Susceptibility-Based Characterization of Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations.
Journal
Investigative radiology
ISSN: 1536-0210
Titre abrégé: Invest Radiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0045377
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2020
11 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
1
7
2020
medline:
7
5
2021
entrez:
1
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to explore blood deoxygenation across cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) for functional characterization of AVM vasculature. Fifteen patients with cerebral arteriovenous vascular malformation were prospectively studied by digital subtraction angiography and using a 3 T magnetic resonance imaging system, with which three-dimensional (3D) gradient echo data for the calculation of quantitative susceptibility maps, velocity-encoded 3D gradient echo data for 3D flow assessment, and contrast-enhanced 3D time-of-flight data were acquired.The nidus, major supplying artery, and major draining veins were identified on digital subtraction angiography, and volumes of interest of the AVM nidus, AVM-related inflow and outflow vessels, and non-AVM-related normal veins were drawn on coregistered contrast-enhanced 3D time-of-flight data. The resulting volumes of interest were applied to quantitative susceptibility mapping and flow data. All patients showed a significant stepwise increase in susceptibility between feeding artery and nidus as well as between nidus and draining vein (Padjusted = 0.035, Padjusted= 0.007, respectively). Results revealed between 9.3% and 50.9% of the normal transcapillary blood deoxygenation-related susceptibility change between the feeding artery and the draining vein of the AVMs. When normalized by nidal blood flow velocity, this change was correlated with the presence of perinidal blood products. The mean susceptibility change across cerebral AVMs normalized with nidal volume inversely correlated with mean nidal flow velocity. Susceptibility changes indicating blood deoxygenation across cerebral AVMs were shown for the first time in this study and were associated with the presence of perinidal blood products. Deoxygenation measures may serve as functional characterization of AVM vasculature and may offer the potential for individual treatment assessment and possible risk stratification.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32604388
doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000695
pii: 00004424-202011000-00002
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
702-710Références
Kaplan HA, Aronson SM, Browder EJ. Vascular malformations of brain. Anatomical study. J Neurosurg. 1961;18:630–635.
Tasiou A, Tzerefos C, Alleyne CH Jr., et al. Arteriovenous malformations: congenital or acquired lesions?World Neurosurg. 2020;134:e799–e807.
Braverman IM, Keh A, Jacobson BS. Ultrastructure and three-dimensional organization of the telangiectases of hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia. J Invest Dermatol. 1990;95:422–427.
Rigamonti D, Johnson PC, Spetzler RF, et al. Cavernous malformations and capillary telangiectasia: a spectrum within a single pathological entity. Neurosurgery. 1991;28:60–64.
Su H, Kim H, Pawlikowska L, et al. Reduced expression of integrin alphavbeta8 is associated with brain arteriovenous malformation pathogenesis. Am J Pathol. 2010;176:1018–1027.
Hashimoto T, Emala CW, Joshi S, et al. Abnormal pattern of Tie-2 and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor expression in human cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Neurosurgery. 2000;47:910–918; discussion 918–919.
Padget DH. The cranial venous system in man in reference to development, adult configuration, and relation to the arteries. Am J Anat. 1956;98:307–355.
Stapf C, Mast H, Sciacca RR, et al. Predictors of hemorrhage in patients with untreated brain arteriovenous malformation. Neurology. 2006;66:1350–1355.
da Costa L, Wallace MC, Ter Brugge KG, et al. The natural history and predictive features of hemorrhage from brain arteriovenous malformations. Stroke. 2009;40:100–105.
Kim H, Al-Shahi Salman R, McCulloch CE, et al. Untreated brain arteriovenous malformation: patient-level meta-analysis of hemorrhage predictors. Neurology. 2014;83:590–597.
Kader A, Young WL, Pile-Spellman J, et al. The influence of hemodynamic and anatomic factors on hemorrhage from cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Neurosurgery. 1994;34:801–807; discussion 807–808.
Pollock BE, Flickinger JC, Lunsford LD, et al. Factors that predict the bleeding risk of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Stroke. 1996;27:1–6.
Spetzler RF, Martin NA. A proposed grading system for arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg. 1986;65:476–483.
Morgenstern PF, Hoffman CE, Kocharian G, et al. Postoperative imaging for detection of recurrent arteriovenous malformations in children. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2016;17:134–140.
Chang W, Wu Y, Johnson K, et al. Fast contrast-enhanced 4D MRA and 4D flow MRI using constrained reconstruction (HYPRFlow): potential applications for brain arteriovenous malformations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36:1049–1055.
Pant B, Sumida M, Arita K, et al. Usefulness of three-dimensional phase contrast MR angiography on arteriovenous malformations. Neurosurg Rev. 1997;20:171–176.
Aristova M, Vali A, Ansari SA, et al. Standardized evaluation of cerebral arteriovenous malformations using flow distribution network graphs and dual-venc 4D flow MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019;50:1718–1730.
Stankovic Z, Blanke P, Markl M. Usefulness of 4D MRI flow imaging to control TIPS function. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:327–328.
Dumoulin CL, Souza SP, Walker MF, et al. Three-dimensional phase contrast angiography. Magn Reson Med. 1989;9:139–149.
Szajer J, Ho-Shon K. A comparison of 4D flow MRI-derived wall shear stress with computational fluid dynamics methods for intracranial aneurysms and carotid bifurcations - a review. Magn Reson Imaging. 2018;48:62–69.
Alaraj A, Shakur SF, Amin-Hanjani S, et al. Changes in wall shear stress of cerebral arteriovenous malformation feeder arteries after embolization and surgery. Stroke. 2015;46:1216–1220.
Nornes H, Grip A. Hemodynamic aspects of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg. 1980;53:456–464.
Young WL, Kader A, Pile-Spellman J, et al. Arteriovenous malformation draining vein physiology and determinants of transnidal pressure gradients. The Columbia University AVM study project. Neurosurgery. 1994;35:389–395; discussion 395–396.
Haacke EM, Liu SF, Buch S, et al. Quantitative susceptibility mapping: current status and future directions. Magn Reson Imaging. 2015;33:1–25.
Wang Y, Liu T. Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM): decoding MRI data for a tissue magnetic biomarker. Magn Reson Med. 2015;73:82–101.
Gomori JM, Grossman RI. Mechanisms responsible for the MR appearance and evolution of intracranial hemorrhage. Radiographics. 1988;8:427–440.
Chen W, Zhu W, Kovanlikaya I, et al. Intracranial calcifications and hemorrhages: characterization with quantitative susceptibility mapping. Radiology. 2014;270:496–505.
Schweser F, Deistung A, Lehr BW, et al. Differentiation between diamagnetic and paramagnetic cerebral lesions based on magnetic susceptibility mapping. Med Phys. 2010;37:5165–5178.
Haacke EM, Lai S, Reichenbach JR, et al. In vivo measurement of blood oxygen saturation using magnetic resonance imaging: a direct validation of the blood oxygen level-dependent concept in functional brain imaging. Hum Brain Mapp. 1997;5:341–346.
Fan AP, Bilgic B, Gagnon L, et al. Quantitative oxygenation venography from MRI phase. Magn Reson Med. 2014;72:149–159.
Biondetti E, Rojas-Villabona A, Sokolska M, et al. Investigating the oxygenation of brain arteriovenous malformations using quantitative susceptibility mapping. Neuroimage. 2019;199:440–453.
Niu HC, Cao Y, Wang XJ, et al. Relationships between hemorrhage, angioarchitectural factors and collagen of arteriovenous malformations. Neurosci Bull. 2012;28:595–605.
Mandybur TI, Nazek M. Cerebral arteriovenous-malformations - a detailed morphological and immunohistochemical study using actin. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1990;114:970–973.
Vazquez AL, Fukuda M, Tasker ML, et al. Changes in cerebral arterial, tissue and venous oxygenation with evoked neural stimulation: implications for hemoglobin-based functional neuroimaging. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2010;30:428–439.
Duling BR, Kuschinsky W, Wahl M. Measurements of the perivascular Po2 in the vicinity of the pial vessels of the cat. Pflugers Arch. 1979;383:29–34.
Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Heidemann RM, et al. Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn Reson Med. 2002;47:1202–1210.
Prock T, Collins DJ, Dzik-Jurasz AS, et al. An algorithm for the optimum combination of data from arbitrary magnetic resonance phased array probes. Phys Med Biol. 2002;47:N39–N46.
Li W, Wu B, Liu CL. Quantitative susceptibility mapping of human brain reflects spatial variation in tissue composition. Neuroimage. 2011;55:1645–1656.
Li W, Avram AV, Wu B, et al. Integrated Laplacian-based phase unwrapping and background phase removal for quantitative susceptibility mapping. NMR Biomed. 2014;27:219–227.
Wu B, Li W, Guidon A, et al. Whole brain susceptibility mapping using compressed sensing. Magn Reson Med. 2012;67:137–147.
Wei HJ, Dibb R, Zhou Y, et al. Streaking artifact reduction for quantitative susceptibility mapping of sources with large dynamic range. NMR Biomed. 2015;28:1294–1303.
Smith SM. Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum Brain Mapp. 2002;17:143–155.
Maleike D, Nolden M, Meinzer HP, et al. Interactive segmentation framework of the medical imaging interaction toolkit. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2009;96:72–83.
Nolden M, Zelzer S, Seitel A, et al. The medical imaging interaction toolkit: challenges and advances. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2013;8:607–620.
Straub S, Schneider TM, Emmerich J, et al. Suitable reference tissues for quantitative susceptibility mapping of the brain. Magn Reson Med. 2017;78:204–214.
Abdul-Rahman HS, Gdeisat MA, Burton DR, et al. Fast and robust three-dimensional best path phase unwrapping algorithm. Appl Optics. 2007;46:6623–6635.
Stein D, Fritzsche KH, Nolden M, et al. The extensible open-source rigid and affine image registration module of the medical imaging interaction toolkit (MITK). Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2010;100:79–86.
Mohr JP, Parides MK, Stapf C, et al. Medical management with or without interventional therapy for unruptured brain arteriovenous malformations (ARUBA): a multicentre, non-blinded, randomised trial. Lancet. 2014;383:614–621.
Kennan RP, Zhong J, Gore JC. Intravascular susceptibility contrast mechanisms in tissues. Magn Reson Med. 1994;31:9–21.
Isoda K, Fukuda H, Takamura N, et al. Arteriovenous malformation of the brain – histological study and micrometric measurement of abnormal vessels. Acta Pathol Jpn. 1981;31:883–893.
Haacke EM, Tang J, Neelavalli J, et al. Susceptibility mapping as a means to visualize veins and quantify oxygen saturation. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010;32:663–676.
Hsieh CY, Cheng YC, Xie H, et al. Susceptibility and size quantification of small human veins from an MRI method. Magn Reson Imaging. 2015;33:1191–1204.
Kwon Y, Jeon SR, Kim JH, et al. Analysis of the causes of treatment failure in gamma knife radiosurgery for intracranial arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg. 2000;93(suppl 3):104–106.
Schneider BF, Eberhard DA, Steiner LE. Histopathology of arteriovenous malformations after gamma knife radiosurgery. J Neurosurg. 1997;87:352–357.
Wu C, Schnell S, Markl M, et al. Combined DSA and 4D flow demonstrate overt alterations of vascular geometry and hemodynamics in an unusually complex cerebral AVM. Clin Neuroradiol. 2016;26:471–475.
Schnell S, Wu C, Ansari SA. Four-dimensional MRI flow examinations in cerebral and extracerebral vessels - ready for clinical routine?Curr Opin Neurol. 2016;29:419–428.
Chang W, Loecher MW, Wu Y, et al. Hemodynamic changes in patients with arteriovenous malformations assessed using high-resolution 3D radial phase-contrast MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012;33:1565–1572.
Padilla-Vazquez F, Zenteno MA, Balderrama J, et al. A proposed classification for assessing rupture risk in patients with intracranial arteriovenous malformations. Surg Neurol Int. 2017;8:303.
Ansari SA, Schnell S, Carroll T, et al. Intracranial 4D flow MRI: toward individualized assessment of arteriovenous malformation hemodynamics and treatment-induced changes. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013;34:1922–1928.
Wu C, Ansari SA, Honarmand AR, et al. Evaluation of 4D vascular flow and tissue perfusion in cerebral arteriovenous malformations: influence of Spetzler-Martin grade, clinical presentation, and AVM risk factors. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36:1142–1149.
Yamada S, Brauer FS, Colohan AR, et al. Concept of arteriovenous malformation compartments and surgical management. Neurol Res. 2004;26:288–300.
Ito H, Takahashi K, Hatazawa J, et al. Changes in human regional cerebral blood flow and cerebral blood volume during visual stimulation measured by positron emission tomography. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2001;21:608–612.
Litao ML, Pilar-Arceo CP, Legaspi GD. AVM compartments: do they modulate trasnidal pressures? An electrical network analysis. Asian J Neurosurg. 2012;7:174–180.
Tateishi N, Maeda N, Shiga T. A method for measuring the rate of oxygen release from single microvessels. Circ Res. 1992;70:812–819.
Ivanov KP, Kalinina MK, Levkovich YuI. Blood flow velocity in capillaries of brain and muscles and its physiological significance. Microvasc Res. 1981;22:143–155.
Akons K, Dann EJ, Yelin D. Measuring blood oxygen saturation along a capillary vessel in human. Biomed Opt Express. 2017;8:5342–5348.
Zaitsu Y, Kudo K, Terae S, et al. Mapping of cerebral oxygen extraction fraction changes with susceptibility-weighted phase imaging. Radiology. 2011;261:930–936.
Vovenko E. Distribution of oxygen tension on the surface of arterioles, capillaries and venules of brain cortex and in tissue in normoxia: an experimental study on rats. Pflugers Arch. 1999;437:617–623.
Alexander MD, Cooke DL, Nelson J, et al. Association between venous angioarchitectural features of sporadic brain arteriovenous malformations and intracranial hemorrhage. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36:949–952.
Duong DH, Young WL, Vang MC, et al. Feeding artery pressure and venous drainage pattern are primary determinants of hemorrhage from cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Stroke. 1998;29:1167–1176.
Illies T, Forkert ND, Saering D, et al. Persistent hemodynamic changes in ruptured brain arteriovenous malformations. Stroke. 2012;43:2910–2915.
Sun HF, Kate M, Gioia LC, et al. Quantitative susceptibility mapping using a superposed dipole inversion method: application to intracranial hemorrhage. Magn Reson Med. 2016;76:781–791.
Schweser F, Deistung A, Sommer K, et al. Toward online reconstruction of quantitative susceptibility maps: superfast dipole inversion. Magn Reson Med. 2013;69:1581–1593.