"Your Finger or Mine?"-Patient Preferences in the Collection of Fecal Occult Blood Testing in the Emergency Department.


Journal

Military medicine
ISSN: 1930-613X
Titre abrégé: Mil Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 2984771R

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
18 09 2020
Historique:
received: 10 07 2019
revised: 23 09 2019
accepted: 01 11 2019
pubmed: 1 7 2020
medline: 30 3 2021
entrez: 1 7 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

There are a number of presenting Emergency Department complaints that may necessitate the testing of stool for the presence of blood. A provider-performed digital rectal examination is frequently performed solely for the collection of stool for a fecal occult blood testing (FOBT). With increased emphasis on patient autonomy and shared decision-making, it is appropriate to consider patient preferences with regard to who performs the invasive collection of stool. Our objective was to determine patient preference in regard to provider versus self-collection of stool sample for use in FOBT and identify patient demographics associated with those more likely to self-collect. Finally, we examined specimen adequacy and patient satisfaction by open-ended comment. We conducted a 1-year, prospective, non-randomized, observational trial with a convenience sample of 100 patients. After enrollment, study participants were offered the choice of self-collection versus provider collection. Stool collection proceeded according to participant preference. Simple descriptive statistics were used to analyze the primary outcome. The secondary proportional univariate outcomes were evaluated with chi-square testing (alpha level-0.05). We used a multivariable logistic regression model to evaluate the association of independent variables with the likelihood to perform self-collection. A total of 100 patients were enrolled over 1 year, with 51% choosing to collect their own sample. Younger age was the only statistically significant predictor for self-collection (p < 0.001); furthermore, for every year of increasing age, patients were 3% less likely to choose self-collection. All self-collected samples were adequate for testing. In univariate analyses, patients younger than 35 were more likely to perform self-collection (66%) compared with those over 35 (36%). Those over 64 self-collected only 24% of the time. Neither sex nor race were associated with collection method preference. When offered the choice between self-directed or provider-performed stool sample collection, more than half of participants chose to obtain their own sample; furthermore, age was the only statistically significant predictor of preference for collection method. All patients who self-collected were able to provide an adequate sample. Our evidence suggests the offer of FOBT self-collection is a feasible method to enhance patient autonomy and improve therapeutic alliances.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32601685
pii: 5864881
doi: 10.1093/milmed/usz429
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e1393-e1396

Informations de copyright

© Association of Military Surgeons of the United States 2020. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Auteurs

Paul Freeman (P)

Department of Emergency Medicine, Landstuhl Regional Medical Center, Geb 3377, Landstuhl 66849, Germany.

Kyle Couperus (K)

Department of Emergency Medicine, 9040A Jackson Ave, Madigan Army Medical Center, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, WA 98431.

Ryan Walsh (R)

Department of Emergency Medicine, 1211 Medical Center Dr, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37204.

Michael J Ward (MJ)

Department of Emergency Medicine, 1211 Medical Center Dr, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37204.

Candace D McNaughton (CD)

Department of Emergency Medicine, 1211 Medical Center Dr, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37204.

Jason Bothwell (J)

Department of Emergency Medicine, 9040A Jackson Ave, Madigan Army Medical Center, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, WA 98431.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH