The impact of antimicrobial stewardship program implementation at four tertiary private hospitals: results of a five-years pre-post analysis.
Antimicrobial agents
Broad-spectrum antibiotics
Consumption
Cost
Defined daily dose
Healthcare associated infections
Saudi Arabia
Journal
Antimicrobial resistance and infection control
ISSN: 2047-2994
Titre abrégé: Antimicrob Resist Infect Control
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101585411
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 06 2020
29 06 2020
Historique:
received:
06
02
2020
accepted:
04
06
2020
entrez:
1
7
2020
pubmed:
1
7
2020
medline:
2
4
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs have shown to reduce the emergence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and health-care-associated infections (HAIs), and save health-care costs associated with an inappropriate antimicrobial use. The primary objective of this study was to compare the consumption and cost of antimicrobial agents using defined daily dose (DDD) and direct cost of antibiotics before and after the AMS program implementation. Secondary objective was to determine the rate of HAIs [Clostridium difficile (C. difficile), ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), and central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) before and after the AMS program implementation. This is a pre-post quasi-experimental study. Adult inpatients were enrolled in a prospective fashion under the active AMS arm and compared with historical inpatients who were admitted to the same units before the AMS implementation. Study was conducted at four tertiary private hospitals located in two cities in Saudi Arabia. Adult inpatients were enrolled under the pre- AMS arm and post- AMS arm if they were on any of the ten selected restricted broad-spectrum antibiotics (imipenem/cilastatin, piperacillin/tazobactam, colistin, tigecycline, cefepime, meropenem, ciprofloxacin, moxifloxacin, teicoplanin and linezolid). A total of 409,403 subjects were recruited, 79,369 in the pre- AMS control and 330,034 in the post- AMS arm. Average DDDs consumption of all targeted broad-spectrum antimicrobials from January 2016 to June 2019 post- AMS launch was lower than the DDDs use of these agents pre- AMS (233 vs 320 DDDs per 1000 patient-days, p = 0.689). Antimicrobial expenditures decreased by 28.45% in the first year of the program and remained relatively stable in subsequent years, with overall cumulative cost savings estimated at S.R. 6,286,929 and negligible expenses of S.R. 505,115 (p = 0.648). Rates of healthcare associated infections involving C. difficile, VAP, and CLABSI all decreased significantly after AMS implementation (incidence of HAIs in 2015 compared to 2019: for C. difficile, 94 vs 13, p = 0.024; for VAP, 24 vs 6, p = 0.001; for CLABSI, 17 vs 1, p = 0.000; respectively). Implementation of AMS program at HMG healthcare facilities resulted in reduced antimicrobials use and cost, and lowered incidence of healthcare associated infections.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs have shown to reduce the emergence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and health-care-associated infections (HAIs), and save health-care costs associated with an inappropriate antimicrobial use. The primary objective of this study was to compare the consumption and cost of antimicrobial agents using defined daily dose (DDD) and direct cost of antibiotics before and after the AMS program implementation. Secondary objective was to determine the rate of HAIs [Clostridium difficile (C. difficile), ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), and central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) before and after the AMS program implementation.
METHODS
This is a pre-post quasi-experimental study. Adult inpatients were enrolled in a prospective fashion under the active AMS arm and compared with historical inpatients who were admitted to the same units before the AMS implementation. Study was conducted at four tertiary private hospitals located in two cities in Saudi Arabia. Adult inpatients were enrolled under the pre- AMS arm and post- AMS arm if they were on any of the ten selected restricted broad-spectrum antibiotics (imipenem/cilastatin, piperacillin/tazobactam, colistin, tigecycline, cefepime, meropenem, ciprofloxacin, moxifloxacin, teicoplanin and linezolid).
RESULTS
A total of 409,403 subjects were recruited, 79,369 in the pre- AMS control and 330,034 in the post- AMS arm. Average DDDs consumption of all targeted broad-spectrum antimicrobials from January 2016 to June 2019 post- AMS launch was lower than the DDDs use of these agents pre- AMS (233 vs 320 DDDs per 1000 patient-days, p = 0.689). Antimicrobial expenditures decreased by 28.45% in the first year of the program and remained relatively stable in subsequent years, with overall cumulative cost savings estimated at S.R. 6,286,929 and negligible expenses of S.R. 505,115 (p = 0.648). Rates of healthcare associated infections involving C. difficile, VAP, and CLABSI all decreased significantly after AMS implementation (incidence of HAIs in 2015 compared to 2019: for C. difficile, 94 vs 13, p = 0.024; for VAP, 24 vs 6, p = 0.001; for CLABSI, 17 vs 1, p = 0.000; respectively).
CONCLUSION
Implementation of AMS program at HMG healthcare facilities resulted in reduced antimicrobials use and cost, and lowered incidence of healthcare associated infections.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32600391
doi: 10.1186/s13756-020-00751-4
pii: 10.1186/s13756-020-00751-4
pmc: PMC7322716
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Bacterial Agents
0
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
95Références
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018 Jun 1;73(suppl_6):vi50-vi58
pubmed: 29878222
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 Jan;52(1):112-6
pubmed: 14687324
Chest. 2013 Dec;144(6):1759-1767
pubmed: 23788274
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007 May;59(5):990-5
pubmed: 17387117
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012 Dec;67(12):2988-96
pubmed: 22899806
Arch Dis Child. 2015 May;100(5):454-9
pubmed: 25503715
Infection. 2015 Feb;43(1):45-50
pubmed: 25344419
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2017 Nov;23(11):793-798
pubmed: 28882725
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012 Jul;67(7):1701-5
pubmed: 22461312
Lancet Infect Dis. 2016 Jul;16(7):847-856
pubmed: 26947617
J Infect Public Health. 2018 May - Jun;11(3):310-313
pubmed: 28864362
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2006 Jul;27(7):748-53
pubmed: 16807852
Drugs. 1988 Apr;35(4):373-447
pubmed: 3292209
Ann Saudi Med. 2012 Sep-Oct;32(5):517-20
pubmed: 22871622
Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Sep 1;45 Suppl 2:S112-21
pubmed: 17683015
Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Sep;17(9):990-1001
pubmed: 28629876
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016 Jul 22;60(8):4840-52
pubmed: 27246783
Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Aug;15(4):235-9
pubmed: 16885246
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011 Sep;66(9):2168-74
pubmed: 21676904
Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Jan 15;44(2):159-77
pubmed: 17173212
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Oct 05;(10):CD007577
pubmed: 21975771
J Infect Public Health. 2015 May-Jun;8(3):234-41
pubmed: 25466592
Pharmacotherapy. 2009 May;29(5):593-607
pubmed: 19397466
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2012 Apr;33(4):405-8
pubmed: 22418638
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Apr 30;(4):CD003543
pubmed: 23633313
Ann Saudi Med. 2013 Nov-Dec;33(6):547-54
pubmed: 24413857
Am J Med Qual. 2016 May;31(3):197-202
pubmed: 25609646
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2014 Jun 1;71(11):943-9
pubmed: 24830998
JAMA. 2003 Nov 19;290(19):2588-98
pubmed: 14625336
Bull World Health Organ. 2018 Apr 01;96(4):266-280
pubmed: 29695883
Jpn J Infect Dis. 2007 May;60(2-3):123-5
pubmed: 17515646
Nature. 2017 May 3;545(7652):23-25
pubmed: 28470219
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2015 Mar;45(3):262-7
pubmed: 25554468
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2018 Dec 21;7:156
pubmed: 30598819
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016 Apr 22;60(5):3170-3
pubmed: 26926640
BMC Infect Dis. 2015 Oct 29;15:480
pubmed: 26511839
J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2018 Dec;15:196-209
pubmed: 30071356
J Travel Med. 2017 Apr 1;24(suppl_1):S57-S74
pubmed: 28521004