Posterior reconstruction during robotic-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal orthotopic ileal neobladder: description and outcomes of a simple step.
Aged
Anastomosis, Surgical
/ methods
Cystectomy
/ methods
Feasibility Studies
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Plastic Surgery Procedures
/ methods
Robotic Surgical Procedures
/ methods
Surgically-Created Structures
Treatment Outcome
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
/ pathology
Urinary Diversion
/ methods
Urinary Reservoirs, Continent
Bladder cancer
Neobladder
Posterior reconstruction
Radical cystectomy
Robotic surgery
Urinary incontinence
Journal
Journal of robotic surgery
ISSN: 1863-2491
Titre abrégé: J Robot Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101300401
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2021
Jun 2021
Historique:
received:
03
06
2020
accepted:
22
06
2020
pubmed:
1
7
2020
medline:
12
10
2021
entrez:
1
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A posterior reconstruction (PR) might improve the fluidity and delicacy of the maneuvers related to the neovesico-urethral anastomosis during robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC). Our objective is to describe in detail the surgical steps of PR and to assess its feasibility and functional outcomes. The data regarding patients undergoing a totally intracorporeal RARC with neobladder and PR for high-grade and/or muscle-invasive urothelial cancer of the bladder at Karolinska University Hospital between October 2015 and November 2016 by a single surgeon (PW) were reviewed. Prior to the anastomosis, a modified posterior Rocco's repair involving the Denonvillier's fascia, the rhabdosphincter, and the posterior side of the ileal neobladder neck was performed. The steps are shown in a video at https://doi.org/10.1089/vid.2019.0029 . The primary outcome was urinary continence; the secondary outcomes were urinary leakage, intermittent catheterization, and complications related to the reconstructive steps. Eleven male patients with a median age and BMI of 67 years and 24, respectively, underwent RARC with PR associated to the neovesico-urethral anastomosis. Overall and posterior reconstruction time were 300' (195-320) and 6' (4-7), respectively. The daytime and nighttime continence rates were 100% and 44% at 12 months, respectively; the median pad weight was 3.5 g and 108 g at daytime and nighttime, respectively. One urinary leakage from the urethrovesical anastomosis was treated conservatively. Two patients perform intermittent catheterization. The posterior reconstruction during RARC is safe and feasible, providing good continence rates. It supported a careful suturing of the anastomosis as well as an uncomplicated catheter placement.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32602023
doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01108-0
pii: 10.1007/s11701-020-01108-0
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
355-361Références
Novara G, Catto WF, Wilson T et al (2015) Systematic review and cumulative analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical cystectomy. Eur Urol 67:476–501
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.007
Rocco F, Gadda F, Acquati P et al (2001) Personal research: reconstruction of the urethral striated sphincter. Arch Ital Urol Androl 73:127–137
pubmed: 11822054
Ghani KR, Menon M (2012) Posterior reconstruction: weighing the evidence. Eur Urol 62:791–793
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.06.006
Hautmann RE, De Petriconi R, Gottfried HW, Kleinschmidt K, Mattes R, Paiss T (1999) The ileal neobladder: complications and functional results in 363 patients. J Urol 161:422–428
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)61909-8
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 and result of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213
doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae
Wiklund PN, Poulakis V (2011) Surgery illustrated-surgical atlas: robotic neobladder. BJU Int 107:1514–1537
doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10307.x
Collins JW, Tyritzis S, Nyberg T et al (2013) Robot-assisted radical cystectomy: description of an evolved approach to radical cystectomy. Eur Urol 64:654–663
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.020
Van Velthoven RF, Ahkering TE, Peltier A, Skarecky DW, Clayman RV (2003) Technique for laparoscopic running urethrovesical anastomosis: the single knot method. Urology 61:699–702
doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(02)02543-8
Rocco B, Luciani LG, Collins J, Sanchez-Salas R, Adding C, Mattevi D, Hosseini A, Wiklund P (2019) Posterior reconstruction during robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal orthotopic ileal neobladder. Videourology. https://doi.org/10.1089/vid.2019.0029
doi: 10.1089/vid.2019.0029
Clifford TG, Shah SH, Bazargani ST et al (2016) Prospective evaluation of continence following radical cystectomy and orthotopic urinary diversion using a validated questionnaire. J Urol 196:1685–1691
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.093
Zellner M (2011) Incontinence after radical prostatectomy and cystectomy: are combined training with mechanical devices and whole body vibration effective? Urologe A 50:433–444
doi: 10.1007/s00120-010-2478-2
Schlenker B, Gratzke C, Reich O et al (2006) Preliminary results on the off-label use of duloxetine for the treatment of stress incontinence after radical prostatectomy or cystectomy. Eur Urol 49:1075–1078
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.01.038
Mayer M, Bauer RM, Walther S et al (2009) Stress urinary incontinence after radical cystectomy: neobladder reconstruction and placamento of retrourethral sling. Urologe A 48:645–648
doi: 10.1007/s00120-009-1971-y
Simma-Chiang V, Ginsberg DA, Teruya KK, Boyd SD (2012) Outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter placement in men after radical cystectomy and orthotopic urinary diversions for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: the University of Southern California experience. Urology 79:1397–1401
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.02.006
Rocco B, Cozzi G, Spinelli MG et al (2012) Posterior muscolofascial reconstruction after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol 62:779–790
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.041
Burnett AL, Mostwin JL (1998) In situ anatomical study of the male urethral sphincteric complex: relevance to continence preservation during major pelvic surgery. J Urol 160:179–192
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)62521-7
Walz J, Burnett AL, Costello AJ et al (2010) A critical analysis of the current knowledge of surgical anatomy related to the optimization of cancer control and preservation of continence and erection in candidates for radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 57:179–192
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.11.009
Tyritzis SI, Hosseini A, Collins J et al (2013) Oncologic, functional, and complications outcomes of robot-assisted radical cystectomy with totally intracorporeal neobladder diversion. Eur Urol 64:734–741
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.050
Yuh B, Wilson T, Bochner B et al (2015) Systematic review and cumulative analysis of oncologic and functional outcomes after robot-assisted radical cystectomy. Eur Urol 67:402–422
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.008
Goh AC, Gill IS, Lee DJ et al (2012) Robotic intracorporeal orthotopic ileal neobladder: replicating open surgical principles. Eur Urol 62:891–901
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.07.052
Satkunasivam R, Santomauro M, Chopra S et al (2016) Robotic intracorporeal orthotopic neopladder: urodynamic outcomes, urinary function, and healthe-related quality of life. Eur Urol 69:247–253
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.041