Prevalence and incidence of visual impairment in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy in India.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 06 2020
29 06 2020
Historique:
received:
04
01
2020
accepted:
05
06
2020
entrez:
1
7
2020
pubmed:
1
7
2020
medline:
15
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To provide the real-world outcomes of people with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) in India and highlight opportunities for improvement of their disease status and to evaluate their visual acuity (VA) status. A multicenter retrospective study in which ten centers in India with established vitreoretinal services for over 10 years were invited to provide long-term data on PDR. This study population were of Indian nationality. Patients with a diagnosis of type 1 or 2 diabetes with a clinical diagnosis of active PDR in any or both eyes, who had long term follow-up for up to 10 years were included. Baseline data collected included age, sex, duration of diabetes, source of referral and best-corrected visual acuity, diabetic retinopathy status in both eyes. Available follow-up data on VA were collected at 6 months post baseline, 5 years and 10 years within a ± 3 months window. Evaluating the presenting VA of people with PDR, short-term outcomes at 6 months and the incidence of visual impairment (VI) at 5 and 10 years are the main outcome of the study. Data was available for 516, 424 and 455 patients at baseline, 5 years and 10 years respectively. Gender and duration of diabetes did not have statistically significant effect on VI outcomes. Eyes receiving treatment early in the disease course (i.e. baseline VA ≥ 6/12) had significantly better VA outcomes at 10 years versus eyes treated at a later stage (i.e. baseline VA < 6/12) (p = <0.0001). On comparing eyes with stable treated PDR and persistent PDR at end of 10 year follow up, a significantly higher percentage of eyes in the stable treated group maintained VA of ≥ 6/12 (55.1% vs. 24.2%) (p = < 0.0001), indicating persistent disease activity due to inadequate treatment results in worse VA outcomes. We found no trend in VI or blindness with increasing levels of age at both 5- and 10-year time points (p > 0.05). The age standardized incidence for VI was 11.10% (95% CI 8.1, 14.2) and for blindness was found to be 7.7% (95% CI 5.2, 10.3). Our results suggest that despite robust recent clinical trial results showing that pan retinal photocoagulation is an excellent treatment for PDR, people with diabetes in India need to be made aware of annual screening and treatment of their eyes to avoid vision impairment and blindness.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32601324
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-67350-6
pii: 10.1038/s41598-020-67350-6
pmc: PMC7324375
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
10513Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/P027881/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
The Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Photocoagulation treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy Clinical application of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (DRS) findings, DRS Report Number 8. Ophthalmology. 88(7), 583–600 (1981).
doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(81)34978-1
Scanlon, P. H. The English National Screening Programme for diabetic retinopathy. Acta Diabetol. 54(6), 515–25 (2017).
doi: 10.1007/s00592-017-0974-1
Thomas, R. L., Halim, S., Gurudas, S., Sivaprasad, S. & Owens, D. R. IDF Diabetes Atlas: a review of studies utilising retinal photography on the global prevalence of diabetes related retinopathy between 2015 and 2018. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 157, 107840 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.107840
Obeid, A. et al. Loss to follow-up in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy after panretinal photocoagulation or intravitreal anti-VEGF injections. Ophthalmology 125(9), 1386–1392 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.02.034
Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Effects of aspirin treatment on diabetic retinopathy. ETDRS report number 8. Ophthalmology 98(5 Suppl), 757–65 (1991).
Gross, J. G. et al. Panretinal photocoagulation vs intravitreous ranibizumab for proliferative diabetic retinopathy: a randomized clinical trial. Jama 314(20), 2137–46 (2015).
doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.15217
Sivaprasad, S. et al. Clinical efficacy of intravitreal aflibercept versus panretinal photocoagulation for best corrected visual acuity in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy at 52 weeks (CLARITY): a multicentre, single-blinded, randomised, controlled, phase 2b, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 389(10085), 2193–2203 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31193-5
Gross, J. G. et al. Five-year outcomes of panretinal photocoagulation vs intravitreous ranibizumab for proliferative diabetic retinopathy: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 136(10), 1138–48 (2018).
doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.3255
Diabetic retinopathy study. Report Number 6. Design, methods, and baseline results. Report Number 7. A modification of the Airlie House classification of diabetic retinopathy. Prepared by the Diabetic Retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 21(1 Pt 2), 1–226 (1981).
The Diabetic Retinopathy Vitrectomy Study Research Group. Early vitrectomy for severe vitreous hemorrhage in diabetic retinopathy. Two-year results of a randomized trial. Diabetic Retinopathy Vitrectomy Study report 2. Arch Ophthalmol. 103(11), 1644–52 (1985).
doi: 10.1001/archopht.1985.01050110038020
Varma, R. et al. Four-year incidence and progression of visual impairment in Latinos: the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study. Am J Ophthalmol. 149(5), 713–727 (2010).
doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.12.011
Scanlon, P. H., Aldington, S. J. & Stratton, I. M. Delay in diabetic retinopathy screening increases the rate of detection of referable diabetic retinopathy. Diabet Med. 31(4), 439–442 (2014).
doi: 10.1111/dme.12313
Bressler, S. B. et al. Panretinal photocoagulation versus ranibizumab for proliferative diabetic retinopathy: factors associated with vision and edema outcomes. Ophthalmology. 125(11), 1776–83 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.04.039
Flaxman, S. R. et al. Global causes of blindness and distance vision impairment 1990–2020: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health 5(12), e1221–e34 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30393-5
Gonzalez, V. H., Wang, P. W. & Ruiz, C. Q. Panretinal photocoagulation for diabetic retinopathy in the RIDE and RISE trials: not “1 and done”. Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.08.010 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.08.010
pubmed: 31810575
Lopez-Ramos, A. et al. Rapid assessment of avoidable blindness: Prevalence of blindness, visual impairment and diabetes in nuevo leon, Mexico 2014. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 25(5–6), 412–418 (2018).
doi: 10.1080/09286586.2018.1501498
Rema, M., Sujatha, P. & Pradeepa, R. Visual outcomes of pan-retinal photocoagulation in diabetic retinopathy at one-year follow-up and associated risk factors. Indian J Ophthalmol. 53(2), 93–99 (2005).
doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.16171
Lartey, S. Y. & Aikins, A. K. Visual impairment amongst adult diabetics attending a tertiary outpatient clinic. Ghana Med J. 52(2), 84–87 (2018).
doi: 10.4314/gmj.v52i2.4
Choovuthayakorn, J. et al. Characteristics and outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy for proliferative diabetic retinopathy patients in a Limited Resource Tertiary Center over an eight-year period. J Ophthalmol. 2019, 9481902 (2019).
doi: 10.1155/2019/9481902