A Precise Prediction Method for the Properties of API-Containing Tablets Based on Data from Placebo Tablets.
database
disintegration time
quality by design
response surface method
tablet
tensile strength
Journal
Pharmaceutics
ISSN: 1999-4923
Titre abrégé: Pharmaceutics
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101534003
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Jun 2020
28 Jun 2020
Historique:
received:
02
05
2020
revised:
05
06
2020
accepted:
27
06
2020
entrez:
2
7
2020
pubmed:
2
7
2020
medline:
2
7
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
We previously reported a novel method for the precise prediction of tablet properties (e.g., tensile strength (TS)) using a small number of experimental data. The key technique of this method is to compensate for the lack of experimental data by using data of placebo tablets collected in a database. This study provides further technical knowledge to discuss the usefulness of this prediction method. Placebo tablets consisting of microcrystalline cellulose, lactose, and cornstarch were prepared using the design of an experimental method, and their TS and disintegration time (DT) were measured. The response surfaces representing the relationship between the formulation and the tablet properties were then created. This study investigated tablets containing four different active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) with a drug load ranging from 20-60%. Overall, the TS of API-containing tablets could be precisely predicted by this method, while the prediction accuracy of the DT was much lower than that of the TS. These results suggested that the mode of action of APIs on the DT was more complicated than that on the TS. Our prediction method could be valuable for the development of tablet formulations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32605318
pii: pharmaceutics12070601
doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12070601
pmc: PMC7408303
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : JSPS KAKENHI
ID : 20K06986
Références
Pharm Res. 2008 Apr;25(4):781-91
pubmed: 18185986
J Pharm Sci. 2013 Jun;102(6):1869-1882
pubmed: 23568772
Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2016 Sep;106:79-87
pubmed: 27185378
AAPS PharmSciTech. 2003 Dec 15;4(4):E62
pubmed: 15198557
Int J Pharm. 2014 Oct 1;473(1-2):617-26
pubmed: 25087508
Int J Pharm. 2015;486(1-2):112-20
pubmed: 25797055
Acta Pharm Sin B. 2019 Jan;9(1):177-185
pubmed: 30766789
Int J Pharm. 2001 Jun 4;220(1-2):149-60
pubmed: 11376977
Int J Pharm. 2015 Jul 25;490(1-2):47-54
pubmed: 25981619
Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo). 2012;60(11):1419-25
pubmed: 22878814
J Pharm Sci. 2005 Mar;94(3):465-72
pubmed: 15696587
Int J Pharm. 2017 Jul 15;527(1-2):151-160
pubmed: 28549972
J Pharm Sci. 2016 Sep;105(9):2545-2555
pubmed: 27506604
Int J Pharm. 2012 May 30;428(1-2):57-67
pubmed: 22402474
AAPS PharmSciTech. 2012 Dec;13(4):1243-54
pubmed: 22993122
Pharmaceutics. 2020 Mar 31;12(4):
pubmed: 32244401
J Pharm Sci. 1972 Jun;61(6):939-44
pubmed: 5046116
Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2003 Sep 12;55(9):1217-31
pubmed: 12954200
AAPS J. 2014 Jul;16(4):771-83
pubmed: 24854893
Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo). 2013;61(1):39-49
pubmed: 23302585
Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2018 Jul;44(7):1090-1098
pubmed: 29376430
Pharm Res. 2017 May;34(5):890-917
pubmed: 28251425
Int J Pharm. 2010 Feb 15;386(1-2):149-55
pubmed: 19922778
Int J Pharm. 2018 Sep 5;548(1):672-681
pubmed: 30033397
Int J Pharm. 2017 Jun 15;525(1):249-263
pubmed: 28450171
Int J Pharm. 2017 Oct 30;532(1):82-89
pubmed: 28859939
AAPS PharmSciTech. 2013 Sep;14(3):1169-77
pubmed: 23897036
Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo). 2007 Apr;55(4):586-93
pubmed: 17409553
Int J Pharm. 2019 Jun 30;565:209-218
pubmed: 31075438
J Pharm Sci. 2012 Jan;101(1):333-41
pubmed: 21858824
Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2014 Jul;87(2):252-63
pubmed: 24589422