis, health and toxicology
ISSN: 2671-9525
Titre abrégé: Environ Anal Health Toxicol
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101758126

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2020
Historique:
received: 28 03 2019
accepted: 23 05 2019
entrez: 1 7 2020
pubmed: 1 7 2020
medline: 1 7 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Bacterial remediation of heavy metal polluted soil and effluent from paper mill was investigated using standard analytical methods. The paper mill was visited for 6 months at interval of 30 days to collect soil and effluent samples for the analysis. The pH of soil was slightly alkaline while effluent was acidic. There was a significant increase (P < 0.05) in total organic carbon (TOC) of soil; and turbidity, biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), chemical oxygen demand (COD) and TOC of effluent when compared to control. Bacteria isolated from the samples were grouped into two and used to remediate eight heavy metals. The remediation experiment consists of three treatments; Treatment 1 (treated with proteobacteria), Treatment 2 (treated with non-proteobacteria) and Treatment 3 (without bacteria) (control experiment). Result of the remediation study showed that there was a significant decrease (P < 0.05) in Treatment 1 and Treatment 2 of all the heavy metals in soil and effluent samples from day 30-180 when compared to day 0. The rate of removal of heavy metals in soil was highest in Treatment 1 for chromium (Cr; 0.00846 day-1) and lowest in Treatment 1 for cadmium (Cd; 0.00403 day-1) while the rate of removal in effluent was highest in Treatment 1 for zinc (Zn; 0.01207 day-1) and lowest in Treatment 1 for Cd (0.00391 day-1). It was concluded that bacteria isolated from soil and effluent samples were capable of remediating the concentration of Pb, arsenic (As), Cr, Zn and nickel (Ni) heavy metals.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32600007
pii: eaht.e2020009
doi: 10.5620/eaht.e2020009
pmc: PMC7374185
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e2020009

Références

Environ Monit Assess. 2005 Jun;105(1-3):431-47
pubmed: 15952533
Chemosphere. 2017 Jan;166:41-62
pubmed: 27684437
Bioresour Technol. 2006 Mar;97(5):740-7
pubmed: 16324841
Bioresour Technol. 2007 Sep;98(12):2243-57
pubmed: 16427277
Water Sci Technol. 2003;48(5):307-13
pubmed: 14621178
Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2000 Jun;11(3):271-9
pubmed: 10851150
J Hazard Mater. 2005 Jun 30;122(1-2):7-15
pubmed: 15943924
Environ Int. 2004 Apr;30(2):261-78
pubmed: 14749114
Water Res. 2001 Jul;35(10):2371-6
pubmed: 11394770
J Toxicol. 2018 Sep 27;2018:2568038
pubmed: 30363677
Chemosphere. 2017 Mar;170:10-16
pubmed: 27951446

Auteurs

Uloma Linda Nwaehiri (UL)

Department of Environmental Biology, Federal Polytechnic Nekede, Owerri, Nigeria.

Peter Ikechukwu Akwukwaegbu (PI)

Department of Biochemistry, University of Port Harcourt, Choba, Nigeria.

Bertram Ekejiuba Bright Nwoke (BE)

Department of Animal and Environmental Biology, Imo State University, Owerri, Nigeria.

Classifications MeSH